Authoritarian Artificiality vs. Natural Democracy

Intent on being his true self to the end, William (Bill) Kristol is offering the example of his person to the world as a case study on the realities of authoritarianism as compared to the realities of democracy. He wrote in this vein: “Our Once-In-A-Lifetime President” and published it on April 5, 2015 in the Weekly Standard.

Before I discuss what's in that piece, let me tell you what prepared me for this discussion. I was in my pre-teen years and then my teen years when I attended a catholic school run by Christian brothers during the decade of the 1950s. Pope Pius XII was reigning at the time, and there was controversy about his handling of a few matters pertaining to the war that had ended a number of years earlier. Needless to say that those matters were way above our heads – the children that we were. But some things remained in my memory, and I had the opportunity to ruminate over them when I matured years later.

Two ideas drummed into my head during the early years, clashed when I was able to reason independently. I accepted the notion that every era required a pope with qualifications to suit it. But the question lingered: was the pope chosen by cardinals who were thinking independently, or was he chosen by Divine Will acting through these cardinals?

How I ultimately resolved this question is of no consequence now that so much water has gone under the bridge, and so much has changed in my life as well as my thinking. Suffice it to say that later in life, as I began to think of the systems of governance which exist in this world, I found myself using the same kind of thinking and the same kind of analysis to resolve some questions in my head.

This brings me to the Bill Kristol article. The whole point of his presentation is to express a profound indignation at President Obama who views this opportunity as a “once-in-a-lifetime” event. To Kristol, this means that: “only Barack Obama, Barack Obama truly believes, can make this historic and transformative deal happen.” Which, in turn, leads Kristol to believe that Obama seeks: “for this special moment, in this once-in-a-lifetime moment [that] all should step aside, and all should defer to our once-in-a-lifetime president.”

Well, the thing that can be said is that the saying “once-in-a-lifetime” means we have a number of unique occurrences converging naturally at the same time. For example, Iran has reached a point in the development of its nuclear infrastructure never seen before. It has elected a president with a temperament that is new to the Iranian revolution. Also, the American people twice elected a president that does not believe in “you're with us or you're against us” but is willing to sit and negotiate even with “rogue nations.” All that makes this moment a special one, never to be duplicated naturally.

Thus, for someone like William Kristol to sweep it aside, and then propose the creation of an artificial situation that will be tweaked to bring about a preconceived outcome – one to replace the natural outcome that would result from the Obama approach – is to kill the democratic form of decision making which comes naturally to human beings, and replace it with the authoritarian form of decision making. And this will be of the kind that the Jewish ideology fabricates all the time and seeks to impose on the world.

You can see how Kristol prepares the reader to accept that artificiality. He mentions at the start that Obama claims the existence of a “basic structural and strategic case for the deal on both sides.” He then speculates: “It's a case that would presumably hold two or five or ten years from now, and for that matter it's one that presumably held two or five or ten years ago.” There are two presumptions here, each referring to three possibilities of the kind that nature never repeats in the exact same way.

Only someone who believes in the oxymoron of a stagnant evolution would say what Kristol is saying. But he does not believe a word of what he is saying because he looks forward to the time when Obama will no longer be president. When this happens, he hopes that he and people like him – using all the artificial means at their disposal – will persuade the next president to implement their agenda, and shove it down the throat of the American people and the world.

This would be the Jewish thing to do. And he is eager to do it.

The Jewish Method of debasing 'Friends'

How did the Israelis and the leaders of America's Jews manage to push the former Superpower into so many wars and so many conflicts in the Middle East and Southeast Asia, thus ruining the finances of the country, and lowering its standing in the world … down to a level of uselessness heretofore attributable only to Israel and the Jewish ideology?

They did it by playing a version of the game they now play in the effort to push America into a conflict with Iran. This is one that has the potential, not only to ruin America's finances and its standing in the world, but to bury it like a dead corpse. In fact, the Israelis and the American Jews are telling the mentally retarded in the Congress to kill the nuclear deal that was worked out between the (P5+1) and Iran, while ratcheting up the sanctions till Iran accepts the “Western” conditions which are yet to be specified.

