On June 5, 2013 the editors of the Wall Street Journal (WSJ)
came up with an editorial to which they gave the title: “The Old New Egypt” and
the subtitle: “Cairo
sentences 43 democratic activists to prison.” They tell what it's all about in
the opening paragraph: “The charges include operating illegal nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) and receiving funds without permission.” Then they tell
what they think of the whole subject matter in a short sentence: “Egypt 's spiral
down continues.”
Well, there has been talk lately about some kind of al-Qaeda
publication that tells the world what it thinks of America 's doings. Suppose now that
its editors write something like this: “Washington
sentences KSM to prison for an indefinite period of time. America 's
spiral down continues.” Reading this, any sane person would say that the
savages have spoken, and they are condemning the civilized behavior of the
sovereign country of America .
By the same token, the editors of the WSJ have proven themselves to be savages,
and they are condemning the civilized behavior of the sovereign country of Egypt .
The savages that America is putting on trial,
including KSM, wish to take the world back in time. As well, the savages who
edit the WSJ are presided over by Rupert Murdoch who never hides the sentiment
he wants to take America
back to the Nineteenth century; to a time when gunboat diplomacy was the order
of the day. Rupert Murdoch is the KSM of journalism whether he is in Australia , Europe or North
America . Like al-Qaeda, he has a worldwide reach and he is
dangerous.
Where did he and his people go wrong? To answer the question
we begin with the view that “the more things change, the more they remain the
same.” In fact, it may seem that way to some people depending on what they are
looking at. But looking at the same phenomenon, another group people would say
that “the more things change, the more they do change.” Why is that? It is
because no one looks at something and sees the whole thing. Each looks at a
portion of it and sees no change at all, or sees some kind of change.
This happens because everyone expects to see something
different with regard to any phenomenon. In the case of the Middle East, for
example, the change that characters such as the editors of the WSJ want to see
are governments made of pimps and prostitutes, madams and gigolos modeled after
the Jewish toilet bowl they call congress of the USA . Either this or they want to
see a Middle East that is completely
disintegrating. They are not seeing this happen to Egypt
and so they feel the bile stir violently enough in their bellies to pronounce
with confidence that “Egypt 's
spiral down continues.” Of course, these same people believe that the American
congress is spiraling upward. But who else in the world cares, anyway? Nobody.
So then, is there change happening in the Middle
East ? Yes there is. Whether it is in North Africa, the Levant or Turkey , the
people who were brought up under harsh but open and honest conditions are revolting,
and they are questioning their current human condition, including the role of
religion in their daily lives.
In contrast, religion is coming back to America with a
vengeance not because it is growing out of the grassroots but because it is
responding to the soft but subtle and dishonest saturation of the landscape by
a Jewish encroachment that is seen to grow everywhere like unwanted weed. But
who else in the world cares, anyway? Nobody.
Rupert Murdoch would do well to direct the fires of his gunboat
at the American congress of pimps and prostitutes, madams and gigolos, and
leave the Middle East alone. This place is now
in the hands of those who know how to start a civilization, maintain it for
thousands of years, evolve it when it needs to change, and start fresh when the
time is ripe. They do not need the help of a Murdoch or his board of editorial
snorts.