There are Orthodox Jews and there are those who call
themselves Reform Jews. Yes, the Jews do need to change if they don't want to
continue being the eternal losers they have always been. But what is needed is not
the kind of change that the reformers have been devising up to now. In fact, it
can even be said that the newest of the reformers have changed things not for
the better but for the worse.
The reality is that the change which these people brought to
the Jews of North America is nothing more than the latest tweaking of a
religion that has changed its shape to suit the local conditions whenever it
moved; to whatever place it moved. In fact, all religions do this sort of thing
to attract new converts, and Judaism has not been different in this sense. But
what the Jews carry with them everywhere they go – that is different from the
other religions – is that they seek new converts not to grow a religion but
grow an ideology.
Long before there were political parties as we know them
today, let alone parties with an international outlook, the Jews had organized
themselves into a kind of political party that has at its core an outlook which
is both local and international. What makes the Jews more political than religious
is that they think of human beings not as lambs in need of a shepherd to gather
them and take them to a safe place, but think of them as evil opponents that
must be conquered and subjugated … or risk being annihilated at their hands.
This is why there is never a true relationship between a Jew
and a non-Jew based on equality. You see this reality on the international
stage where you have Jewish masters commanding their American, Canadian and
Australian possessions, or you see Jews forever conspiring to mobilize their
possessions, and get them ready to go after their opponents … most everyone
else in the world. However, you may at times see what appears to be a
relationship of equals between a Jew and a non-Jew. Do not be fooled. You must
realize that this is an optical illusion because the truth can only be that the
Jew is in the process of drafting the non-Jew into the ideology of political
Judaism. He is all smiles now; he'll be cracking the whip sooner or later.
You can see evidence of all this in two articles published
at about the same time near the end of November, 2014. The first was written by
Reuel Marc Gerecht under the title: “Extending Extensions” and the subtitle:
“The 'complex' negotiations with Iran.” It was posted on the website of the
Weekly Standard, and published in the print edition of the magazine. The second
was written by Josh Gelernter under the title: “Obama & Genocide” and the subtitle:
“He spoke blandly of Tibet's 'unique identity,' but said nothing about Falun
Gong.” It was published in National Review Online.
Both articles do the very Jewish thing of trying to gain
credit for their side by discrediting the other side. For example, Gerecht
disparages Iran and chides the Obama administration for not doing what needs to
be done to confront the Iranians whom he considers to be evil. Why evil? It is
because in his imagination, Iran represents an existential threat to Israel. A
threat to Israel? If so, where is the evidence to this effect when, in fact, it
was America's ally, Iraq that attacked Iran without provocation in previous
years; and it is America's ally Israel that constantly threatens to attack Iran
today?
There is no evidence that would hold in a respected court of
law, or hold in a kangaroo court or hold in the court of public opinion. All
that Reuel Marc Gerecht is offering in his article is speculation, delusions,
self-deception and outright lies. But that's what political Judaism is all
about. If these people wish to change their miserable destiny, they will have to
change not their cosmetic religiosity but their fundamental ideology.
As to Josh Gelernter, he attacks and disparages China, and
also chides President Obama for not doing what needs to be done to confront
China on the subject of Tibet, and what flows from that in terms of violations
to human rights. Because this is a subject with which you're not familiar, you
do two things. One, you look for real evidence – not speculation or hearsay – in
the article as to the accusations that are leveled against China, and two, you
compare what you find, with the hard evidence that comes out of Israel and the
occupied land of Palestine on a regular basis; almost on a daily basis.