The idea behind this plan is to steer the American-Iranian situation to a place that is similar to where the Israeli-Palestinian situation stands at this time. It is that, having gotten all that they could from the Palestinians, and having kept the door open for themselves to do as they wish, the Israelis froze the situation at a point where the Palestinians are maintained in a paralyzed state while the Israelis are given a free hand to steal more and more of the Palestinian lands and properties.

In a similar fashion, the Israelis and their Jewish collaborators in America are advocating the freezing of the situation pertaining to the nuclear deal with Iran, at a point where they envisage the Iranians being kept in a paralyzed state, and the Western powers having a free hand at destroying the Iranian economy bit by bit and sanction by sanction. This is how the open ended Jewish game of never having a plan B or an exit strategy is designed; the reason why it always fails … if not right away, then later on.

Perhaps what encourages the Jewish leaders of America to push for the playing of this game on the Iranians, is that they see how well they have succeeded at paralyzing the American Congress when it comes to conducting America's business while fast-tracking Israel's business as if America had no other priorities. What the Jews fail to see, however, and what no one is telling them, is that resentment is slowly building in the hearts of Americans. It is the kind of resentment that explodes without warning but with the potential to cause irreparable damage.

As to the Palestinian question, what must have looked like a cakewalk to the Israelis and their American supporters, is now beginning to look like a nightmare in the making … with the Palestinians taking their case to the international institutions. This happened because the Israelis pushed the Palestinians into realizing that the Americans were not the honest brokers they pretended to be but were the accomplices of Israel in the commission of crimes against humanity that have been inflicted on them for at least the past twenty years.

And now, there is the potential for horrific damage to be inflicted on America and the world, with the Jewish push to have the Americans reject the deal they worked out between themselves, their partners and Iran. However, unlike the Palestinians who had no choice but to go along and play the Jewish game when it was imposed on them, the Iranians cannot be compelled to play the game … as indeed, they have indicated they will not.

Cornered by the Jews, as it always happens, America is now left with no peaceful pathway to come out the corner in which the Jewish leaders have pushed it. The former superpower is now left with no choice but to force its way out, which means it will hurt people in the process. This is something it could do without, having lived for too long already by stepping on the necks of innocent people; an activity that made it lose their respect; one that turned them into revenge-seeking enemies.

In short, the Jewish habit of continually starting new adventures and pushing “friends” into situations that have neither a plan B nor an exist strategy, may seem like winning strategies at first; but they always end up in disaster for the Jews and their friends. This is why the Jews have run out of friends … except for the Americans whose Congress is populated by the mentally retarded.

But the time is approaching when even the mentally retarded Americans will wake up and tell the Jews to walk into the hell of their making by themselves because America has better things to do.

Meet panicky Bill Kristol in candid Mode

Usually when someone is seen to be abnormally agitated, those around him wonder what he had for breakfast. Sometimes they even ask each other if they know, or if they would guess what he may have had for breakfast.

Well, something like that must have happened to William Kristol who is the editor of the Weekly Standard. The difference – it seems – is that his agitation could have been triggered, not by something he ate in the morning, but something he read in the morning. In fact, he says this much himself.

He wrote a special editorial on the morning of April 4, 2015 under the title: “Kill the Deal,” published in the Weekly Standard before noon. Abridged, the first sentence reads as follows: “Commentators have exposed the Iran deal in various ways; the point, however, is to kill it.” And he says he has two main reasons why he wants to see that thing dead. One reason has to do with the whole deal, he says; the other has to do with its parts.

But who is William (Bill) Kristol? He is a half Jew whose Jewish father is credited for the creation of the notorious Neocon movement. Besides being the editor of the Weekly Standard, Bill is chairman of the board at some outfit calling itself Emergency Committee for Israel. Its aim is to scour the world for people who could be persuaded to support Israel, but so far has been able to attract and buttonhole only the wretched, the miserable, the woeful, the despicable and the deplorable … those who are already shaped in the image of Israel.

The parts of the deal Kristol does not like are (1) the sanctions relief will be granted too fast; (2) the number of centrifuges Iran is allowed to retain is too high and (3) the inspections regime is not robust enough. But even if these objections were taken care of, he says, there is still the matter of (4) Iran keeping its nuclear infrastructure; (5) the sanctions coming off at some point in the future and (6) Iran's ability to kick out the inspectors has not been restrained or prohibited.

