I was a freshman in college at the start of the era during which the Personal Computer (PC) proliferated.
This was the time when I learned what experiment you can
do to determine the level of intelligence enjoyed by whatever it is you’re
assessing.
What you did was count the number of times that the
subject whose intelligence you’re measuring would repeat an action that does
not change anything – before abandoning it.
I learned that the computer sits at the bottom rung
because it is devoid of indigenous intelligence. The proof is that if you
program it to display a sequence and replay it, the computer will do so
indefinitely.
At a higher step sit the birds that make nests with mud
and straws. If, while the bird is away fetching building material, you break a
piece of the nest, the bird will repair the damage before doing anything else.
And if you keep breaking that same piece, the bird will keep repairing it — but
not forever. It will get tired eventually and abandon the repair job, if not
the nest itself.
At a step higher than the bird, sits the human being. If
he tries something and fails, he may try it once or twice more to make sure
he’s going about it the right way. If that does not yield a different result,
the human will summon the full force of his intellect to find out why this is happening,
then works on fixing what’s there to be fixed or change his approach entirely.
There is however one small exception to that last case.
It is that a group of humans calling themselves Jews respond to something that
repeats itself the way that a computer-controlled robot does. In fact, Jews
keep repeating the same mistake an insane number of times. They get the same
catastrophic response each time and never relent.
Two recent articles that were written by Jews, highlight
that reality. One article came under the title: “I’ve Been Asked to Help Tackle Antisemitism
at George Washington University,” and the subtitle: “Here’s What I Plan
to Do.” It was written by Sabrina Soffer and published on March 13, 2023 in
Algemeiner. The other article came under the title: “The Biden White House Drove the
Saudis into China’s Arms” and the subtitle: “Now the Saudis have fully repaid Biden for his
spitefulness, and then some.” It was written by Noah Rothman and published on
March 13, 2023 in National Review Online.
Reading the two articles, you get deeply disappointed
because of what they show and what they fail to show. What the articles show,
is that the Jews have not changed their approach in centuries. What they fail
to show is that the Jews are not even disposed to change despite a long history
of insanely repeating the same mistakes and getting the same catastrophic responses.
Sabrina Soffer begins her presentation by quoting others
– with whom she agrees – who said that “political debates” are self-defeating.
Why is that, you ask? She explains that “the emotional and often-times ‘uncritical’
approach aggravates partisan divides.” But the reality is that what Soffer has
called “debate” is no debate. It is the haggling of interlocuters, disguised as
debate. It is talking past each other without addressing the concerns of the
other interlocuter.
Unable to differentiate between civilized debate and Jewish haggling,
Sabrina Soffer proceeded with her presentation. She did so, not by sticking to
the rules of debate but sticking to those of the haggle. That is, she did not
take into account the concerns of humanity with regard to the Jewish attitude of
constantly projecting the supremacist image of Jews and Israel as being perfect.
This makes them the envy of an imperfect world — they insidiously intimate — a
world that needs the Jew who will impose on it the Hebrew tikkun olam,
thus make it safer for the Jews, and better for all of humanity.
In fact, it is this Jewish attitude that called on her to get involved
and tackle antisemitism at the university where she and other “campus watchers”
do more than watch what the students say and do. They also watch the professors
in the classrooms, and do not hesitate to interrupt them if they feel that the
professors did not paise Israel enough or did not condemn Israel’s chosen enemy
of the day.
As to Noah Rothman, his advice to President Biden is that he should
stick to the Jewish tried an proven to fail strategy of repeating the
ballistic approach of ploughing his way in the realm of foreign policy with no
plan B, and no course correction in case Plan A proves inadequate. His article
is nothing more than a dissertation that voices the Jewish lamentation about a
Biden administration being hostile to Saudi Arabia at a time when the Jews of
Israel would give an arm and a leg to get access to that country using the
American institutions that work for Israel pretending to work for America.
The following is a condensed version of what Rothman says which shows
that his ultimate concern is the suppression of the Palestinian effort to
regain some form of control over their stolen homeland:
“Foreign-policy analysts are concerned
by the setback to America’s strategic efforts to foster the development of an
anti-Iranian bloc of nations in the Middle East. From Day One, the White House
made it a priority to alienate the Saudi government. Biden leaned into the
notion that there could be no enduring peace in the region without a resolution
to the many outstanding issues in the Palestinian territories. ‘While we
support normalization between Israel and countries in the Arab world,’ State
Department spokesman Ned Price clarified, ‘it’s also not a substitute for
Israeli–Palestinian peace’’’.