Like a mosaic, society is made of communities that come
together with each of them projecting a small part of the society's overall
image. For example, you'll find that the communities come under headings that
spell business, medical, sports or what have you ... each having both a culture
and a subculture of its own.
An example of the difference which exists between a culture
and the subculture it produces as a byproduct is that of athletes projecting
the image of impeccable role models for youngsters to emulate. That's because
the athletes get in front of the camera and speak a language that's fit for
public viewing. But they also have a locker-room discourse that uses a language
so foul, no parent would want their child to hear.
Depending on the cultural preferences, each society chooses
to define itself under different headings. For example, a religious society
might emphasize the religious components of its mosaic whereas another might
emphasize its secular bent. Because America started as a place of
refuge harboring those who fled religious persecution, it remains largely a
religious society. But it also avoids favoring any one religion by banning
government sanctioned religious expressions in public places. This duality has
allowed the Jewish community to develop a discourse that's fit for public viewing
and another that's used for internal consumption.
The difficulty has always been to figure out what the Jews
were saying to each other in private by analyzing what they said in public.
This situation has now changed thanks to Lee Smith who wrote an article that
sheds light on the matter. The article came under the title: “The Real Story
Behind the Diplomatic Crisis With Qatar” and the subtitle: “It's not the principled
stand against support for terror that it seems to be,” and was published on
June 14, 2017 in the Weekly Standard.
What you see in that article is how the Jews take an
insignificant occurrence, blow it out of proportion, assign to it meanings they
pluck from thin air, and draw false conclusions in support of their point of
view. Thus, you see Lee Smith start with the desire to make the argument that Saudi Arabia , UAE, Bahrain
and Egypt
were motivated by crass considerations, and not by the noble principle of
acting against terror. But as he proceeds to make his point, he forgets he is
writing for public viewing, and gets into the mode of mouthing off a
locker-room style pep talk as if he were behind closed doors talking to junior
propagandists, here to prepare for the journey ahead.
The following is an assertion you encounter early on in the
article: “The crisis splitting the GCC isn't really about extremism. It has
nothing to do with larger issues. It's just Abu Dhabi
waging political warfare against Doha to get the
United States to move its
military base from Qatar
to the UAE.” So you want to know what evidence Lee Smith has which prompts him
to make such an assertion, and write a column about it.
The following is what you find, believe it or not: “The
UAE's ambassador to the U.S.
told reporters that the Trump administration should move the base. He explained
that the UAE hasn't told the U.S.
it should relocate, but is willing to have that conversation. The problem with Qatar , he says,
is that it has supported and sheltered extremists. It's high time that Qatar decides
whether it is 'all in' – or not – in the fight against extremism and
aggression.” Wow! Look here! He said it himself; it's not a crass act, it's a
noble act. He engaged in Jew-talk, something worse than Orwellian talk, thus
unmasked himself as an intellectual fraud.
Sadly, our Jewish author believes he presented solid proof
that Saudi Arabia , the UAE, Bahrain and Egypt were motivated by crass
considerations, and not by the noble principle of acting against terror. In
addition, he omitted mentioning a number of other countries that joined the
boycott of Qatar –
presumably because they too are so ignoble, they wish to see the American base
moved from Qatar
to the UAE.
Now, my friend, you want to know what motivates a Jew to
dive to the bottom of a cesspool and scrape its bottom for a piece of filth he
can stick to people that did nothing to hurt him. And you find this
declaration: “Hypocrisy is a natural and necessary component of competent
statesmanship.” So very Jewish!
In their zeal to project to the world an impeccable image of
themselves, the Jews discovered that the easiest way to do it is to earn credit
by discrediting others. And so, they developed a culture that portrays them as
paragons of perfection, at the same time as they whisper slander against those
who refuse to toe their line.