Did you hear the often-repeated complaint that the
American so-called intelligence agencies never got it right when it came to
forming an intelligent understanding of what went on in the hot spots of the
world?
Whether or not you did, here is something that you'll
find interesting. It is the unintended revelation by a Jew who served at the
CIA and other such posts for 30 years, of how he screwed up the good work that
might have been done by other non-Jewish agents.
His name is Daniel N. Hoffman, and he made the
revelation in an article he wrote under the title: “Don't let Iran off the
economic hook during COVID-19 crisis,” and the subtitle: “Iran can't evade the
choice between military aggression and providing for its people,” published on
April 23, 2020 in The Washington Times.
Believing that you'll be treated with the insight of a
highly qualified individual endowed with the credentials that he does, you go
through Daniel Hoffman's article looking for the gift of knowledge that no one
else can give you. But all you encounter in the article is a repeat of the
Jewish talking points, as well as the long discredited stereotyping of Iran,
outright lies and a spin of realities so shameful, you are stunned by the
shallowness of a guy who spent 30 years learning on the job and came out as
ignorant as when he went in.
Look how Hoffman started his article: “Iran began
easing physical distancing restrictions. Officials also lifted the ban on
travel between cities and re-opened low risk businesses, while their TV showed
scenes of crowded streets and packed buses and trains.” What's wrong with that,
you ask? Nothing. Everybody else is opening up, be they in Asia, Europe or
America. But look how Hoffman spun the news to give false credence to his point
of view: “The clerics felt the pressure to risk their citizens' lives to
relieve the economic pain.” Was the economic pressure felt only in Iran, or was
it felt in the other places as well?
So, what is Hoffman's point of view? It is that Iran
is doing so badly economically as a result of Trump's maximum pressure on it,
America is one hair away from scoring a big victory, and must therefore
maintain Iran on the hook during these trying times under the strain of the
COVID-19 crisis.
Hoffman went on to list many of the false stereotypes,
the Jews have created about Iran, and then accused its leaders of the
following: “Iran is facing international opposition to its request from the IMF
for a $5 billion loan, which Tehran claims is needed to fight the coronavirus.
But a $5 billion IMF loan would only finance new nuclear and ballistic missile
development”.
To say that Iran is facing international opposition to
its request for a $5 billion IMF loan is to tell a stinky lie. That's because
the whole world, including America's closest allies in Europe, are in favor of
the loan being approved. In fact, the only one opposed to it, is Jewish
America; an act that comes as a clear affront to normal Americans, many of whom
have argued for approving the loan, but were dismissed by the likes of Daniel
Hoffman as being left-wing progressives.
As if this were not enough, Hoffman went on to
ascertain with the authority of a CIA veteran that: “A $5 billion IMF loan
would only go to finance new nuclear and ballistic missile development.” And
that's how––like the typical Jew that he is––he paved the way for shooting
himself in the foot.
Having said at the start that, “The clerics felt the
pressure to risk their citizens' lives to relieve the economic pain,” by which
he meant to say that Iran's economy was collapsing, he then went on to say
that, “A $5 billion loan would only go to finance new nuclear and ballistic
missile development.” And he ended the article saying that, “There is nothing
to be gained by letting Iran evade the choice between military [preparedness]
and providing for its people. The international community must do the right
thing,” which means that Iran's economy is not collapsing, and that the world
must do what it can to help it collapse.
And that's not the only big contradiction you'll
encounter in the Daniel Hoffman article. He said that America withdrew from the
Iran Nuclear Deal but did not abrogate it because there was nothing to
abrogate, given that the deal was not ratified by the American Senate. It was a
deal that never came into effect according to Daniel Hoffman and all those like
him. But he went on to damn Iran for violating the deal, which he says never
was. Here is how Hoffman told the world about Iran's misbehavior:
“Iran began exceeding the limit on its stockpile of
low enriched uranium set under the Nuclear Deal, citing the US withdrawal from
it. Iran also tripled its stockpile of enriched uranium in violation of the
deal. Its current stockpile brings it close to the amount needed to produce a
nuclear weapon. Iran has claimed every measure was reversible if the US
sanctions were lifted”.
So then, why not lift the sanctions and see Iran
change its behavior, maybe even become a friend of America the way it was
during the Shah years?
Until we get an answer to that question, here is
another question: Does the secret that Hoffman is hiding, have anything to do
with the Jewish wish to instigate a war between the US and Iran?