The Palestinian resistance movement known as Hamas has done
something typically human that Israel
was never able to do, and still cannot do because it was not equipped for that.
It is that Hamas has been communicating with the world in
writing, which is the method by which human beings communicate the solemn
things in life. And Hamas has done it again to reinforce its humanity one more
time. All the while, Israel
and its enablers in America
and elsewhere continue to communicate with the world through the body language
that's typically comprehensible to animals only … and maybe their human
trainers too.
First, bear in mind that Hamas is only a “waffle” movement
that broke off from the Palestinian Authority which itself, is not even a
government. Second, bear in mind that Hamas has had a Charter (a document equal
to a constitution required only of nations) and has now issued a discussion
paper called “Document of General Principles and Policies.” The purpose of the
latter is to prepare for the anticipated amendment of the Charter; something
that civilized governments do from time to time. So the question is this: Where
does Israel
that has no charter or constitution, stand compared to all that? The answer is
this: Light years behind Hamas.
Daniel Levy, a former Israeli negotiator, wrote an article
in which he discusses the new Hamas document, and compares it with the existing
Hamas Charter. His article came under the title: “Hamas Gets an Ideological
Makeover,” published on May 5, 2017 in The National Interest.
Those who are old enough to remember the 1960s must have
retained mental images of emotionally unsettled and awestricken American
officials – from members of the administration to federal and state legislators
to state governors – as they streamed across the oceans on their way to Israel
where they had themselves photoed with a shovel in the hand “helping” Israel
continue the magnificent work of greening the Negev Desert … which by the way,
remains yellow to this day as can be verified with the click that summons
Google Earth.
This is one example of the pictorial representations that
the Israelis and their enablers in America have relentlessly employed to
communicate to the American decision makers the notion that they must never
deny Israel what the officials ask for because anything they receive will be
used to green the desert, and do the marvelous things that the Palestinians
don't know how to do, or will not do even if shown how to do them.
The Americans bought and consumed all that garbage without
question or treatment or processing, and returned home where they spread the
satanic gospel among their counterparts across the Republic. They spoke about
an Israel whose needs must
become priority number one in America ,
ahead of the American public itself.
People who discover that they have a similar vision and a
common purpose in life, come together and “cast in stone” their bonding into a
union to confer on it the solemnity it deserves. Because the paper has replaced
the stone tablet of an earlier era, a document is now used to record the event.
What is written on it can be the wedding charter of two individuals, the
incorporating charter of a few investors or the constitutional charter of the
multitude that has come together to form a nation.
The constitution tells who the people are; where they are or
where they plan to be; what their vision is and how they will strive to get
there. Acting on the human impulse that motivates it, Hamas that's not a nation
or even an authority, saw fit to give itself a constitutional charter. Contrast
this with an Israel
that pretends to be a nation but has not done likewise in 69 years of pretense
that it is a nation. How to explain that?
We do not have to do research far and wide to find the
answer. The Israelis and their cohorts everywhere tell their story with their
body language. Like chameleons that mimic the color and shape of the
environment in which they find themselves, those who go to live in Israel
cannot define themselves by a banner of one color or a stripe of one shape.
Depending on the audience they address at any given time, they can be the
Communists of the kibbutz one day, and the Neocons of Wall Street the next day.