No one has yet found a way to make oppression a permanent feature of dominion over others, whatever their dominion may have been. Our natural inclination as human beings, written in our genetic code, is to be free to roam throughout our environment, exploring it and continually deciding what to do next.
From ancient times to modern
times, some of the people who rose to power, believed they could increase their
power by suppressing the desires of others, and gifting themselves with the
rewards earned by those whom they oppressed. That's when the oppressed began to
warn the tyrannical oppressors of consequences they may not like if they
continue on the path they chose to be on. The oppressed made the warning clear
by writing messages that the oppressors could read on the wall.
Ever since that time, and
despite the warnings, there still came evil men who ignored the lessons
established by their predecessors, and oppressed their people in the belief
that they found the formula by which to exercise a tyrannical control over
their subjects, and make it a permanent feature of their dominion.
Those tyrants failed in their
attempts because, however strong their desire to grab what belongs to others
may have been, it never became stronger than the desire of the masses to be
free throughout the ages. In fact, the writing on the wall was modernized,
becoming the paper trail that tells the story of humanity's continuous struggle
to live in freedom. In turn, the paper trail became the thread of social media
whose contribution has been to demonstrate how silly it is for some people to
claim they are defending the freedom of others when they are themselves kept
like test animals in the cage of fear and self-censorship.
A clear example of one such
condition, out of the many you’ll encounter in North America, is shown in the
article that came under the title: “The consequences of campus cancel culture,”
written by Jennifer Shubert-Akin, and published on March 27, 2021 in The
Washington Examiner.
In that article, the writer,
Shubert-Akin laments that a law professor was fired from her job because she
said that black students scored at the bottom of her class. But that same
writer never voiced as much as a hiss of discontent when a black principal,
William Latson was fired because he admitted he didn't know enough about the
Holocaust to vouch that it happened, let alone talk about it with authority.
This is a demonstration of the
self-censorship that makes its practitioners look like test animals of the
jackass variety, as they bray inside the cage of self-censorship where they
lock themselves. They are at the same time laughable and poignantly disgusting
because when someone of their kind touches the subject of freedom, even with a
ten-foot pole, they pull freedom down to the level of a Jewish sewer. It's an
insult to freedom for this kind of creatures to claim they have the ability to
defend it.
It is therefore not surprising
that the masses have turned to the modern wall of social media on which they
express the warning that the current condition needs to change or there will be
dire consequences. And this prompts us to ask the question: Why is it that when
it comes to Jews, dire consequences mean much more than a simple tossing of
rascals out of office and replacing them with others?
In response to that question,
there is a way to see and study how the differences develop between a case
where Jews are involved, and another where Jews are not involved. Consider the
story of Romania's Nicolae Ceausescu whose execution by one of his own, ended
the Romanian revolt and kept it a strictly Romanian affair. Contrast this with
the German situation which started with the anti-Jewish riots of Crystal Night,
and ended with the execution of millions of Jews both in Germany and outside of
it by millions of enthusiastically self-appointed executioners.
The difference between those
two situations, is that Ceausescu was the object of his people's wrath. When
they decided they had enough of his tyrannical rule, they got rid of him, and
that was the end of the story. In Germany, by contrast, the people sensed that
the tyranny imposed on them was coming from the outside via the Jews who
pretended to be loyal to Germany but were loyal to World Jewry and the foreign
powers that backed them, such as France and Britain. They became willing
executioners of Hitler, and vented their wrath on the Jews, both in Germany and
outside of it.
What does that portend for
Jewry in America? No one can tell how the situation will unfold in the future
but events such as Charlottesville on August 12, 2017 and the Capitol on
January 6, 2021, give an indication of what's in the hearts and minds of those
who believe the Jews have conspired with America’s leaders to rob them of what
belongs to them, and give it to the Jews.
This is visceral motivation
caused by bottled up frustrations. It is powerful, mindless and when set off,
will not respond to reasonable appeals.
Horror will be the aftermath of those in revolt as they respond to the tyrannical rule of the Jews and the ignorance of those like Jennifer Shubert-Akin who believe they can liberate those whom the Jews oppress, by stepping harder on the necks of Blacks and the other colored minorities.