If you begin with the premise that you can gauge the
strength of freedom and democracy in a jurisdiction by testing the ability of
the people to criticize Jewish and Israeli matters without seeing their career
destroyed, their financial security ruined and their life altered beyond
recognition, you'll have to conclude that the whole world is free and
democratic except for two places in it: America and Palestine.
If freedom and democracy are considered important because
they lead to progress whereas their absence leads to stagnation, we must
conclude that the world has been governed by a system of freedom and democracy
since the beginning of time. That's because humanity has made giant progress
during the time that elapsed from the Stone Age to the Industrial Age. And this
leads to the undeniable reality that the modern definition of freedom and
democracy is nothing more than the codification of a system that has existed
for as long as we have because it is written into our genetic code.
What all this means, is that when it comes to freedom and
democracy, the world had not changed from the very beginning to the time that
the Americans liberated the Jews from the concentration camps of the Second
World War. This is when the Jewish survivors used the noise they generated
about their ordeal to make the Americans who liberated them, pay the price for
what they suffered at the hands of others. Inexplicably and relentlessly
practicing this form of exploitation, the Jews managed to turn America into a
colony bereft of freedom or democracy. This done, they used the country's
resources to extend their dominion over the people of Palestine. And of course,
they tried to go beyond Palestine, but were pushed back.
Have the Jews learned that freedom and the tenets of
democracy –– the right to self-expression –– are as natural to human beings as
it is for all living things to flourish without asking the Jews for permission?
Apparently not. You can see this for yourself by going over the column that came
under the title: “In Turkey and Pakistan, discouraging elections,” written by
Clifford D. May and published on July 31, 2018 in The Washington Times.
To be sure, the positive things that each of Turkey and
Pakistan have contributed to human progress since the beginning of time, are
about a million times as large as the Jewish contribution. But when it comes to
the negative things that Turkey and Pakistan contributed to human civilization,
they rate as little as a millionth what the Jews have inflicted on Planet
Earth. In fact, the Turks were a part of the (Eastern) Roman Empire and then of
the Muslim Empire. As to Pakistan that split from India, it was a part of the
Indian Empire, and then became a part of the Muslim Empire. During all that
time, the Jews went from empire to empire trying to take them over from the
inside, only to be detected and given the incinerator treatment.
Clifford May ignores all that history and pretends that
Planet Earth remained in the Stone Age since the start of the Stone Age, unable
to progress till “freedom and democracy” was codified by the West. He goes on
to say that something good happened when Turkey and Pakistan adopted the
rituals of that system. But he laments that they quickly rejected the system
and went back to the old ways of doing things.
The writer used a whole bunch of pseudo-religious polemics,
and spent a great deal of verbiage to make the point that Turkey and Pakistan
put themselves on the wrong track by rejecting the freedom and democracy of his
imagination. Still, despite all this, the paper trail he generated over the
decades says that Clifford May does not like what Turkey and Pakistan are doing
– not because they rejected what he calls freedom and democracy – but because
of what they stand for: opposition to Israel's ambitions in the region.
This is how May expressed that sentiment at the start of his
article: “Not so long ago, freedom and democracy seemed to be on the march in
Turkey and Pakistan … that turns out to have been an illusion.” And this is how
he ended his discussion: “This is a serious dilemma for Washington policy
makers and for the Turks and Pakistanis who must realize that their homelands
will achieve neither anytime soon,” which ominously sounds like the infamous,
“all options are on the table”.