Talk of cyber-spying and cyber-sabotaging is in the air. Two
aspects of the story are of special interest to me; the gathering of
information about someone with the view of ruining his or her life, and the
interference in the political system of a country with the view of
destabilizing the regime.
The first is a personal story that would take 20 or 30 books
to write. I avoided writing it for decades, and have no intention of doing it
now. What I'm going to do, however, is tell as little as possible of it to draw
a lesson or two that should be useful in the current debate. I do this because
I feel duty bound to expose the criminal and cowardly mindset that can easily
grip a nation if not a continent, and hold it captive for decades. It is an
addictive game that enslaves the predators who play it, their victims who
suffer horrendous pain, and the “beneficiaries” who feel entertained by it.
What happened to me was a secret police operation they
presented not as a decades-long act of state terrorism – which it was – but as
nothing more than a banal little game meant to entertain the elites who were
privileged enough to be in the loop. Because I was deemed to be as clean as a
whistle at the outset, the elites believed they will nonetheless benefit from
what they will be getting. They pretended to enjoy every piece of boring
information that the cowardly criminals were gathering about me and circulating
among them.
More to the point; when an entity wishes to watch a foreign
country for whatever reason, it sets up two kinds of surveillance operations by
which to gather information about its citizens. One is electronic spying; the
other is human spying. The Jewish Congress did not have to work hard on setting
up these two systems in Canada ;
it called on the Canadian secret police to work for it, and the latter said it
would be honored to do so. Thus, what the Jewish Congress ordered, the Canadian
secret police delivered – no questions asked.
In my case, the secret police had determined, as far back as
the Seventies, that I shall never do something to compromise me, and so they
set out to make life so difficult for me, they hoped I would suffer a mental
breakdown or commit a horrible act, thus justify their cowardly crime – that of
doing what a low life animal would not do to someone.
They gathered every bit of information about the places
where I worked, where I lived and where I went. They made a note of the people
with whom I spoke, what I said and what I did. And they circulated the
information among the people who wanted to hurt me because I refused to toe
their line, and spent a lifetime defying them.
As to the second story, it's about one country interfering
in the political system of another country with the view of destabilizing the
regime. Well, that's something I wrote about on several occasions on this
website. My beef has been that everyone thinks it's okay for America to go around the globe
under Jewish guidance, and change the regimes that refuse to toe the Jewish line.
Now that something similar has happened to America , with Russia
being the aggressor, my wish is that enough brain cells will be energized; they
will review the situation and will inform America 's leaders it is time to end
the practice of changing the regime of other nations. If this comes to pass,
the grief that resulted from what happened in places like Iraq and Libya
will be alleviated by the rejoicing that will follow America 's pledge never again to
interfere in the internal affairs of other nations – and certainly not when it
is urged by Jewish pundits.
What prompted me to go against my grain and reveal these
things, is an article that came under the title: “Lost in cyberspace” and the
subtitle: “Cyberespionage is a concern, but cyberwarfare is far more serious.”
It was written by Clifford D. May and published on January 10, 2017 in The
Washington Times. The passage I find disturbing pertains to the option that
Clifford May suggests Washington
should pursue. He put it this way:
“His team is likely to weigh two options. Alex Gibney argues
that treaties are the answer to cyberthreats. I'm not persuaded … The
alternative: Acknowledge that a cyber arms race must be run – and then win it”.
When it comes to traditional wars fought with firearms,
Clifford May ranks among the warmongers. He automatically assumes that his side
will win with minimum casualties or none at all. This is why he never mentions
the veterans who suffer so horribly for so long. To him, these combatants do
not exist.