It was a long time ago that Alan Dershowitz made himself the voice of Israel in America and by extension, the English speaking world. And it was in this language that he enunciated the constitutional rule from which all other rules concerning Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, are derived.
What the Dershowitz rule says essentially, is that Israel reserves the
right to do to the Palestinians what anyone has done to someone at any time
throughout history. That is, because someone blew up the homes of others,
Israel takes that as a license to blow up Palestinian homes. Because someone
shot a wounded combatant in the head, Israel can do likewise, and in fact did
so in the presence of cameras. Because someone killed youngsters and harvested
their organs, Israel does not regret doing the same thing. The list is long and
you get the picture.
When the Jews complained that the United Nations condemned Israel more
than it did all the other jurisdictions combined, and they wanted to know why,
they were told privately that Israel violated the code of decency more than the
other jurisdictions combined. It is like each of the others had one sewer pipe carrying
its waste, and Israel was the septic tank that took in the discharge of all the
sewers.
This is what was told to the Jews privately in the hope that they will
feel the shame of humanity’s criticism, and press Israel to stop acting with
cynicism. In other words, the message to Israel was short and clear: If you
don’t like our criticism, stop your cynicism. But needless to say that talking
to these people was like talking to the wall. Words went into one ear and out
the other.
The Judeo-Israeli attitude that observers of the situation in occupied
Palestine find most offensive is that which describes the typical Jew as being
the only thief in all of human history who will not protect himself by lying or
pleading for mercy, but will attack his victims by hurtling insults at them.
The fashion these days is for the Jew to call his victims antisemitic bigots
and other similar names. While it was easy for the Jew to insult those who saw
fault in his behavior, it was near to impossible for a victim or an observer to
describe the nature of the complaint against the Jew. It was like trying to
nail gelatin to the wall.
But the Israelis and their Jewish supporters in America have pushed
their luck so much beyond the limit of tolerance, they created an opportunity
for someone to make the gelatin stick to the wall. You can see how this came
about when you read the article that came under the title: “Warning by
Jerusalem Church Leaders That Christians Face Threat to Presence in Holy Land
is ‘Baseless’: Israeli Government,” written by Sharon Wrobel and published on December
21, 2021 in the Jewish publication Algemeiner.
Once you get past that title as you read the article, you feel slapped
in the face by the writer who tells the story out of sequence. Whereas a normal
person would say: Here is what happened in the Holy Land, and here is what
Israel said about it, Sharon Wrobel began with the Israeli denial, then
explained what it is that was being denied. Here is that typical formulation of
how the Jewish mind operates:
“Israel has rebuffed accusations by Church leaders that ‘fringe, radical
groups’ are attempting to drive Christians out of the Holy Land as ‘baseless’
and a distortion of reality”.
Thus, beside showing that the dyslexic Jewish mind will put the cart
before the horse, Sharon Wrobel has shown how addicted to lies Israel really
is. She has shown that instead of Israel expressing astonishment at the
complaint lodged by the Church leaders and promising to investigate, Israel
immediately responded by counter-accusing the church leaders of leveling
baseless accusations, and of distorting reality. This means that Israel was
familiar with the situation, did nothing about it, denied it and denied even
knowing about it … all that in one fell swoop. But if you think this was going
beyond the pale, wait till you see the size of the Jewish pale.
Study carefully the following paragraph, which is a passage from Sharon
Wrobel’s article quoting a spokesman of the Israeli Foreign Ministry, reprinted
here verbatim. It will blow your mind:
“‘Religious leaders have a critical role to
play in education for tolerance and coexistence, and Church leaders should be
expected to understand their responsibility and the consequences of what they
have published, which could lead to violence and bring harm to innocent
people,’ stated Israeli Foreign Ministry Spokesman Lior Haiat”.
How much Jewish bull can someone pack in a 50-word sentence? The Israeli
spokesman made 3 cosmic size accusations as if he were looking in the mirror
and describing what he was seeing.
First, he treated the Church leaders as ignorant of what their duties
entail, and so he lectured them on what they were missing concerning the matter
of “education for tolerance and coexistence”.
Second, he accused Church leaders of falling short of what’s expected of
them, which is to understand the consequences of them complaining about Israel’s
treatment of Christians in Jerusalem.
Third, he made the often kept terroristic promise that if the world will
not let Israel complete its ethnic cleansing of Palestine without opposition,
Israel will employ the genocidal method. The words of the Israeli spokesman
were to the effect that telling the world what Israel was doing “could lead to
violence and bring harm to innocent people.” This always meant that Israel will
bomb Palestinian women and children, a promise that was always kept.
And of course, the Judeo-Israeli bunch, including Sharon Wrobel, could
not leave the subject without injecting a bit of the Dershowitz DNA into it.
Here is how they did it:
“The statement by Church leaders is infuriating given their silence on
the plight of Christian communities in the Middle East suffering from
persecution”.