If you define a chronic disease as being a condition that
manifests itself with recurring symptoms, and keeps you feeling sick whether or
not the symptoms have flared up, you must consider the Jewish influence on America to be a
chronic disease.
There is no place in America where you can go, and there is
no time when you can be, without encountering a Jew or a disciple thereof who
will not tell you that an Arab or a Muslim country must be bombed. He will
follow up with the accusation that America is derelict in its duty
because it is not bombing the country. Well, the time has come to admit that
Judaism is a disease that's taking its toll on America ; a nation that's crying out
for a cure.
An occurrence that just flared up came under the title:
“Return of the Red Line?” written by Jeryl Bier and published on January 13,
2017 in the Weekly Standard. To set the stage for justifying the lament that America is unwilling to bomb Syria even though it is so obligated;
Bier commits a massive intellectual fraud and builds on it.
He uses a discussion that took place between Secretary of
State John Kerry and journalist Judy Woodruff, as a stepping stone, to speak of
two different things as if they were one and the same thing. The two things are
two groups of chemicals, one of which is banned, the other not. The banned
group comprises napalm, sarin, anthrax, nerve gas, phosphoric compounds and the
like. The group that's not banned comprises all kinds of explosives, including
those which are based on chlorine.
Bier says that Syria used chlorine bombs during
the recent civil war, therefore must be bombed according to the “redline”
warning that President Obama issued some time ago. Instead of lamenting that
chlorine is not on the list of banned chemicals, he talks about it as if it
were. He does that by creating the kind of informational noise which distracts
the reader from the reality of the lie he is peddling.
Here is how he went about it. First, he quoted John Kerry
saying this: “President Obama never retreated from his redline … never changed
his mind that you don't use chemical weapons.” He then quoted a posting on the
State Department blog which says this: “an international panel concluded that Syria used
chlorine bombs...” He did so without explaining that President Obama spoke of
the banned group of chemical, whereas the State Department referred to the
unbanned group – two different things.
Of course, if Jeryl Bier and those like him were not the
intellectual frauds that they are, they would be talking about a Syria that
promised to give up its banned chemical weapons when asked to do so, and kept
its promise. And they would use this example as a stepping stone to speak about
an Israel
that's the only entity to have used two of the banned chemical weapons, napalm
and the phosphoric compounds, but has not yet been censured.
Despite the fact that Syria
did not use the banned chemicals unlike Israel
that did, Syria was held
accountable and continues to be censured by Europe
and by the American State Department as well as the White House. Here is what
Jeryl Bier says the State Department has stated:
“The U.S.
supports the UK and France to pursue accountability through the UNSC
resolution, imposing targeted sanctions on the individuals and entities in Syria … It is
crucial that all those responsible for the use of chemical weapons be held
accountable...”
He went on to say “the Treasury Department announced that
eighteen Syrian regime officials connected with Syria 's
weapons of mass destruction program would be targets of U.S.
sanctions”.
Despite all this, Jeryl Bier and others like him, asked why
the American “threatened military response was not triggered?” When they did
not get a response that would satisfy them, Bier went on to lament as follows:
“Just as with the State Department, however, the White House
was silent on the original 'red line' threat of military action.” And military
action is what he and his cohorts were hoping for.