Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Wanted: a Freud to explain a Friedman

Let me try this on you. I spent two years in a mining town in Northwestern Ontario where I did some journalism, and where I learned a great deal about the culture of both the locals and the transients such as I was myself. And this is why I can report the following to you with utmost confidence:

“When trying to make sense of mining towns, one of the most important rules to keep in mind is this: What the locals tell you in private is usually irrelevant. What matters most, and what explains their behavior more times than not, is what they say in public in their own idioms to their own town-folks.” Get it?

So let me reveal the big secret of those places. Both the locals and the transients drink water but they also enjoy consuming tea, coffee, soda, juices and alcoholic beverages. They breathe air because if the don't they suffocate. They eat meat as well as fruits and vegetables. They wear clothes during the day and change into more comfortable things at night. They make love, make babies and die when old. Now that you know the secrets of the mining towns, you have me to thank because only I could have reported this to you.

Of course, now that you have read this, you will let your fingers do the banging on your computer keyboard trying to locate a psychiatrist of the Sigmund Freud caliber to tell you about the screws that have gone loose in my head. And this is also what you would do if you read the Tom Friedman column that came under the title: “Freud and the Middle East” published on November 12, 2014 in the New York Times.

It is in that column that he wrote: “When trying to make sense of the Middle East, one of the most important rules to keep in mind is this: What politicians here tell you in private is usually irrelevant. What matters most, and what explains their behavior more times than not, is what they say in public in their own language to their own people,” which if you are a good observer, will realize it is what I reported above almost verbatim while describing the people in mining towns. Is it a coincidence? No. Is it plagiarism? No. It is a parody. I used Friedman's own words to show how absurd they sound when placed in a context that is familiar to the readers.

And this is not the first time that Tom Friedman has done so. In fact, if he believes he can tell a fictitious story in such away as to make the readers believe it is true; he'll do that and take credit. But if he has a real story that is no more sensational than describing someone who brags about the exploits of his country, Friedman will start with a preamble to try and tell the readers that he's divulging a big secret for which they should thank him given that he is taking them in his confidence.

So then, what does our author say about the Middle East, which he asserts are the secrets to understanding that place? Well, there are a few things. For example, there is an excerpt – posted on some obscure website – lifted from an interview conducted with an Iranian national that is boasting about the exploits of his country. There is also the fact that the Turks are commemorating one of their greats by naming a bridge after him, an act that does not please those whom the “great one” harmed. And there is the notion that every Sunni may be dreaming of an expanded Muslim nation in the way that every Jew may be dreaming of an expanded Jewish nation.

And these happen to be the elements that the Middle Eastern secret is made of. They were known, up to now, only to Tom Friedman, but thanks to his generosity, more people will be exposed to them.

Finally, Tom Friedman summarizes that “there are so many dreams and nightmares playing out in the Middle East that Freud would not have been able to keep them straight.” This leads him to a painful observation and a conclusion. The observation is to the effect that few if any in the Middle East dream of establishing what he calls a pluralistic democracy. As to the conclusion, it is to the effect that half a dozen places need to be protected from the ravages of ISIS.

But he is not hopeful that the effort will produce any result, he says, even if ISIS is defeated. In this case you ask: what was the point of the column? Well … a Freud may provide the answer. He may say that Tom Friedman is being Tom Friedman. He is repeating the message he has been peddling for years. It is this: Look what I can do and admire me even if it is useless to you.