Get this: Decades ago Israel told the world that the best defense is a good offense. And ever since that time, the Jews of Israel and their cohorts in America have been making a mockery of the concept known as self-defense.
For example, under the guise that they can read the mind of
others, the Jews have regularly advanced the accusation that someone was up to
no good. Based on this alone, they launched preemptive attacks against those others,
and called their own actions self-defense. When the victims defended
themselves, the Jews howled their pain, pretending that they were terrorized by
those they were victimizing.
You can imagine that in a world that’s turned upside down by
the Jews, it is possible that someone like Kanye West may have been confused or
may have used the Jewish definition of defense to address an issue he knew they
will blow out of proportions. What Kanye West did deliberately, at least
according to Clifford May, was use the military invented acronym DEFCON (defense
condition) to say he is going on the offense against the Jews.
But why would Clifford May go through all that trouble? You’ll
know why he did so when you read the article he wrote under the title: “United
Nations goes DEFCON 3 on Israel,” and the subtitle: “Global bureaucrats are
less angry with Putin, Xi, and Khamenei.” The article was published in The
Washington Times on October 25, 2022.
In fact, the title of the article alone gave away Clifford
May’s intention. Instead of associating Kanye West with DEFCON 3, which is what
the discussion is supposed to be about, May associated the acronym with the
United Nations. He then tossed in Putin, Xi and Khamenei to thicken the plot of
what’s coming next.
But what can be Clifford May’s ultimate aim in all of this?
Well, knowing that he and the other Jewish leaders made
inevitable an anti-Jewish blowup that’s almost certain to happen in America –
and that the political elites are aware of – Clifford May does not take
seriously the expressions of sorrow mouthed by those elites as they see
antisemitism spread and deepen throughout the land. He knows that those elites
shed crocodile tears to protect themselves for when the blowup will happen and
everyone will be called to account for what they did or failed to do to protect
the Jews. The excuse of the elites will be that they expressed sorrow at the
antisemitism of others, therefore cannot be blamed for what happened.
But Clifford May does not care about any of that. His aim is
to exploit the current situation all he can, and use it to enrich Israel by
fleecing America when he can, and glorify Israel by denigrating America if he
must. And so, given that the musings of Kanye West generated a negative
reaction among the elites of America – however phony that reaction may have been
– Clifford May thought it beneficial to associate Kanye West’s utterings with
those of Israel’s archenemies: Putin, Xi and Khamenei. Hence the article that lumps
together the UN, DEFCON, Putin, Xi, and Khamenei.
But the question still remains: What’s Clifford May trying
to accomplish with that article?
Surprisingly, here we have a member of the crowd that brays:
“You can’t compaaaare, you can’t compaaaare,” starting his article by comparing
what he calls the Jewish people, with the activities of Putin, Xi Jinping and
Khamenei. Basically, what Clifford May is saying here, is that the Jews are
good whereas the others are evil. This, in fact, is the only comparison the
Jews will ever allow to be made between themselves and others.
Satisfied of what he has accomplished, Clifford May proceeded
to mention what Kanye West had muttered, then quickly associated those words
with the Commission of Inquiry (COI) that was set-up by the UN Human Rights Council
(UNHRC)—in
his words—“for the express
purpose of demonizing and delegitimizing Israel in perpetuity”. Can paranoia
ever exceed a case such as that?
This done, however, Clifford May went on to repeat the Jewish talking
points that have been debunked time after time throughout the years and
decades. But he ended this article with something that is both new and
puzzling. It reads as follows:
“The UN’s self-proclaimed ‘central mission’ is to prevent conflict, help
parties in conflict make peace, and create ‘the conditions to allow peace to
hold and flourish.’ Regarding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the COI and the
UNHRC instead send the message that Palestinians should seek ways to peacefully
coexist with their Jewish cousins. To them, clearly, Jewish lives don’t matter.
But they regard Palestinian lives as cheap, too. What other conclusion can we
draw when they incessantly give Palestinians incentive to kill and be killed?”
This forces us to pose the question: What’s the difference between—on
the one hand—helping the parties in conflict to create conditions that will allow
peace to flourish … on the other hand, urging the parties to seek ways to coexist?
It sounds like a distinction without much of a difference.