With regards to what he dislikes about the deal as a whole; it is that “Iran, a state-sponsor of terror, an enemy of the US, a jihadist power, a regime dedicated to the destruction of Israel, will become a threshold nuclear weapons state.” He goes on to say that the deal is a set of concessions to a regime with a history of cheating. And he laments that the US and its partners are ignoring that regime's past and present actions. And this, my friend, prompts the question: If America and its partners – who stand to suffer from the actions of that regime – are not disturbed by its actions, why is he – Bill Kristol, Chairman of the Emergency Committee for Israel – disturbed by them? And why is he so agitated about the whole thing?

The answer is obvious. It is that he worries about Israel. He does not believe that Iran will bomb Israel out of existence because if he did, someone would have declared him insane by now, and would have worked hard to lock him up. So then, what is he worried about? He worries that the rise of Iran will accelerate the exposition of Israel as a trivial Third World entity that will never rise above being a parasite; one that will forever need assistance to remain afloat and look like a viable something.

To save Israel from having to meet that fate, and save the Jewish Establishment in America from losing its influence if that happened, Kristol suggests that the Congress adopt the Corker-Menendez bill. He also advocates advancing legislation or amendments that will be designed to kill the particulars of the deal. Doing this – as the saying goes – will kill the deal by a thousand cuts.

To show how transparent he and those like him can be when it comes to advocating the ruin of America and the shedding of American blood, Kristol admits: “We believe sanctions, sabotage, and the threat of military force can better constrain the Iranian regime's nuclear weapons program. We also say openly that airstrikes to set back the program are preferable to this deal.”

Thus, he calls on members of the Congress to do their duty. In the eyes of the world, this means working for Israel doing the things that will ruin America and kill its young. He does not see it that way, however, because he has convinced himself that the world believes him when he says he only wants the Congress to check the powers of the president as stipulated in the Constitution.

But he does not realize that he betrayed himself when he ended the article by repeating the mantra which broke America's back in Iraq: the world's most dangerous weapons in the hands of the most dangerous regime.

The Wailing Wall has a new Look

The real wall where the Jews go to wail whatever they feel deserves to be wailed at, is made of stone and situated in occupied Jerusalem … somewhere out there in the Middle East. But in this modern electronic age, wailing walls of a different kind are springing up almost everywhere a Jew lives or works.

These are computer screens made of plastic, and where many a Jew bangs at the keyboard to wail at the fate that their self-appointed leaders wrought for them. The sad part is that the Jewish rank and file does not realize they suffer what their leaders are doing to them; nor do the leaders admit their shortcomings, let alone move to change their ways and stop inflicting more pain on what they call their people.

And because history has a way of coming full circle without repeating itself in the exact same manner, the once cocky leaders who presented themselves to the rank and file as saviors who will take them to the promised nirvana of a Jewish homeland – are themselves wailing the fate that hit them by surprise. Instead of meeting the Jewish glory they thought will shine so bright that heads from the four corners of the world will turn in their direction, they find themselves empty-handed and wallowing in lamentations and self-pity.

This is what Reuel Marc Gerecht and Mark Dubowitz of the comical troupe calling itself Foundation for Defense of Democracies, are expressing in their latest creation; the one that came under the title: “Iran's Negotiating Triumph Over Obama and America” and the subtitle: “The U.S. is surrendering control of verification to the United Nations, where our influence is weak.” It was published on April 4, 2015 in the Wall Street Journal.

Whereas human beings are wired to see that mutual destruction is a lose-lose situation, and see compromise as a win-win situation, the Jewish ideology that motivates the Jewish leaders says that compromise is a zero-sum game where one side wins all, and the other loses all. That Jewish position is expressed in the first sentence of our two authors: “Obama believes that the nuclear framework is a historic achievement. Iran's Zarif says he believes the same. Those two positions are incompatible.”

In trying to make it look like America and the world lost what Iran has gained, Gerecht and Dubowitz begin by unleashing a diatribe against the Iranians so as to establish that they are the bad guys who deserve only to have bombs rain on their heads. This done, they avoid having to explain in detail why the framework negotiated with them is a bad deal for America or the world, saying only that because the Iranians are as bad as the actors that came before them, they too will cheat on the agreement.

