Friday, July 22, 2016

A new Oxymoron: Regimented Democracy

From extreme regimentation on one side of the spectrum to extreme chaos on the other side of it, there exists a mid-point we may call human free will.

The closest analogy to regimentation in the natural phenomena would be Newtonian Mechanics. In fact, you can launch a probe into space and pinpoint where it will be a thousand years from now. As to the closest analogy to chaos, it must be the string of unpredictable digits that give pi its value. And it is between those two extremes that lays human behavior. It is rational enough to be predictable, yet capricious enough to confound.

We call freedom the ability of an individual to choose to behave one way or the other. When in a given set of circumstances a group is allowed to choose between possibilities, it becomes difficult to predict how the group will respond because each individual will make an independent decision. This situation is called democracy; a way to organize society … but also a way that renders it unpredictable.

It happens that the brain, which allows us to make free choices, has determined that more good can be had when individuals give up some of their freedoms and accept being regimented to act collectively like a group. It must be said in this regard that as a species, we have accomplished more than any other because organization has allowed us to exceed the sum of our individual efforts.

And then a complication began to manifest itself. It turned out that unlike the other species who know where to stop when they have enough of something, many of us humans do not know where to stop when the going is good, and there is nothing to prevent us from grabbing more of what's there. This is called greed, a human trait that has caused the demise of great achievers.

Wisdom has been defined in many ways; one being that you do not let greed take control of you. Some of the cultures that accomplished a great deal have learned that lesson early enough and heeded it, which is why they persisted. Others did not learn it till it was too late, and so they perished. And then, there is one culture that never learned the lesson despite the fact that it perished many times throughout the centuries, and was resurrected in a different form each and every time, but always retaining greed as its main characteristic.

That culture calls itself Judaism, a constantly shifting concoction whose many demises came about as a result of its inability to stop exploiting the host cultures that allow it to live off them as a parasite. Its current host being America – a country that prides itself on being democratic – Judaism has exploited this democracy to the point that America is about to buckle under the weight of a burden it cannot begin to fathom. The thing is painted the colors of democracy but is in reality a monstrous toxic load that is Jewish through and through.

You can see how that combination works when you look at the editorial which came under the title: “The Iranian side deal” and the subtitle: “Obama's hocus will come back to poke us,” published on July 19, 2016 in the Pittsburgh Tribune. Nothing in this piece is different from what came in the editorial that was published under the title “Aiding and abetting Iran in getting nukes even faster,” on July 20, 2016 in the New York Daily News. That editorial was discussed yesterday by yours truly on this website in an article that came under the title: “Ignorance is not Bliss but a Curse”.

The significance of these two editorials coming at about the same time is that they are but two echoes from among the dozens of others that were repeated over and over again. What is deceptive in all of this is that democracy, which relies on the will of the majority, has been distorted by the Jews who organize artificial events to give the impression that a majority of the people wants what a minority of Jews wants for itself. This trick renders the outcome of such events predictable, and that's a characteristic that runs contrary to what democracy is all about.

Having taken the American system close to the brink of collapse, the editors of the Tribune had the gall to comment on the explanation that was given by the administration, like this: “Consider it cold comfort from an administration that couldn't tell the truth.” Well, someone should tell these editors that no one in the administration risks being gassed or incinerated. The same cannot be said about those who come up with editorials as asinine as theirs.