The mutilators of history are out in force again
re-mutilating the carcass they have shaped and reshaped so many times in the
past to suit the changing circumstances. You can tell what the new
circumstances are for which they seek to re-reshape – for the umpteenth time –
what they have made of history, by reading the article that was written by
Clifford D. May under the title: “Iran's Rulers and the Art of the Deal” and
the subtitle: “With victories like these, who needs defeats?” It was published
on October 3, 2013 in National Review Online.
You will see they are not happy that President Obama is
“war-weary” because they would have wanted him to be eternally prepared to send
American boys and girls to fight the Jewish fight everywhere they order the
commander-in-chief of the U.S.
military to do so. After going through the long recital of lamentations about
America's inability to understand how bad the Iranians are, Clifford May tells
you what he wants from America: “A credible threat of military force might
weigh on the minds of Iranian rulers – though it's possible they have concluded
that Americans are far too war-weary to actually use that big stick.”
This being the case, they have re-tabled the old game of waving
the flag of Jewish moral clarity to play once again the card of Israel 's
nuclear ambiguity. You could tell they were about to pull this card from the
sleeve when Netanyahu said in a recent speech to the UN General Assembly that
Israel may go it alone. It is now understood that this threat is directed at
the Americans to signal that Israel
will commit a suicidal act so as to force America to come to the rescue or be
accused of allowing another Holocaust to happen.
In fact, the Judeo-Israeli gang has learned to use that
threat as a stone to kill two birds. The first bird – as described a moment ago
– is to put the Americans on notice. The second bird is to do what the gang
wished the Americans had done but failed to do. This would have been to make a
credible threat to use military force against Iran . In the absence of this
American threat, and the absence of a credible Israeli threat based on
conventional weapons, the gang came up with the idea of a nuclear ambiguity
which the Israelis have been playing since their defeat in 1973, and the rescue
that was mounted by America .
Shortly after that war came the incident known as the
“Vanunu Affair.” For a time it was thought that Vanunu was an Israeli nuclear
technician who escaped to Europe where he alerted the world that Israel was
producing nuclear weapons. Knowing how much preparation is needed, and how much
time it takes to make the nuclear core of a bomb, people who know this business
dismissed as a hoax the whole idea of Israel having a nuclear arsenal. As
to Vanunu, many now believe he was nothing more than an agent of their spy
agency.
The most that Israel could have done, said the people who
know this business, was to rely on the refined uranium its agents were able to
steal from France and from the United States to perhaps make one bomb which
they would still have to test – something they never did. It would have been
lunacy to try and test it in the middle of a war on a country they knew had the
capacity to annihilate them, and was at their doorstep.
That is why rumors began to circulate; put out by the Jewish
mouthpieces to the effect that the Israelis threatened President Nixon they
will poison the waters of the Nile with the dirty bomb they possessed if America did not
come to the rescue from a Holocaust that was certain to happen. They made the
threat of scattering radioactive material (dirty bomb) in the Nile even though
President Sadat of Egypt had
assured the Americans he will not go into Israel proper because all he wanted
was to retake the Sinai.
But when the idea that the Israelis threatened the Americans
they once considered poisoning the Nile with stolen radio active material – did
not sit well with the Egyptians or anyone else in the world – the Judeo-Israeli
propaganda machine dropped the mention of Egypt entirely from this version of
history as it continued to play the card of nuclear ambiguity.
The Jews have now restarted that game in order to threaten Iran . However,
these being different times and different circumstances, they find themselves
compelled to re-mutilate the already mutilated carcass of history they have so
often desecrated.
You can read all about it in two articles appearing on the
same day, October 4, 2013. One was written by Avner Cohen and published in the
New York Times under the title: “When Israel Stepped Back From the
Brink.” The other was published in the Wall Street Journal under the title: “A
lesson From the Yom Kippur War for a perilous time” and the subtitle: “Golda
Meir didn't strike pre-emptively in 1973 because she was 'scared' of angering
the White House.”
Read and be bored
but don't blame me for telling you about them since you can refrain from
reading the rubbish if you so decide.