And, of course, the two authors would not be Jews if they did not make predictions that never come to pass. Here is one set of predictions: “billions of dollars of Iranian trade starts to flow to European and Asian companies … The US will be dealing with a UN even more divided, and more incapable of action.” Here is another set: “The UN's IAEA can do good work when the Security Council is unified. Its utility plummets when the council is divided … It is perverse to think that the IAEA can now serve as a safeguard against future Iranian cheating … the president's 'snap-back' sanctions will also surely fall victim to the Security Council's politics and human greed.”

Still another set of predictions: “the deal will fracture the Western alliance. We will lose the French. Faced with other countries rushing to the Iranian market, the French will abandon us, as they did with Iraq 20 years ago. Without them, economic sanctions on Iran would never have had much European bite.”

When you get to this point, you ask yourself a simple question: What ultimately do these people want? Ironically, you find the answer in the question that the two authors ask. It is this: Are you willing to threaten war to get a better deal, and preventively strike?

And that, my friend, serves neither America nor the world. It serves Israel, only Israel and no one but Israel. For this reason the Jewish authors call on: “the putative leader of Senate Democrats, Charles Schumer [the Jew] to walk away from the president's handiwork, and oblige [that American] to threaten war?”

In the meantime, they continue to wail at the computer keyboard, now serving as the new Wailing Wall for the Jews: “In all the framework's details, the senators will find hope like a pilgrim in the desert looking at the horizon and seeing a mirage.” Let them wail away the sorrows they have inflicted on their followers for centuries.

The Asterisk that counts the most

If you have been around children between the ages of 3 and 6, or if you remember yourself at that age, you can tell that the fictitious example which follows is not an exaggeration. It is the story of a child at that age who looks everyday at the house being built across the street and tells her mother that the house looks bad because it does not have a red roof like the one beside it. And the mother keeps telling the child that the roof is the last thing they install on a house … and so she'll have to wait till this happens.

This is what comes to mind when you listen to the supposed grownups who whine about one thing or another that is still missing in what has been negotiated up to now between the world powers. And this is what you see in the piece that was written by the editorial team at the Wall Street Journal under the title: “Obama's Iran 'Framework'*” which also came under the subtitle: “*Details to be disclosed, and even negotiated, later.” It was published on April 3, 2015.

To be sure, this is not the first time that something like this has happened. In fact, Henry Kissinger was hounded by the child-like grownups who incessantly barked at him during the SALT negotiations, that something was missing because they could not see how these negotiations were going to reduce the number of warheads that each of the US and the USSR had in their arsenals. And Kissinger kept reminding them that in the “current” arms race, you first negotiate a halt to the race and then reverse it.

But there is a difference between what was happening then and what was said about it – and what is happening now and what is said about it. It is that politics used to stop at the water's edge in those days; it does not now. Worse, everything is now spun as if captured by the centrifuges of the Jewish propaganda machine. Look at the following “damned if you do and damned if you don't” approach used by the followers of that machine, and you'll understand why America is so paralyzed: “The framework is only an understanding … but Mr. Obama wanted to announce some agreement … lest Congress ratchet up sanctions on Iran.” The fault is not that of Obama; it is that of a system which used to work well till the Jews dragged it into their cesspool of uselessness.

After mentioning a few things they like in the deal, the editors of the Journal pull from their sleeve the Jewish joker whose jokes are too deadly to be funny. It is this: “All this would be somewhat reassuring if the U.S. were negotiating a nuclear deal with Holland or Costa Rica – that is, a law-abiding state with no history of cheating on nuclear agreements. But that's not Iran.” Look who's talking. This is the same U.S. which is twisting arms day in and day out, and kicking in the teeth the nations that dare to demand that Israel be made to abide by the laws which everyone else is asked to obey or forced to obey.

To buttress their argument, the editors make it sound like Iran has violated a provision of the Additional Protocol that was added to the Non-Proliferation Treaty in1997 when in fact, no such provision ever existed. Moreover, the same characters are now moaning that Iran has promised to sign the Protocol again … with the “anywhere, anytime” provision still not included in it. And they blame Iran for that? The truth is that – like the Hollands and the Costa Ricas of their dream – Iran did not cheat on any agreement, but the editors of the Wall Street Journal committed an unforgivable act of intellectual dishonesty.

