One senseless death is painful not only for the loved ones
by for all of humanity. It is even more painful when committed by terror. But
that's not the worst that can happen. When someone tells a lie that can result
in multiple deaths, the pain is compounded proportionately. When the lie is
committed by someone in a fiduciary position, it is compounded exponentially.
Unfortunately and painfully so, this is the kind of lie that
Bridget Johnson has committed. As a contributor to the publicly funded National
Public Radio (NPR,) she has fiduciary obligations that go beyond those of
commercial broadcasters. As a fellow with the Hayman
Salomon Center
and PJ Media, her obsession is Israel ,
always Israel and no one but
Israel .
This means she will tell any lie, cost America
any price and cause any number of deaths if that will serve the interests of Israel . Is this
a conflict of interest? You judge and let NPR know.
All of that comes out clearly from reading the article she
wrote under the title: “Is ISIS 'on the run'?
If so, it's no comfort,” published on July 23, 2016 in the New York Daily News.
Her point – which is that of the Jewish establishment – is that the Obama
administration is saying the wrong things. And this, my friend, is reminiscent
of the Jewish expression: You are antisemitic for saying 'Jewish lobby' instead
of 'Israeli lobby,' and you are antisemitic for saying 'Israeli lobby' instead
of 'Jewish lobby.' How can that be, you ask?
To see how it happens, we need to recall what the Jewish
establishment has been saying all along. It’s been saying that if you mobilize
enough American troops and send them to destroy the bases of operation used by
the terrorists; you destroy the core of those operations and diminish the
appeal of the terror groups. Consequently, they will not be able to recruit new
members, and this will bring an end to them. Well, that's what the Obama
administration has done, though it did not mobilize as many troops as the Jews
would have liked to see.
So now that this mission is nearing completion with apparent
success, guess what Bridget Johnson is saying. She is saying she is not
comforted because what counts, she argues, is not that ISIS
is on the run from something, but that it is running toward something. And
that, she says, is the result of a miscalculation committed by the Obama
administration.
But did she offer an alternative? Not on your life. Jews do
not counsel anything that would end or win wars, they only counsel how to start
them … and they leave it at that. On second thought, amend that to say, she
could not help but take a mocking shot at the administration on her way out.
Here it is: “But does the threat really get more diffuse the further away it is
from some imagined core”? As you may have observed, whereas the core was the
be-all and end-all, it is now only an imagined core. But she is not saying who
was imagining things.
And here is how she ends her article: “Rather than hyping
where terrorists are running from, America 's greater focus should be
on where they are running to.” What she says here is this: Stop making
empirical observations with regard to what happens on the ground, and start
speculating as to what the terrorists may be thinking, and where that will lead
them.
She says this much because in Jewish philosophy, it is a sin
to tell the truth based on what you observe. Also, it is a virtue to wish
something, to speculate that it will happen, and then convince those who will
listen to you that your speculation will come true. If you do that, you elevate
yourself to the level of a rabbi. In fact, this is how the Jews – rabbis or
otherwise – convinced the American Congress of brain-dead zombies that Israel
taught America how to design and produce drones, and that it made the
Palestinian desert bloom.
Why all this? What is Bridget Johnson after? What is the
Jewish establishment trying to achieve? Well, they are laboring to expand the
current war and turn it into a perpetual one. They are terrified by the fact
that ISIS is taking a beating in Iraq
and Syria .
They are also terrified that the Horn of Africa, West Africa and North Africa have quieted down considerably. And they are
terrified that the only instruments left to root for the “strong horse” of bin
Laden are the Jewish publications – which include NPR.