Professor Lamont Colucci wants the world to believe he came up with a great theory when in fact, what he came up with is only half a theory that has been around for a time. In fact, the full theory is now used regularly with results that satisfy its users.
Colucci articulated his
thoughts in an article he wrote under the title: “US lacking focus on
partnership between Iran and North Korea regimes,” and the subtitle: “Attention
must be directed to root problems, not nuclear weapons data points.” The
article was published on November 28, 2020 in The Washington Times.
Lamont Colucci says that the
Trump administration has been focusing on the data pertaining to the performance
of the missiles which are produced and tested by Iran and North Korea. This is
not helpful, he adds, because what matters is the intention of the two regimes.
They are evil, he asserts, and they intend to harm the United States. This is
where the roots of the problem lie, he concludes, and that's what we need to
address, he goes on to say, not debate the missile data points.
Having mentioned Israel to
point out that Iran developed a missile with a range that's long enough to hit
it, we are surprised to see that the professor has overlooked the diplomatic
performance of the Israelis over the decades. In fact, what the Jewish
propaganda machine has been doing, is use both the data and the intent methods
to brainwash America's political leaders. The propagandists have managed to
make the Americans believe that the armed Jewish home invaders of Palestine are
saints whereas the disarmed Palestinian defenders of their Palestinian homeland
are demons. Try to wrap your head around that.
But how did the Jews manage to
pull it off? Well, the operators of the Jewish propaganda machine have
recognized the necessity to describe different demons differently. For this
reason, you'll find that they reserved the data method to describe the
relationship which the Jews have with the long-term demons they have been
battling since the beginning of time. This would be the entire human race. As
well, the operators of the machine have reserved the intent method to describe
the relationship which the Jews have with the weak demons they have been
suppressing for as long as the two have battled each other. These would be the
disarmed and weakened Palestinians.
Whereas humanity is
represented by the agencies of the United Nations (UN), and whereas a large
subset of that humanity is represented by the American society, the Jews have
been complaining about both with the use the data method. With regard to the
UN, the Jews speak bitterly of the number of times that Israel is condemned at
the UN, as compared to other nations. As well, the Jews have been citing tons
of statistics they say show conclusively that Jews are discriminated against in
America.
But when it comes to their
relationship with the Palestinian people, the operators of the Jewish
propaganda machine speak of the intent of the Palestinians to harm the Jews.
They consider this to be a good reason for the Jews to treat the Palestinians
savagely, even preempt them by target killing them one at a time or a handful
at a time. The Jews see the intent method as necessary to eliminate the damage
that the Palestinians may inflict on the Jews. There may not be evidence that a
Palestinian is planning an operation of any kind, but that is immaterial to the
Israelis who decide to target kill, not on the basis of facts but on the basis
of the level of hate they have for someone.
And so, if the use of the data
method alone is not adequate to suggest the appropriate response to an event,
and if the method of intent alone is not adequate to suggest the appropriate
response to an event, and if the use of both methods leads to savagery as shown
by the behavior of the Israelis, what is the best way to proceed at a time when
the data and the interpretations of intent overwhelm us every moment of the
day?
The short answer is that there
is no rule of thumb. Every case is unique in that it has characteristics proper
to it even if it shares some characteristics with other cases. This means we
are left only with whatever abilities we may possess to analyze the situation,
understand it as well as we can, and go on from there to formulate the best
response we can develop for the situation.
When it comes to Iran and
North Korea, the first thing that the incoming American administration must
remember is that “you cannot keep a good man down for long.” Sooner or later,
he will rise and you'll know you’ve been nudging a once sleeping giant. In this
case, logic dictates that America must treat the two foes with respect by first
ridding itself of the belief that they have such malign intentions, America
must suppress them to protect itself and its people.
But this has been America's stance all along, and staying on this course will have the effect of strengthening the two giants in-the-making even more. When they rise, they will not want to give-and-take with America; they’ll tell it to take a hike and get lost for good.