And now, they pull the joker from their sleeve again: “Another giant asterisk concerns the lifting of sanctions.” They express this concern because, they say, there are loopholes of the kind that allowed North Korea to field nuclear weapons after reaching its deals with the U.N. and the U.S. And they do something that is very Jewish; they slap guilt on Iran by association: “Iran is probably North Korea's best friend.” So what, when neither is twisting arms on behalf of the other the way that America twists arms on behalf of blood-thirsty Israel?

Speaking of themselves and those like them, the editors do another thing that is Jewish. They predict what will happen in the Middle East if Mr. Obama does not listen to them. They call it a “horrific war a decade from now.” This will happen, they say, because “contrary to the President, the critics of his Iran framework do not want war.”

Coming from those caught practicing intellectual dishonesty, this is enough to gall you for the day. Still they end with this: “That's why this agreement needs a thorough vetting and genuine debate.” The trouble is, they don't know that a genuine debate rests on the intellectual honesty the Jews robbed them of.

And that's the asterisk that counts the most.

The true Face of an evil Ideology

Finally, a Jew who also happens to be a big wig in the Israeli hierarchy was rattled so badly by the events that have unfolded lately; he came right out and spilled his unfiltered guts. When this happened, the smooth double talk by which the Jews in Israel and elsewhere were able to lull the world and maintain it in the complacency mode, melted way and exposed the true face of evil for what it is.

Up to now the Jews could make the world ignore the crimes against humanity that were committed by the occupation of Palestine – but no more thanks to Daniel Doron who spilled his guts. He also highlighted the harshness with which the Jews have been treating the Palestinians, and the savagery with which they intend to hang on to the occupation. This is the naked look of the Jewish ideology they want the world to believe is a religion ... it has been revealed by one of its adherents.

Daniel Doron wrote: “A Palestinian State: Why Not?” and had it published on April 1, 2015 in the Weekly Standard. He begins by mentioning what Netanyahu had said about the establishment of a Palestinian state, and then sets out to justify it because: “the declaration was greeted with alarm among the commentariat.” He goes on to protest that the establishment of a Palestinian state leading to peace “has become an article of faith immune to fact or reason.”

What cons the Jews into believing that their ideology is a religion, is that the ideology stands on the conviction they can see the future and predict what will happen if they relent on doing what they are doing … which is what the world sees as evil. Thus, after unleashing the customary Jewish diatribe against the Palestinian Authority – which is the enemy he chose for the day – Doron predicts that if granted statehood, Palestine “will be taken over by Hamas [that] would promptly launch massive missile attacks against the heart of Israel.”

The Jewish author does not stop here with predictions he now presents as facts. Well, these would be facts from the future that only the Jews claim to have the gift of knowing. Thus, he reports from the future that: thousands could be killed; Israel's civil infrastructure would suffer; Israel will conquer the West Bank causing thousands of Arab and Jewish casualties; the remaining Arabs would flee to Jordan where they will destabilize the monarchy; Hamas will establish a state dominated by Iran.

And here is a “Jewish beauty.” To justify that the Jews have a moral claim to Palestinian land, the Jews must first convince the world that anyone, anywhere in the world who converts to Judaism has the right to take the place of a Palestinian family that lived in Palestine since the beginning of time. How do they do that? Doron shows us how. He asks the question: “As for moral claim to Palestinian land?” And he answers: There is none.

To explain all that, he does more than mutilate history, he snatches a history that is neither from the past of this Planet nor its future ... it must be from a parallel universe. Look at the following passage and wonder why this guy is not locked up in some institution: “When the Arabs received 93% of the vast Ottoman Empire, their representative, the Emir Faisal, willingly relinquished any claim to the territory that became a British mandate designated to establish a Jewish national home. He welcomed the Jews back to their fatherland.” The Arab representative gave us Palestine, says this Jewish author, thus welcoming the Jewish rape of Palestine. 

