History is on the march and as always, the Jews (real, fake,
new converts and old hacks) find themselves wailing not just at the wailing
wall that is in Jerusalem but also the wailing wall without stones they carried
inside of them throughout history as if to prove that you can take the Jew out
of misery but you cannot take the misery and the constant wailing out of the
Jew.
Two recent articles written by so-called Jews illustrate
that point. The first was written by Charles Krauthammer and published on June
20, 2013 in National Review Online under the title: “Syria: America Sidelined”
and the subtitle: “After Iraq, Obama wasted a golden opportunity to keep a
presence in the region.” As to the second article, it was written by Thomas L.
Friedman and was published on June 23, 2013 in New York Times under the title:
“Syria Scoreboard”. It is to be noted that Krauthammer exhibits some Hebraic
features which would indicate he may have one or two drops of Semitic blood in him.
As to Friedman, he is no more a Semite than I am from Planet Vulcan – however
much I wish I were.
Let's begin the analysis by dissecting the second article.
To go back in time and look at the metaphorical big picture, Friedman looks at
the region of the Middle East from what he
says is 30,000 feet up. He sees the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World
War I, the entry of Britain
and France
into the region as colonial powers, and their exit from it after World War II.
The result of that history, says he, is that the power to rule over the people
was handed to local monarchs and generals, people that managed to keep “their
diverse populations in line with iron fists.”
But now that the monarchs and the generals have been pushed
out of power, the populations in six Arab countries are left with the question
of self governance and how to achieve it. Friedman does not say how this can be
done but zeroes in on Syria ,
one of the countries he cited. He says that the US President, Barack Obama, plans
to arm the rebels who are fighting in a place where one scenario from among
three will unfold. But he adds that none of the scenarios feels “very good
because those fighting for a democratic outcome are weak and divided.”
Well, the trouble has always been that when a real or fake
Jew speaks of his desire for democracy, he sounds like Jack the Ripper speaking
of his desire for women. This aside, Friedman looked from 30,000 feet up to see
events unfold from the time of the Ottoman Empire
to this day when he should have been looking from higher up and from further
back in time. He would have gotten a broader view of what happened in the past,
and a better insight as to how things can be done more intelligently now.
Going as far back in time as the Roman Empire, we see that
the seat of power moved from Rome in Italy to Constantinople in the Byzantine
Empire . Constantinople is now called Istanbul
which is situated in modern Turkey
that was the seat of the Ottoman Empire up to
the First World War. Shortly after the establishment of Byzantium ,
a protracted war erupted between it and the Persian Empire .
The result has been the weakening of the two, which is what allowed the Muslim
tribes from the Arabian Peninsula to conquer
both and spread Islam among them.
The Arabs then brought under their banner most of what was
the Roman Empire and most of what was the Persian Empire .
Thus, they managed to extend their civilization across three continents, from
the shores of Spain
(Andalusia) on the Atlantic Ocean to the mountain ranges of the Himalayas in Northern India . And for the first time since antiquity,
diverse people of all races, skin color and religions were brought to live
together in peace and harmony not because the sword of Alexander the Great hung
over their heads or because the Roman legions fed them to the lions if they did
not, but because the Arabs taught them to live the civilized life of tolerance
and inclusion that the ancients had developed thousands of years earlier and
left it for the Arabs to inherit and live by.
A manifestation of that peaceful way of life has been the
manner with which power was handed over from one ruler to the next. At first,
it went through four successors (caliphs in Arabic) who ruled the growing
empire from their seat in the Arabian Peninsula .
After that, power was transferred to one dynasty after the other, each in a
different country – such as the Umayyads who ruled out of Damascus ,
the Abbasids who ruled out of Baghdad and the
Ottomans who ruled out of Constantinople .
The question to ask now is this: If Planet Earth has managed
to go through seven thousand years of development during which time it advanced
to the level of the ancient civilizations, then sunk to the depth of the
European dark ages, then experienced an Arab inspired renaissance, then had a
scientific and industrial revolutions only to create a system called democracy
that does not seem to work too well even now – why should we look at that
system and consider it to be the model that Syria or any country must duplicate
to be viewed as a success story?
The answer is that there is not one good reason why it
should be so. In fact, like it or not, the universe will unfold as it should,
will do it on its own, and will do it as it sees fit – to paraphrase the
immortal Desiderata. But to understand the reason for the continued wailing of
the Jews, we turn to the Krauthammer article, and parse it to see what
motivates these people now.
He begins by describing the current situation in Syria as he
sees it. He says it is a civil war where the enemy side receives outside help
but that the would-be natural ally of America
receives nothing because President Obama dodged the chemical-weapons red line,
and because Iran and Russia reached
for regional hegemony. And this – he goes on to say – is proof that “Obama has
been forced back into the very vacuum he created.” Well, is this wailing? You
bet it is. But look how he does that:
He says: “The tragedy is that we once had a counterweight
and Obama threw it away.” This is a fantasy that Krauthammer has created in his
mind about the situation in Iraq .
To force the reader to accept it, he mutilates the history of the war but
sugarcoats his creation by making an admission at the start to the effect that
all was not perfect in that war. Thus, he says this: “Whatever the wisdom of
the Iraq
war in the first place … the war was won.” Hoping that the reader will swallow
this fabrication, he now builds on it: “We had a golden opportunity to reap the
rewards of this too-bloody war.” This done, he lets out his wailing cry: “With
our evacuation, however, Iraqi airspace today effectively belongs to Iran .” He
blamed it all on someone else then wailed.
But the truth is that even before George W. Bush was elected
to the presidency of the United States ,
the Jewish organizations had drawn up a war plan to destroy Iraq . When 9/11
happened and the W retaliated by bombing Afghanistan and decided to stop here,
there came and explosion of opinions from the likes of Friedman and Krauthammer
in print and in the audio-visuals, all demanding that America destroy Iraq as
well. A memorable moment in the history of the Judeo-Israeli control of America happened when Thomas L. Friedman of the
New York Times stood in Israel
(that's foreign soil) and relayed a stern warning via television to the
American President. He said in effect, neglect destroying Iraq and you
will suffer the same fate as your father who was booted out of office when the
time came to reelect him.
And it was this war that created the current situation. But
nothing should surprise you about any of this because it has been the history
of Jews that they take advantage of every situation and score a few successes
at the start. But because they never think of the consequences of their
actions, they overdo things and always lose in the end. It stands to reason,
therefore, that when they took command of America , they were going to repeat
that same history for their possession.
And this is what is happening at this time. Thus, the Jews
now have a wailing wall made of stones in Jerusalem
where they can go and wail about their fate. And they have a wailing wall made
not of stones but of the invisible either where they can wail all they want
about screwing up the only friend they had, the one that is now sick and tired
of them.
As to the events in the Middle East ,
the solution is negotiation between the parties to reach a compromise. This is
what the Russians and the Iranians are calling for. Let America miss this opportunity by listen to the
mindless voices that call for the adoption of a hard line, and America will someday be forced to turn Mount Rushmore into its own wailing wall.