Given that today is the future of five decades ago, we may
consider the time in which we now live as posterity to historical events upon
which we have the right to pass judgment. What started to happen then was that
a handful of rabbis set out to “educate” the public as to the sensitivities of
the Jews. The result of the process has been the creation of a politically
correct language that people were obliged to master before they could address
the Jewish subjects or anything related to them.
To be educated is to learn the rules. When it came to
subjects that pertain to Jewish sensitivities, the rules have been infinite in
number, ambiguous in meaning, absolute when necessary and relative when
convenient. They are at the same time as dogmatic and trivial as having to list
in the first instance what is Jewish, followed by whatever else. For example,
the politically correct way to speak is to say Israel
and Palestine .
If you make the mistake of saying Palestine and Israel , you are
as good as dead professionally, financially and socially. You go on a blacklist
and find yourself tripped every step of the way without ever seeing who is
tripping you.
That example would be the simplest of dogmas you need to
learn if you want to function productively in an English speaking environment.
A more complex dogma would be the ability to turn reality upside-down. That is,
when you wake up in the morning, you check to see who is “our” friend today,
and who will be the enemy for the day. You then look in the mirror, identify
every ugliness in yourself and attribute it to the enemy. You follow that by
looking at the enemy to identify everything attractive about him or her. This
done, you attribute the beauty to yourself and your friend of the day.
By the time you internalize enough of these lessons to feel
their grip at the visceral level; you would have become canalized in the
direction of the rabbinical scheme of things. Ready to serve as feeder to the
stream that promises to absorb you into the body of the chosen, you will be
recognized as an honorary member of the Fox News television channel if not a
contributor or even a full-fledged recruit. That is the place, the ultimate
haven where up is down; down is up; right is left; left is right; front is
back, back is front; good is bad and bad is good.
And this is where Victor Davis Hanson now stands as you can
see by his latest article. Published on April 30, 2013 in National Review
Online, it has the title: “The Obama Borg” and the subtitle: “How 'man-caused
disasters' replaced Islamist terrorism in the Obama lexicon.” To explain the
meaning of the title, the author begins the article with this: “In Star Trek
lore, the Borg was a collective of servile drone operatives that sought to assimilate
other species into its 'hive mind'”
Right after that, he speaks of “groupthink” which he says is
a phenomenon that came about with the Obama Administration. But the fact is
that the word was first coined by the commission that investigated the tragedy
of September 11, 2001. It said Groupthink was a state of mind that existed
before the tragedy; one that paved the way for it to happen. Knowing how the
rabbis were educating the public in the decades that preceded the tragedy, and
reading the commission's report with a critical eye, you could not fail but
conclude that America slept in the bed made for it by the rabbis.
This done, Hanson goes on to speak about a bunch of
freelance kids from the back-alleys of Arab and Muslim towns as if they were a
Jewish style, organized group out to dominate the world. His mission which
connects with the groupthink of Fox News is to use the words of the language in
such a way as to imply that the act of one Arab or one Muslim kid would be the
act of 300 million Arabs – many of whom are Christians – and the act of a
billion Muslims around the world. Their mission would be to create a climate of
distrust between the audience they reach and the Muslim world they hate to
start a war between the two. It would be the war they hope will culminate in
the Armageddon that has been the Jewish dream since the beginning.
Desperate to achieve a goal that is by definition
unachievable, Victor Hanson does what Fox News has been doing for a long while
now. He fantasizes about a victory that he does not call a wish but describes
with words meant to deceive the reader about his motivation. This is how he put
it: “Tragically, it may take another Boston-style bombing to send enough rogue
voltage through the system to explode the circuitry and free the drones from
the hive.”
No, he does not believe this would be tragic; he believes it would be
“victory at last!” Someone should put this man under surveillance because he is
liable to commit something horrible to frame someone innocent.