Two articles in two New York
tabloids printed on two consecutive days tell the story of the Jewish
politico-diplomatic cowboy that's riding the American bull, and playing rodeo
in the china shop that is the Middle East .
First, on January 24, 2017 came: “The hard facts Team Trump
should face on the Middle East,” an article that was written by Ralph Peters
and published in the New York Post. Second, on January 25, 2017 came: “A Jerusalem embassy?
Liberals shouldn't worry,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “The
Western part of the city is part of Israel , anyway you cut it,” written
by Robert Abrams and published in the New York Daily News.
Abrams tells the story of how the idea of moving the
American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem
was hatched, being one of the fathers who contributed to its conception. The
beauty of this account is that it sheds light on how petty decisions by small
men can grow to become major calamities affecting millions of people. This
hasn't happened with the American example as yet, but it serves as a metaphor
that explains what might have happened when the Sykes-Picot Agreement was
hatched – and for which there is no detailed chronicle.
Here, in condensed form, is Abrams's account:
“The year was 1972, and George McGovern was the 500-to-1
long-shot liberal candidate. My friend Hilly Gross and I were asked to hammer
out elements for a McGovern Middle East program. We drafted that the United States should recognize Jerusalem
as the capital of Israel
and move its embassy there. Democrats adopted the following in the party's
platform: 'recognize the establishment of Jerusalem
as the capital of Israel .
The United States embassy
should be moved to Jerusalem .'
Soon thereafter, Republicans adopted it as well. In 1995, the Jerusalem Embassy
Act was passed and called for Jerusalem to
remain an undivided city and for it to be recognized as the capital of Israel ”.
This shows how useless the democratic system of governance
has become in the new age. You have a bunch of losers that hammered a fat idea
to serve Israel
in the hope of winning the White House for a period of 4 years or maybe 8. They
lost and the opposing party won, the way that things are done in America
periodically.
Meanwhile, the one thing that remained constant throughout
that time was the governing supra-structure of a Jewish establishment that
stayed with the Jewish idea from 1972 to 1995 to this day. The Jews played one
party against the other and continue to play them, thus making the idea a
permanently bipartisan favorite. All that, despite the fact the idea has the
potential to do to the world what Sykes-Picot did to it once already.
You can see in the Ralph Peters article how dire the
situation is in the part of the Middle East that's called the Levant .
And you can extrapolate what will happen to the entire region if the Jews are
allowed to rodeo-ride the American bull into the china shop that is the Middle East today. Peters gives his remedial prescription
for the region, beginning with a preamble that goes over several paragraphs,
and can be condensed as follows:
“We lost the upper Middle East .
It's time to cut our losses. It's a lost cause. We cling to fantasies of
success in Afghanistan , Iraq and Syria . We cannot break the hold of
Washington-think on foreign policy that benefits not the United States but our enemies … Here is how to
exploit the weaknesses of Iran ,
Russia and Turkey ”.
Peters lays out his views with regard to each of these
places. What he says has the sound of valid points from which to start a good
debate. He also mentions in passing a few other places in the Gulf Region and
North Africa, and then drops the name Israel
about which he says this: “Support Israel . Always”.
And that's where the link is established – in the mind of
the reader – between the Ralph Peters article and that of Robert Abrams. To
begin with, Peters is showing – with the use of the word 'always' – how the
principles crafted by the Jews for America
make permanent what favors Israel ,
and how they work to reverse what criticizes Israel . They place Israel above the law, and force America to
protect what kills the democratic system of governance.