Can corruption reach criminal levels and yet be protected by law? The answer is yes, and the unfortunate part is that the so-called democracies have become a cauldron fostering this kind of anomalies.
The latest discussion on such
matters came in the form of an article published under the title: “Trump's
disruption and Israel's future,” written by Jonathan Jacoby and Hannah
Rosenthal. It appeared on December 2, 2020 in the New York Daily News.
What Jacoby and Rosenthal are
saying fundamentally, is that due to their history, the Jews have good reasons
to worry about antisemitism when they see it rise in one place or worse, see it
rise everywhere at the same time. The Jews may or may not be oversensitive or
even “shell-shocked,” but they are better equipped than anyone to detect
antisemitism in others, especially in prominent personalities.
In view of that reality,
Jonathan Jacoby and Hannah Rosenthal have determined that Donald Trump is an anti-Semite
at heart, pretending to be otherwise and relying on the antisemitism of others,
as well as the Jewish fear of same, to spread antisemitism where and when he
can. Surprisingly, however, Trump has deftly managed to win the confidence of
rightwing Jews and Evangelicals, say the two authors. It is something he
constantly works on, they contend, then works on fleecing the Jews of their
money while securing their votes at election time. Go figure.
Jacoby and Rosenthal endeavor
to show how that works while explaining how Donald Trump uses his position as
president of the United States to peddle influence in subtle ways, and score
personal gains playing an illegal game. To illustrate the kind of tricks he
pulls off, the writers gave the example of Trump sending his Secretary of State
Mike Pompeo to occupied Palestine where he visited a winery operating in the
West Bank in contravention of international law. While this sleight of hand may
please the rightwing Jews and Evangelicals, it diminishes America's standing in
the world. In sum, Trump gains personally by breaking the law and diminishing
America in the process.
Whereas the Jews are taken
advantage of by politicians such as Trump, their leaders also use influence
peddling to scare their enemies and make gains for their causes. This happens
when the Jews use senators to threaten someone with investigation in an effort
to force them to change their practices even when these are perfectly legal,
normal and useful. An example is Marco Rubio calling for the investigation of
American universities for taking monetary gifts from Arab countries. He accuses
the institutions of being influenced by the donors. Rubio did that while
denying being influenced by the money he receives from his donors.
To see what's happening in
America's universities that Marco Rubio says disturb him, we consult an article
that discusses a pertinent example. The article came under the title: “Are
Universities Producing Anti-Israel Foot Soldiers?” It was written by Irit
Tratt, and printed on December 3, 2020 in the Jewish online publication,
Algemeiner.
After describing the personal
experience, she says she went through while taking a university course on the
Middle East some 20 years ago, Irit Tratt went on to say the following:
“In an article titled 'How
Middle Eastern Governments Encourage Anti-Semitism on Campus,' which appeared
online at Mosaic magazine this year, it was revealed that from 1986-2018,
Middle Eastern Muslim countries donated a total of $6.5 billion to US
universities”.
So that's how––cocooned inside
their protection racket––the influence peddlers work together without appearing
to break the law. What they do, is get the Jewish magazine Mosaic to write an
article that's only good to be flushed in the toilet. But look what the article
intends to do: It slanders the reputation of America's colleges and
universities, as well as the Arab and Muslim countries.
Then Marco Rubio, who is a
male prostitute in a permanent state of being hot to trot, picks up the ball
from there, and threatens action. After that, comes the likes of Irit Tratt and
dozens like her who take turn echoing the same accusatory garbage on and on and
on.
But how do we know the
accusations are garbage. We know because the numbers quoted by Mosaic and
repeated by the inmates of the echo chamber, speak for themselves. For example,
the Tratt-Mosaic article says that in the period between 1986 and 2018 American
universities received 6.5 billion dollars from the Arabs. Well, since there are
32 years in that span of time, it turns out that America's institutions of
higher learning received an average of 203 million dollars each year.
There are hundreds of colleges
and universities in America, but let's take only the top 12. We assume that all
the Arab money goes to them only, and assess what this may cause them to do or
neglect doing.
The Jews say it encourages the
institutions to ignore or even encourage the spread of anti-Semitism on campus
and off campus. So, here is the list of the top 12 current endowments,
expressed in billions of dollars:
Harvard: $ 39.428
Yale: $ 30.314
Stanford: $ 27.700
Princeton: $ 26.116
MIT: $ 17.569
Pennsylvania: $ 14.650
Notre Dame: $ 11.268
Northwestern: $ 11.092
Columbia: $ 10.051
Duke: $ 8.600
Emory: $ 7.872
Cornell: $ 7.328
That comes to a total of about
212 billion dollars.
Having this kind of cash on
hand, and receiving an average of 203 million dollars a year is like having
1044 dollars in your pocket as well as a steady revenue stream, and hating the
Jews when the Arabs so command you. They sweeten their command with an offer to
donate one dollar a year for the next 32 years, provided you keep professing
your hatred for the Jews. Would you do that? Would an American university do
that? Would a sane person do that?
Marco Rubio the prostitute,
and his Jewish johns say yes, they would. Consequently, they want the people of
America to burn down the universities, grab the money they stashed away, and
distribute it among the politicians who run for office. And they promise that
the politicians will not be influenced in any way, shape or form by the
donations. Do you believe that?
All this seems legal on the surface because Democracy as it was conceived originally, has been so corrupted, it now stinks to high heaven.