Under the title: “Iran 's not-so-hidden hidden
agenda,” Michael Rubin wrote an article that was published on November 27, 2014
in the Dallas News. He ends the article with these words: “now is not the time
to allow Iran
to … march toward the most destructive weapons known to mankind.” He means the
nuclear bomb which is admittedly a destructive weapon but is nowhere near being
as destructive as the Jewish ideology.
This is the ideology that spawned a culture pretending to be
a religion, and a philosophy of life pretending to be humanistic. It is in
reality a culture of destruction, and a philosophy of death. It has already
cost mankind millions if not billions of lives since the beginning of time. The
way it operates is indicated by none other than the current Michael Rubin
article; by most of the articles he wrote in the past, and by the thousands
upon thousands of articles that were written over time by others like him … all
advocating and glorifying war, war, war.
If war is defined as a clash between two armies that were
prepared for it, the Jews never fought such a war. They always incited someone
else to fight it for them. But if war means to be given the most advanced
weapons of the epoch, and use them to slaughter disarmed men, women and
children … sneaking on them in the middle of the night and showering them with
bombs from hundreds of feet up in the sky – then it must be said that the Jews
are veterans of such cowardly wars, and champions of the bloodbaths that
result.
To get someone to fight for them the wars they cannot fight,
and to get someone to give them the weapons they cannot make, the Jews have
mastered an approach that is unique to them. It consists of slandering a
would-be enemy, of making false predictions about him and of speculating as to
his motives while stressing that he is more than the enemy of the Jews; he is
the enemy of mankind, including those whom the Jews are inciting to get
mobilized and get prepared to fight against.
Thus, you see Michael Rubin begin the article by asserting
without offering a shred of evidence that for Iranian officials, the failure to
reach a final agreement “is going according to plan.” And this is because the
Iranians harbor bad motives, he says, in that they want to relieve the pressure
imposed on their economy. What a crime! The Iranians want to relieve the
pressure on their economy; can you believe it? This is as bad as pointing out
that Obama wants to feed the children of America
before fighting useless wars of the kind that America always loses. What a
scandal! Impeach, impeach.
Since it is not enough to speak of the Iranians in the
abstract, Michael Rubin assigns the role of villain to Hassan Rouhani, the
current President of Iran. He says that: “his efforts are window-dressing,
meant to distract attention from Tehran 's
true aims,” however evil those aims may be. Still, having made the assertion,
the author attributes the evil to the entire Iranian leadership. To buttress
this argument, he does two typically Jewish things. First, he pretends to know
what “the Iranian leadership says in Persian to their public.” And second, he
says that the intonation “Death to America ” (which is sometimes heard
when Iranians gather to denounce an American belligerent action against them)
“is not mere rhetoric.” He does not explain that “death to something” in
Persian is the equivalent of “down with something,” which is often intoned in
English.
Poor Michael Rubin. Realizing that there is not enough here
to incite America to go after
Iran ,
he makes a big gamble. He says that Rouhani publicly “outlined a doctrine of
surprise in which Iran would
lull the United States
into complacency, before delivering a knockout blow.” And that's not all
because the man later bragged that “he merely used diplomacy to trick the West
all the while furthering Iran 's
nuclear program.” In short, Rubin says that Rouhani telegraphed what he was
going to do, he went ahead and did it, and little Rubin caught it but the
entire West missed it. This is self-delusion that is so bizarre; it does not
work even in fiction.
Finally, Rubin comes down to the real purpose of his
article. He is worried about the future of Israel ,
he says, because Iran
threatens its existence. He then does something that tells the readers they
must not believe a word he says. Look at the following and marvel at the
mentality of this man: “Iran 's
quest to arm itself with long-range missiles leaves America 's Arab allies jittery.”
Oh what an idiot! This guy never looked at the map of the Middle East . If he did, he would have seen that the Arabs
are Iran 's
closest neighbors. If Iran
wanted to attack them, it would not develop long-range missiles. In fact, the
only ones jittery in the Middle East are the Israeli leaders because they know
that if and when Iran
will be equipped with a long retaliatory arm, they will have to think twice
before falling into the Jewish habit of barking threatening insults at that
country.
Ignorant of all that, and believing that he made his point
as powerfully as it can be made; Rubin now wants to add icing on the cake. And
so, he loftily declares: “Furthermore, we cannot ignore that Iran remains
the world's premier state sponsor of terrorism.” He may or may not believe
this, but he must be aware that the world knows Israel
to be the only terrorist state on this planet, and that America remains
its main sponsor.
And what would be a Michael Rubin article without a comical
relief at the end? And so, the author puts a smile on the face of his readers
by speaking of an Iran that
has everyone knocking at its door seeking to do business with it – as if it
were the miserable little thing they call Israel . That's the thing which is
often seen on its knees begging America
to battle an international community that's boycotting it and refusing to accord
it any legitimacy. Look how Rubin turned that reality on its head: “If Iran can derive
international legitimacy by talking, why make compromises?” The fact is that Iran does not lack legitimacy; Israel does.
And the author does not stop here. He goes on to say: “the
time is ripe for toughening the sanctions until Iran complies with the
international community.” The trouble is, he doesn't say if he means the
international community of this planet or that of another planet or maybe the
planet of his imagination.