There is no end to the examples that one can cite about the fact that Zionism has been allowed to run wild in the English speaking countries but once in a while you get one of those examples which by its nature exposes the reality that Zionism poses a greater threat to Western Civilization than anything seen previously or anything conceivable in the future. The following is one such example.
There was a time in the Nineteen Nineties when the Federal Minister of Justice in Canada was Alan Rock. Being a lawyer and the Minister of Justice, you would expect him to know the fundamental principles upon which the system of justice is based. He may or may not have learned about those principles in high school but he must have learned about them in college or law school.
The two legs upon which the system of justice rests in a democracy are the Doctrine and the Jurisprudence. The first is a collection of opinions expressed by the notables in the field over the ages. For example, the notables may have written about the role of Justice or about its influence on society, or they may have written about a specific subject such as Human Rights. As for Jurisprudence, it is a collection of the cases that were adjudicated in the past.
Thus, when the Court is seized with a case and there is a trial, the lawyers on both sides of the dispute look for passages in the doctrine that agree with their point of view, and for cases in the jurisprudence that support the outcome they advocate for their client. They present all of that to the presiding judge and hope to influence his or her decision. The judge will take these presentations seriously and will be influenced by them because Justice is supposed to be handed down uniformly. That is, if someone was jailed one day for threatening his neighbor in Town A last week, the same sentence should be handed to someone who threatens his neighbor in Town B this week. Of course, if the law has changed in the interim or if a higher court has reversed the decision of the past, everyone is faced with a new ball game and they all return to square one.
Thus, something happening in real life and adjudicated in a Court of Law based on the evidence sets a precedent that enters the annals of Jurisprudence and serves as model to guide future cases. This principle is so sacred that to violate it is to make a mockery of the entire system of justice. Yet, while Minister of Justice, Alan Rock tried to violate it. Not only that, he announced triumphantly that he had a great idea he was going to implement. He was going to use the Executive Tribunals to rule in a certain way so as to set the precedent by which the Courts of Law will rule in the future.
But what is an Executive Tribunal? This is a creature not of the Constitution which would have made it independent of the other branches of government, but a creature of the Legislature which makes it much less independent. Such tribunals are set up because some cases are deemed to be so specialized, it is better to try them by judges who have extra training in the field. Also, the trial or the hearing as it is often called is done in a setting that is less formal and less adversarial than in a Court of Law. Human Rights and Workmen’s Compensation tribunals are two examples of an Executive Tribunal.
Despite the fact that judges of the regular system of justice despise these tribunals and make no secret of it, they cannot always ignore the precedents they set. And this is where Alan Rock comes into the picture. Pressured by the Canadian Jewish Congress, he wanted to make the tribunals sentence suspected Nazi collaborators living in Canada to be deported and thus set the precedent that will influence judges in the regular Courts of Law. And here is where this idea is asinine, instead of having a real trial where all the evidence is brought to light under an adversarial setting and adjudicated on the merit of the case, Alan Rock was going to take the idea fantasized by someone at the Canadian Jewish Congress and make it the model to guide future judges.
This was such a grotesque manifestation of a level of ignorance that is so profound, someone had to speak up. My Jewish friends in Montreal, some of whom were layers, and one being old enough to remember what contributed to the resentment of the Jews in Europe decades earlier, spoke to me about it saying how fearful they were at what was happening. But they dared not speak publicly because Jews and Gentiles alike feared the power of the Canadian Jewish Congress. And so, I spoke out publicly for me and for my friends. Luckily for everyone concerned and for the sake of the system, Alan Rock backed off.
Since that time the Zionists have continued to attack the system upon which rest the tenets of Western Civilization such as academic freedom, the assumption of innocence until one is proven guilt, freedom of speech, equality before the law, the right to be represented by counsel and so on and so on and so on.
Ironically, these same Zionists win many of the battles they engage in by threatening to go to court where they would use to their advantage the very system they tear to shreds. In addition, having ample reasons to distrust what the system of justice has become, ordinary citizens often give in to the blackmail rather than test their cases in court.
But if a citizen decides to see the Zionists in Court as some do, they often come to regret the decision because they meet judges with an IQ that does not surpass that of Alan Rock. And if the citizen is lucky enough to meet a judge with an IQ that allows him or her to understand what is meant by all citizens are equal before the law and thus treat everyone equally, the Zionists drag the case in court for ever.
They do that by using the delaying tactics inserted into the procedure to give the lawyers time to adequately prepare for the cases they represent if and when they need time. But the aim of the Zionists in using the privilege would be to postpone the day of reckoning until such time that the judge they do not like is replaced or until their opponent is ruined by the legal expenses and quits before the end. The Zionists call this outcome making the opponent cry uncle.
One of the most notorious characters to abuse the system of justice for a long time in the United States of America is Alan Dershowitz whose claim to fame was earned by what he accomplished outside the courtroom than inside it, being endowed with a big mouth and plagued with low intelligence.
And so while people admire his audacity, they are dismayed by the stand of the Harvard Law School which Dershowitz uses as a ladder to take his profile from that of a nobody to that of a somebody. And ever since the man said you cannot blame Israel for doing to the Palestinians what someone else has done before, people have wondered how much longer Harvard will keep silent as Israel inflicts on the Palestinians what Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pol Pot, the Serbian and Rwandan killers have inflicted on the innocent.
In the final analysis, Dershowitz and those like him represent a great threat to Western Civilization but not because they are smart enough to hurt it every time they so decide. They are a threat because Dershowitz and a few like him were made into the poster boys of intellectual achievement by the Harvards of America despite the fact that these characters could not carry the bag for say, an Idi Amin.
And this is what makes institutions like Harvard fall to depths of disrepute that were never imagined before the ascendance of Zionism in America. Sadly, these institutions are stuck with the present condition because of a provision in the rules that says they cannot discipline let alone get rid of a tenured character like Dershowitz no matter what the character has mutated into. Something will have to give sometime soon.