And that territory, my friend, includes the West Bank that Israel is said to occupy. No, says Doron “about the monstrous occupation that the White House said must end. There isn't one … any occupation is only by members of the Palestinian Liberation Organization who were brought to the West Bank from Tunisia.” And this, in a nutshell, is the kind of logic that my Jewish friend in Montreal once said gives every Jew a one-way ticket to the gas chamber. Doron says that the West Bank is not occupied by the Jews of the Israeli army; it is occupied by the Palestinian government in exile that was bombed by Israel in Lebanon and sought refuge in Tunisia.

He now admits that the first generation of Palestinians living under occupation from 1967 to 1987 reflected the tame character that the Arabs are famous for. It was during the second generation and beyond it that young Palestinians, growing under Jewish rule, began to fight fire with fire. He longs for the old days, and blames their disappearance not on the Jewish occupation of Palestine but the Palestinian occupation of Palestine.

If my Jewish friend from Montreal were still with us, he would throw his hands up in the air and cry out: Light up the oven.

The Ointment became Flesh-eating Disease

Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Ron Prosor, wrote an article to describe Israel as the victim that deserves sympathy and understanding. He called the article: “The U.N.'s War on Israel” and had it published in the New York Times on April 1, 2015.

In arguing his case, however, Prosor relied very much on his Jewish mentality, thus managed only to tell the world that Israel has never been the ointment that was meant to soothe the wounds of the Jews sustained after the last Holocaust, but turned out to be the flesh-eating disease that is now eating the Middle East on its way to eating the whole world.

Instead of turning the enclave in Palestine that the UN had designated as “Jewish homeland” into a place where the Jews could live in peace and quiet the way they said they would, these people turned the place into a Jewish al-Qaeda, and called it Israel. They made of it the laboratory where the tricks that sent the Jews to their pogroms and holocausts for centuries, were gathered and concocted into a disease that has been undermining international security for nearly seven decades.

Modeled after its defunct sisters, (the former Rhodesia and apartheid South Africa) Israel stands today as the only colonial and apartheid state to plague the planet. Unlike the sisters that were not Jewish, however, Israel has relied on its Jewish mentality to turn itself into the flesh-eating disease that the human race has come to dread more than any calamity since the beginning of time.

In his article, Prosor uses the two tricks that have come to be recognized as the signature of a Jewish mentality which is at work and up to something. All along, this signature has served to trigger the alarm among the people of the world … and it is happening now. One trick consists of whitewashing Israel by calling it a name that describes the opposite of what it is. Thus, the Jews are calling colonial and apartheid Israel not by that name, but calling it a democracy.

The second trick consists of attacking those who do not succumb to Jewish trickery, bribes or blackmail but refuse to go along and play the game that World Jewry continuously sets up anywhere and everywhere to trap the weak in character and recruit them to serve it. Since most of the nations and their leaders have moved away from this category, you see Ron Prosor attack the UN itself, being a representative of the world.

And this explains why the Israeli ambassador to the UN begins the article by lamenting that in terms of percentages, there are less democratic states in the world today than there was when the UN was founded seven decades ago. He includes colonial and apartheid Israel in the democratic club while leveling not a single criticism against it. And he tosses into the club of the undemocratic, the nations that the Jews have labeled as enemies of Israel for the day.

And while you have nearly two hundred member states of different races and religious affiliations, each standing at a different level of development, trying both to understand the others and make itself understood, you have the Jewish delegation of Israel telling everybody how they should make themselves useful to the Jewish and Israeli causes the way that America has turned itself into a useful idiot sacrificing the lives and limbs of its children to inflate the glory of Israel.

Yes, everyone in this cauldron of humanity has his faults, and so does Israel. However, the difference between them all on one side and Israel on the other; is that they all recognize they have a long way to go before they can become the model nations they aspire to be, whereas the Jews believe they are already the ultimate form of perfection that must never be asked to change.

But given that Israel is the worst thing that came to plague the planet … and rather than remain self-contained, seeks to eat the world like flesh-eating disease, the UN that has created it is trying to mitigate its deadly effects. Instead of cooperating with it, and integrate into the body of humanity, however, the Jews are viewing the effort as being: the U.N.'s War on Israel.

These people are hopeless, and will remain miserable to the end of time.