The neocons who are the former liberals that converted to conservatism because—like they say—they were mugged by reality, seem to have been mugged again by the other side of the same reality.
According to the neocons, the reality that mugged them the first time
was the realization that the conservative system of small government, low
taxation, strong defense, private property and laissez-faire economics was
superior to whatever the liberals were advocating.
While this is the neocons’ official version behind the ideas and events that
led to their conversion, the history books of the future will tell a different
story. They will say that those who were first to convert from liberalism to
conservatism were fanatic Jews steeped in the Marxist-Leninist ideology. They
loved this ideology because it advocated a single government for the world,
which they believed they could then hijack and make it their own whether the
messiah will come to bless the event or prove to be a hoax.
However, when the Soviet Union, on which the Jews had pinned their
hopes, proved too weak to deliver on their dream, they looked at the conservative
system. They saw that it promised as much as did the liberal system—and a little more. In fact, they saw an America
and its NATO allies dominating almost everywhere in the world. They salivated,
and immediately started a program to conquer an America that itself, had
already conquered most of the world. When you have Uncle Sam in your pocket
snoring his nostrils off, who needs Uncle Stalin on your shoulder whispering directives
in your ear?
But then, what did happened that caused the Jews to feel mugged a second
time? Did they lose faith in the ability of conservatism to deliver on small
government, low taxation, strong defense, private property or laissez-faire
economics? No, that’s not it. In fact, saying so was a cover meant to hide the
truth about the Jews seeing America as being in a better position than the
Soviet Union to help Socialist Israel conquer the Middle East and go from there
to conquer the world. Who needs the messiah or Karl Marx when they can have
America—Milton Friedman or no Milton Friedman?
That’s when reality mugged the Jewish neocons a second time. What
happened was that after they completed their takeover of America, America disappointed
them by suffering a series of failures. This got the Jews to wish that the
messiah would hurry and come down to give them back their old dream.
You can read all about this part of the story in an opinion piece that
came under the title: “Failure in the Iran nuclear talks,” and the subtitle:
“US and Israel are looking for Plan B.” It was written by Abraham Wagner, and
published on December 28, 2021 in The Washington Times.
That piece was published on the indicated date but was written a few
hours earlier. Events overtook it, thus made it sound a little outdated. This
is why it will be a good idea to read it in conjunction with a news item that
was published later that same day, containing new information about the same
subject. The news item came under the title: “Iran expects Biden will cave in ‘presumably
final round’ of nuclear talks,” written by Joel Gehrke, and published on
December 28, 2021 in The Washington Examiner.
Once you’ve read the two articles, you’ll be struck by the contrast you’ll
have detected in their moods. You’ll sense that Gehrke’s news item is
optimistic about the negotiators in Vienna reaching an agreement soon whereas
Abraham Wagner’s opinion piece predicts failure to reach an agreement.
Here is how Joel Gehrke ended the news item:
“Russian Ambassador Mikhail Ulyanov suggested that the
two sides would try to move quickly to a breakthrough. He twitted that the
participants held businesslike and result-oriented discussions. In particular
they agreed to intensify the drafting process in order to achieve an agreement
ASAP”.
And here is how Abraham Wagner ended his opinion piece:
“For now, there is
acceptance that there will be no new agreement. Iran may approach or cross the threshold in becoming a
nuclear power, and that Plan B may consist of defensive technologies. Added to
this will be the need for realistic thinking about deterrence. Without
realistic thinking, the Middle East may face a prospect nobody wants”.
It looks like the talks in Vienna will soon reveal whose mood was
correct. But regardless of the outcome, what is it about Abraham Wagner’s
article that should tell the foreign policy officials in Washington what has gone
badly for America in the past, and what must be avoided in the future?
What made it difficult for America to understand the proverbial “other,”
thus wasted every chance it had to solve whatever disputes it had with them, is
the polluted ecosystem that pundits such as Abraham Wagner have been creating
around the individuals, institutions and countries they turned into enemies of
America simply because they were indifferent toward Israel.
For example, when in the early 1970s OPEC decided to raise the price of
oil, the Jews polluted the debating space in America by describing the
situation as if the Arab countries were holding the gun to America’s head, and
forcing the oil companies to act as tax collectors in the business of extorting
money from the American public and giving it to the Arabs. In no time at all did
everyone that mentioned oil, started to speak in those vile terms.
This purely Jewish nauseating trick did not bring down the price of oil.
It only made it difficult for America to negotiate the subject with the Arabs, and
with everyone else in the oil business. In a similar fashion and according to
that same mentality, here is what Abraham Wagner is doing now:
“Iran has
engaged in an extortion effort as a price for entering new talks, demanding the
US release of $10 billion of frozen Iranian funds to prove the seriousness of
its intentions”.
Imagine the American negotiators sitting at the table in Vienna, hearing
Wagner’s voice echo in their heads: These Iranians are trying to extort from
America the money that is theirs. But theirs or not theirs, how dare they do
such a thing?