Bear with me for a moment and look at the juxtaposition of the following three sentences and phrases.
First, there is this: The wrong way to fight
antisemitism.
And then, there is this: comparing antisemitism to all other forms of bigotry
fails to acknowledge the particularities associated with antisemitism.
And finally, there is this: the study found that nearly half of Jewish respondents
think antisemitism is taken less seriously than other forms of hate or bigotry.
What should that say to you? It should say that the
rabbis of an earlier era succeeded at getting things done their way when they
brayed: “You can’t compaaaaare, you can’t compaaaaare.” They got their wish
fulfilled when society stopped comparing antisemitism to other forms of
bigotry, saying in effect: You Jews wish to be different? So be it. But you won’t
be taken more seriously than anyone else. You’ll be different alright, but
you’ll also be taken less seriously than the rest of us.
That’s what prompted Irit Tratt to write an article
under the title: “The Wrong Way to Fight Antisemitism,” published on October 9,
2022 in Algemeiner. So, why do you think she is whining now? She is whining
because in her words: “antisemitism is [at
times] compared to other forms of bigotry, thus failing to acknowledge the
particularities associated with antisemitism.” Here we go again. As pointed out
over and over, and warned against taking such approach through the ages, the
good woman wants to do the same thing while expecting a different result. What
was it they said about madness?
But what is it in the Judeo-Yiddish culture that makes
these people wish they were perceived the same as everyone else, yet treated
differently from what such perception would entail? The answer to that question
is found in the Jewish belief that they are the chosen children of God. They
feel they are superior to humanity and deserve to be treated as such. Because
this is not happening at this time, however, they are willing to settle for
being treated as equals—but only if society would simultaneously acknowledge
their supremacy, as do the weirdoes of some far right religious groups.
What the Jews of the Irit Tratt mentality expect will result
from the acknowledgement by humanity that they are superior, goes beyond being
treated with respect in America and the Western World. The Jews expect that such
acknowledgement will give force to the Zionist movement which continues to be
attacked by foes as well as some friends of Israel. In addition, a universal
acknowledgement that the Jews are superior will make a statement like the one
that follows, accepted as undeniable reality:
“The Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) is virulently anti-Zionist, with its co-founder and
executive director, expressing support for terrorist groups like Hamas,
calling Tel Aviv ‘occupied,’ and with numerous CAIR staff members explicitly
supporting Palestinian terrorism”.
That is, in the on-again, off-again war between the
indigenous Palestinian defenders of Palestine and the foreign Jewish invaders,
the Jews rather than the Palestinians will henceforth be given the benefit of
the doubt when it comes down to the designation: Who is victim and who is terrorist?
When this moment will have arrived, the Jewish invaders will have a free hand
to openly implement their long cherished plan of grabbing all of Palestine without
being opposed by the rest of humanity.
Fortunately for the world and for the Palestinians, this
is not what’s happening at this time. In fact, even worse for the Jews, instead
of seeing their plan implemented by the relentless portrayal as terrorist every
Palestinian who resists the occupation of their land, the Jews gave rise to a
new pro-Palestinian movement; one that started to establish itself throughout
America and the Western World. Here is how that movement was described in the
Irit Tratt article:
“The implications regarding a
misdirected approach to fighting antisemitism are pivoting into dangerous
territory. In a recent op-ed, Kenneth
Marcus explains how several law student groups at the University of California,
Berkeley’s School of Law are creating Jewish-free zones by amending their
bylaws to exclude speakers who support Zionism (which is supported by an
overwhelming super-majority of Jews)”.
It is obvious that Irit
Tratt has failed to see that the relentless Jewish slander of their victims—calling
them terrorists when the whole world knows
that terror is perpetrated by none other than the Jews—has caused ordinary
people to tell those Jews they are not welcome in civilized society. And
despite them being frightened by this development, the Jews still think it is a
good idea to repeat the failures of the past. Here is how Irit Tratt expressed that
madness yet again:
“For the Jewish community to
successfully confront antisemitism, it must first be willing to define the
particularities that enable its growth, and reckon with its unique nature, one
that defies the paradigm through which we view other hatreds. Until then,
anti-Zionists will be more than willing to step in and help frame the
conversation for us”.
Day by day, it becomes increasingly clearer that, gripped tightly by the Judeo-Yiddish culture as they are, these people are doomed to perish without any hope of someone coming to their rescue.