Monday, January 23, 2017

Derangement Syndrome of America's Pundits

Once in a while Steven A. Cook writes an article which typifies what it is that troubles America's punditry. He shows the industry to be filled with people who may have started their careers with an open mind and a rounded view of the world that's surrounding them, but have become increasingly narrow minded and one dimensional.

Cook's latest foray in this vein came in the form of an article he wrote under the title: “Middle East derangement syndrome” and the subtitle: “Egypt, Turkey and Israel have all fallen prey to delusions about Trump.” It was published on January 22, 2017 on the website of Salon Magazine. This being a discussion on the situation in three countries, I only choose to discuss what is reported about Egypt. I do so in the interest of covering the subject comprehensively.

Steven Cook starts his article by saying that the Egyptians were so happy with the election result in America that their President “Sisi reportedly considered attending [Trump's] inauguration.” Well, it must be said that this was a false report. It could have originated in Washington where it was circulated as rumor, because no trace of that was detected in Egypt or anywhere else.

Here is a passage that points to the narrow mindedness of the American pundits: “It all seems strange given how Trump rode to power … appealing to isolationists. If there was any sign about Trump's approach to U.S. foreign policy, it was retrenchment … leaders in these countries seem to [fantasize] that Trump will be a [good] steward of their security...” But the reality is the opposite of that. Both the people and government in Egypt have always wanted all foreign influences, including the American, to stay out of the country – way out.

That is especially true when it comes to the toxic gifts of depravity they call Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) which are in reality creatures of the American Congress of horror. These things are considered to be time bombs designed to subvert the governments of other nations. Their mission is to infiltrate those that take them in and remodel their hosts in the image of America's legislative houses of political prostitution.

The ultimate goal of these roving horror shows is to paralyze the foreign governments they infiltrate, causing them not to act unless ordered by Jewish voices that seek to implement the Judeo-Israeli agenda. But Egypt is lucky in that it has nearly 50,000 home-grown civil societies looking after the needs of their people extremely well. The last thing they want is to be contaminated by Jewish-American political garbage.

Instead of seeing things in this light and discussing them for what they are, Steven Cook uses four paragraphs to make the narrative sound like Egypt desperately wants something from America. But after saying all that he desires to say, you find that the writer has only managed to demonstrate that Egypt wants the American monkey off its back, and nothing more. Here is how that goes:

In a paragraph that contains 93 words there appears this passage: “The Egyptians are convinced that the Trump administration will drop objections to Egypt's record on human rights.” The next paragraph contains 86 words, including this passage: “Even if Trump does what the leaders want, how will it make things better? The Egyptians seem likely to get what they want: a change in tone in relations with Washington.” The third paragraph contains 110 words just to say this: “better relations with Washington won't make the insurgency in the Sinai go away or make Egypt's economy suddenly grow.” The fourth paragraph contains 104 words, and makes this point: “the Egyptians are likely to confront the reality that the problem in their relationship with the United States has been in Cairo, not Washington.” What? What the bleep is he talking about?

Where in all that verbiage is there a hint that unresolved problems do exist between Cairo and Washington? The only thing that comes out with clarity from the 393 words which are spread out in four paragraphs is that the American human rights load of untreated and stinky rubbish has nauseated the people and government of Egypt to such an extent, they will have nothing to do with it ever again.

In addition, Steven Cook seems to promise that President Trump is inclined to put an end to the unmitigated Judeo-American depravity of inflicting on other nations what he knows is killing America. So the question to ask is this: what does Steven Cook mean when he characterizes these realities as “the problem has been in Cairo, not Washington”? Will he explain? Don't hold your breath.