Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Asian Cabal corrupting American Democracy

John R. Bolton is a Jewish lawyer, which makes him an automatic citizen of Israel, a so-called “nation” situated in Western Asia. The fact that he was born in America and continues to live in it is a convenience that serves the purpose of working from within to promote the interests of Israel at the expense of America. Also, John Yoo is an American educated lawyer who was born in the Eastern Asian nation of South Korea. He has lived in his adopted country since he was a small child, was educated there, and now practices law within its jurisdiction.

By random chance or by some other phenomenon, we find that the two Asian lawyers have wrapped themselves in the American flag, and have authored a joint article that can only be considered the ultimate insider's job in sabotaging the interests of the host country to promote those of outside jurisdictions – in this case, Israel in the Western part of Asia, and the “democratic” states in the Eastern part of Asia … such as South Korea, Taiwan, Japan and other nascent democracies in the region.

Bolton and Yoo co-authored: “Advice on 'Advice and Consent,'” and had it published in National Review Online on December 29, 2014. What they do in this piece is deliver the second punch in the debating technique known as the one-two punch. This is a trick that consists of delivering what amounts to a blow in the face of the audience so as to divert its attention while preparing to deliver the more powerful and more substantive second blow … in fact, the several second blows that follow.

The diversionary blow came years ago when the Jewish propaganda machine propagated the notion that Arab kids from the back-alleys of some rundown Third World cities had mastered the intricacies of the American judicial system, and had been exploiting it to their advantage. The proof the Jewish machine tabled was to simply state that the Arab kids were telling each other not to give information to interrogators when caught doing something that displeases America. And this was enough to inflame the passions of American commentators and legislators who saw enough red to be blinded to the fact that the Jews were delivering a slew of second blows to the American legislative and judicial systems.

To do this, the cabal of multi-faceted Jewish organizations has infiltrated the two chambers of the U.S. Congress and has used the existing parliamentary tricks as well as those it added to the system, to promote the interests of Israel and World Jewry by paralyzing the business of America. Those organizations also infiltrated every so-called think-tank in the nation, and every judicial and quasi-judicial body where they turned upside down the principles that made America the unique cultural phenomenon it used to be … but is no more.

And now, you see the Jewish machine recruit the likes of John Yoo, and have him add his two-cent worth of blabber to promote what is incontestably recognized as being the eternal passion of the Jews: war, war, war … running blood, mutilated flesh and broken bones. You see them argue for all that – as in their latest article – by making the legislative part of America declare war on the executive part in an effort to force the latter to mobilize the nation for a war against humanity that will last for ever and ever.

But what is it that gives the Jewish argument the force it seems to have when falling on the ears of America's legislators and media types? The best way to answer this question is to pick an example and discuss it. Because Bolton and Yoo could not find something in the Constitution that would compel the American President to launch a war against a nation that did not hurt America, the two authors engage in the infamy known as intellectual masturbation of the most Jewish kind. And this is how they do it:

First, they advise: “Checking Obama should be a top priority for the Republicans in Congress.” Second, they speculate: “Obama desperately wants a deal with Iran.” Third, they warn: “the administration has pledged not to use military force against Iran.” Fourth, they suggest that: “Republicans and Democrats should agree that renunciation of the use of military force limits U.S. sovereignty.” Fifth, they opine that this: “violates Article II of the Constitution.” What? Say it again. How do they make this out?

Masturbation, my dear Watson, it is Jewish masturbation. The way they do it is not to assert in a clear and honest manner that Obama has violated Article II of the Constitution, but that he “may well have violated the Article.” And why is that? Because the Article says that the president “shall have power to make treaties.” Okay, he has that power and he did not exercise it; what's wrong with that? No, no, no, they say, you don't understand. He has the power but only if two-thirds of the Senate approve.

Approve, they say? Approve of what? And they answer (get this now, my friend) approve that he will not unleash a war against a sovereign country that did not hurt America. Wow … Wow … Wow the power of Jewish masturbation. But does that apply to the other two hundred jurisdictions on the planet? No. It only applies to Iran, they say, because for now, only Iran is hated by the Jews.

And while John and John are masturbating, the universe is unfolding as it should, says Desiderata.