It has long been accepted by thoughtful people that left to the Jews, the phenomenon of anti-Jewish pogroms and holocausts will never be explained or understood in such a way as to start a process that will lead to the prevention of future pogroms and holocausts.
But why can't the rest of
humanity explain this phenomenon, and start a debate that might highlight
possible solutions, and go from there? Well, the reality is that this too was
made impossible by the attitude of the Jews whose approach clearly indicates
they will neither resolve the problem nor let others resolve it.
It happened that every time
someone started a meaningful debate about the subject, the Jews came down on
their head like the Sword of Damocles and canceled them, never to be heard from
them again. And then it happened that the candidate to start a meaningful
debate was a powerful organization; the kind that the Jews cannot cancel with a
phony accusation, a scary blackmail or a visit to a hungry congressional
zombie.
That organization turned out
to be Lucasfilm that seems to have acted on the basis of, “You want to play the
cancellation game? Well then, here is a cancellation for you.” Upon this,
Lucasfilm fired an actress that saw similarities between the attack on
conservatives in twenty first century America, and the attack on Jews in
twentieth century Europe.
And this is where Beth Bailey
picked up the thread, supposedly to continue the debate that was started by Lucasfilm
about the events that have led to the Holocaust. But the bizarre thing is that
Bailey picked up the thread not to continue developing the logic of the debate,
but to accuse Lucasfilm of canceling the nascent debate/discussion. Here is how
she did it: “The only thing Lucasfilm truly canceled was an opportunity for
much-needed discussion about the Holocaust”.
That sentence, is what Beth
Bailey inserted in the first paragraph of the article she wrote under the
title: “Lucasfilm cancels an opportunity for Holocaust education,” and had it
published on February 20, 2021 in The Washington Examiner. Bailey went from
there to carry on with the one-sided kind of debate that the Jews will only
tolerate. What kind is that, you ask? The kind you see here:
“A survey found that Holocaust
education in the United States is lacking. More than 1 in 10 adults, and 1 in 5
millennials, had not heard of the Holocaust. 45% of adults and 49% of
millennials could not name even one of the 40,000 camps and ghettos the Nazis operated
during World War II. One-third of US adults and 41% of millennials believe
fewer than 2 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust”.
As you can see, this is not
meant to start a debate; it is more like a statement of claims for compensation
that is yet to be filed. It is what Beth Bailey calls, “a much-needed
discussion.” It is also a warning to anyone wishing to participate in this
discussion, that to dare questioning or contradicting the number of Jewish
victims approved by Jewish Central, will cause the Sword of Damocles to fall on
your head. The same applies if you shrug off the significance of those numbers.
Now sensing that this is the
sort of claim with the potential to make the American public resent the always
acquisitive and never satisfied Jews, Beth Bailey sought to buy an insurance
policy to protect against the State and Federal governments in America taking
measures that will put a limit to Jewish appetite for more. To do so, she
studied how Europe has dealt with a similar situation, and then warned against
an American response that will most certainly resemble what she discovered was
implemented in Europe. Here is how she formulated her warning:
“The Third Reich deprived Jews
of their rights. Between 1933 and 1939, 400 official restrictions would oust
Jews from German public life. By 1939, Jews could not sell guns or own carrier
pigeons. They were prohibited from working in medicine, journalism, government
service, and midwifery. They were barred from intermarrying with Aryans and
were not allowed to attend public schools. They had to register all property
worth more than 5,000 Reichsmarks, turn in all precious valuables, adopt the
identifying middle names of Sara or Israel, and stamp their passports with the
letter J”.
You don't need to be a genius
to see why the Germans imposed those restrictions on the Jews. It is obvious
that the latter were then playing the game that their descendants are playing
today. That is, they pretended to be loyal German citizens while using the
strategic positions they were in, to serve (not Israel which did not exist at
the time) but the idea of Zionism itself. They did so by being singularly loyal
to World Jewry, which was the Jewish Central of the era.
Looking at this history,
anyone sane would conclude that the solution to the “Jewish problem” lies in
the Jewish leaders and Jewish parents ending the indoctrination of their
children with principles that make them grow up thinking they are different
from others or worse, superior to others.
But whereas some parents are
no longer indoctrinating their children, preferring instead to let them blend
in the society where they find themselves, the Jewish leaders are adamantly
opposed to such pivot.
Not only that, but the Jewish leaders are asking the State and Federal governments of America to surrender the children of the nation to the rabbis so that they can raise them as philo-Semitic lackeys dedicated to serve the Jews and the Jewish causes; while serving nobody else and nothing else.