Do you think it is possible for someone to stand in Russia , China ,
Brazil , Japan , Portugal
or maybe France , Iran , Nigeria ,
Sweden or Australia – and treat a press secretary of the
government the way that White House and State Department press secretaries are
treated in America ?
Not on your life.
That's because unlike America , the local and foreign
journalists in those countries – as everywhere else in the world – know what
will happen to them if they get out of line. They'll be told straight in the
face: “Get your Jewish ass out of this building or I'll have security grab you
by the seat of your pants and throw you to the hungry dogs out there who know
what to do with the likes of you”.
But why is America
treated by the Jews as if a colony of inferior beings? This is a good question,
and so we look for an answer in a piece that came under the title “Iran 's $400
Million Payoff,” written by the editors of National Review Online (NRO), and
published on August 5, 2016. These are so-called journalists discussing a
journalistic event that took place in Iran . Here is how they introduced
the subject to their readers:
“The Obama administration delivered $400 million in cash to Tehran on the same day that Iran released four Americans held
as enemies. Administration officials deny that this was a 'ransom' payment, but
if not, someone forgot to tell Tehran .
An Iranian general informed state media: 'Taking this much money back was in
return for the release of the American spies'”.
What were these editors trying to establish with a
half-assed remark of this caliber: “If not [a ransom] someone forgot to tell Tehran ”? The fact is that
the Iranian general was asked a question that must have gone like this: Why are
we getting this money from America ?
And he responded that the transaction was part of a deal to settle outstanding
disputes between the two countries. It included the swap of American prisoners
for Iranian money.
This is how civilized professionals give and take with each
other, it is how they show respect for their audience, and why none of them
worries about being hit with a vague gotcha question aimed at making them look
like inferior representatives of a helpless colony – which is how things unfold
in America these days. In fact, this is the sorry state to which America 's
journalistic culture has deteriorated since it was taken over by the Jews.
Instead of exchanging ideas and generating new ones to sift
through and choose the most relevant among them to organize in a coherent whole
and reach conclusions that lead to a plan of action, the Jews have instructed America to discard
the tried and proven old method, and replace it with the useless Jewish haggle
of even older times. Here is a perfect example of Jewish inspired uselessness:
“Obama's dealings with Iran
have followed a grim pattern: American pusillanimity followed by Iranian
provocations followed by American capitulation. Rinse and repeat … The U.S.
government being in the business of paying off hostage-takers will come as
welcome news to America 's
enemies”.
However, the fact is that no one but America has a
Guantanamo-like camp where kidnapped innocent civilians and combatants are kept
indefinitely without trial. Also, no one but the Americans impound money and
property left in their custody by foreigners. Thus, no one but America gets to
be in a position to engineer a ransom-type situation, and benefit from it. In
fact, this happened in a number of occasions only because the government
followed Jewish instructions and acted in a way that turned out to be very
amateurish.
To get a sense of how this sort of thing happens in America and
nowhere else, we look at the following passage in the NRO editorial:
“The administration abased itself. The release of Americans
should have been a precondition for any negotiations on Iran's nuclear regime …
In the course of the talks that led to the nuclear deal, Iran secured frozen
assets, sanctions relief and the release of Iranians justly imprisoned in the
U.S. for crimes, for hacking the U.S. power-grid database – and an agreement to
drop 14 extradition requests”.
What on earth are the editors haggling about in this
passage? They are saying, in effect, they don't care about the transaction
looking like a ransom payment. What upsets them is that America did not
conduct a hard nosed negotiation with the Iranians. Thus, we can only deduce
that the Jews would not have called the exchange of prisoners a ransom payment
if America had gotten a
little something for Israel
in the nuclear agreement.