For centuries the Christians of Europe have understood that
the Jewish leaders benefited from pitting people against each other, thus
sparking the conflicts and the wars that made them wealthy and powerful. To
escape detection in America
– once they had decided to turn to it looking for new feeding grounds – those
Jewish leaders made it a priority to outlaw the observation that Jews were
responsible for starting this war or that one.
But because the First Amendment of the Constitution forbade
them from legislating the notion into an actual law, they did the next best
thing which was to call an act of antisemitism, the making of that observation
in public. This being a defamation, a libel or a slander, they threatened people
left and right with lawsuits, thus shut them up effectively – an exercise known
as the chill effect and self-censorship.
This done, the Jewish leaders pulled another gimmick from
their bottomless hat of tricks; to whisper hateful messages in the ears of the
American legislators and executives, thus turning them against the enemy they
chose for the day. After a period of time during which they set Christian
against Christian, Protestant against Catholic an do so – the way the used to
do things in Europe – they got another idea which they hoped will support their
effort to outlaw Christmas and the Christmas tree with the view of replacing
them with Chanukah, the Menorah and the Festival of Light.
While this was going on, the Jews remained true to their nature;
that of working on several levels at the same time. Thus, while they had
declared war on Christianity in America
– pitting one Christian denomination against the other, and all against Jesus
and his Nativity – they had in the pipeline other projects that would pit the
Christians of America against two other groups that happened to live outside of
America .
They were the godless Communists and the Muslims.
The fall of the Berlin Wall took care of the Communists, and
this left the Muslims standing alone in the Jewish line of sight. This prompted
their leaders to come up with the idea of toning down the attacks on Jesus and
the Christmas tree while promoting the idea that we all live by the values of
the Judeo-Christian culture which is different from and superior to the other
cultures, especially the Muslim one. Working in stealth, they started to put
the blocs together which they hoped will fuse the idea of the Crusaders wars on
Islam with the reorganization of the Middle East
in the style of the Sykes-Picot Agreement.
To implement this plan required them to have effective
control of the American military by infiltrating it at all levels, something
they knew they could not do given their small number, and given the
single-minded dedication to the American homeland they will be required to
adopt but could not because of the divided loyalties that made them who they
are. And so they came up with the idea of expanding on the notion of civilian
control of the military. They gave Dick Cheney the powers of the presidency,
filled his office with “children of Holocaust survivors,” gave them the power
to dismiss off-hand the recommendations of the Chiefs of Staff, ordered the
production of new weapon systems such as the infamous “Crusader” and prepared a
war plan that will begin with the destruction of Iraq.
The war on Islam could not be kept hidden anymore, least of
all from the eyes of the Muslims who knew they could not take on the American
military, let alone the NATO alliance that was under American control, therefore
Jewish control. But the bombing by cruise missile of a baby food factory in
Sudan, and the failed bombing of the hotel where a Muslim conference was held
in Baghdad, convinced such people as Bin Ladden and his young followers (whom
the Americans recruited to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan and later double
crossed) that the time had come to do to America what America had trained them
to do to the Soviets in Afghanistan. If the Arab armies cannot stop Jewish
America, they said, we'll try. And so they did on 9/11 of the year 2001.
This gave the Jews the excuse they needed to come out in the
open and announce the start of the war on terror which they meant to be a war
on Islam. Now more than twelve years later, the American people have had it up
to here seeing their superpower motherland being pulled into the Jewish sewer
of hate, blood, horror, death and national bankruptcy. They want out despite
the Jewish cries of war, war, war.
As the American voices got louder while the Jewish voices
got fainter, the leaders of the Jews employed new approaches to keep the
appetite for war alive. The latest being the idea that a war on Christians is
ongoing; conducted not by the Christmas hating Jews, but by the Muslims for a
reason that the Jews cannot explain.
This being the case, they had to find new and creative
tricks to be effective at stirring the hatred of the American people whom they
abused so badly, they could no longer move with anything traditional they say
to them. You can see this in the National Review Online interview published on
October 30, 2013. It has the title “Exposing 'The Global War Against
Christians'” and the subtitle: “Considering anti-Christian persecution in the
21st century.” The interviewer is Kathryn Jean Lopez, and the interviewee is
John L. Allen Jr., who is correspondent for the National Catholic reporter.
Lopez introduces the presentation by quoting something that
Pope Benedict XVI wrote on the occasion of World Day of Peace. He said: “Many
Christians experience daily affronts … because of their pursuit of truth, their
faith in Jesus, and their plea for religious freedom.” To me, this sounds like
he was telling the Jews to get their hands off the Christmas tree and the
Nativity scenes. But that's not what Lopez wants us to believe, and so she
tries to mislead the readers by employing a dirty trick that is very much in
the Jewish style, and never in the Christian style. What she did was quote the
Pope as saying another thing after which she wrote “he continued,” and right
after that wrote down what John Allen had said. And that was something that had
nothing to do with what the pope was saying. Thus, Lopez who is a Catholic, put
the words of Allen into the mouth of the Pope, and this is a sacrilegious act
for which she should be excommunicated.
And so it goes with the rest of the interview, paid for and
sustained by the likes of National Review Online, once a respected publication
but now a doormat for the Jewish boots that forever seek new opportunities to
march on someone else's ground.