Reading an article that was written by Matthew Levitt and
Maxine Rich in which they slander someone, memories rushed through my mind of
the cowardly animals at the Canadian Jewish Congress who mounted a similar campaign
of denigration against me, and maintained it for nearly half a century.
It is that I had written an article some half a century ago
under the title: “Don't listen to propaganda, Egypt is a civilized country,”
and the Canadian Jewish Congress decided there was sufficient reason here to
warn the government of Canada that I was so dangerous, it must mobilize itself
and interfere with everything I do. Their recommendation was that I must not be
allowed to grow enough or rise enough that I might someday tell my story to the
world, and be taken seriously.
Properly and duly incited, the Canadian government literally
spent millions of dollars working hand in hand with the animals to implement
that hideous recommendation. How something like this can happen in a place
calling itself a liberal democracy says a great deal about the bogus nature of
liberal democracy, and a great deal more about the destructive power of
political Judaism.
And now that the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas has
written its “Document of General Principles and Policies,” you see Levitt and
Rich launch the drive to incite the American government, urging it to do to the
Palestinian people what the Jewish-Congress/Canadian-Government demonic
alliance did to me. To this end, they wrote: “Hamas's Moderate Rhetoric Belies
Militant Activities,” an article that was published on May 1, 2017 on the
website of the Washington Institute.
They do not call the Hamas document by name, but refer to it
as the “new statement,” and immediately opine that it “will mean nothing
without changes” in the behavior of Hamas. And then, by the screwy logic which
drives political Judaism, they let it be known they are certain that Hamas will
not change because “Hamas's recent actions offer a clear indication of the
group's continued hardline militancy”.
And so, the two authors tell the readers how that militancy
is manifested. They do it under five subheadings which are: The Hamas Charter,
Hamas Preparations for War, Hamas Smuggling, Hamas in the West
Bank , and Hamas in Sinai. But having left out the new document
which contains Hamas's new ideas for the future, they discuss the old Charter
to make it sound like its content – and not that of the new document – is what
Hamas will take into the future. It is a deception of the most Jewish kind.
In any case, we ask: what do they say is horrible about the
old Charter, anyway? Well, they opine that “Hamas has been explicitly dedicated
to Israel 's
destruction,” without quoting a relevant passage because there is none. This
done, they quote the Charter as saying: “There is no solution for the
Palestinian question except through Jihad. Initiatives, proposals and
international conferences are all a waste of time”.
I ask you, my friend, do you see the huge lie in the paragraph
above? It is there in the use of the word “explicitly.” The fact is that
nowhere in the Charter is there explicit or implicit mention of Israel 's
destruction. As to the saying that negotiations have been a waste of time; this
is to tell the Jews that Hamas agrees with what they have been saying since the
Oslo Agreement: the negotiations have been a waste of time because it's what
the Jews want.
But what to make of the word “jihad”? It is that Western
audiences have been “educated” to the false notion that jihad means holy war.
That's not true; “jihad” is a noun that translates into “striving,” whereas the
verb derived from it means to strive. If an Arab says “jihad fee sabeel Allah,”
which translates into “striving for the sake of God,” he means holy war.
Otherwise, people in the Arab World strive (do jihad) at every moment of their
waking hours to make it through the day, earning a living and raising a family
if they are an adult. Or they strive in their studies to get good grades, if
they are a student. Right now I am doing an enormous jihad to explain the
meaning of an Arab expression to an English speaking audience … and it's not
easy.
Still, the idea of destroying a nation is not alien to the
people of the Middle East . However, it is the
Jews that have destroyed Palestine ,
and it is they who continue to oppose its revival. That's because they adhere
to the religious belief that there is a place in Palestine for only one people. In their view,
it is they or it is the Palestinians.
Thus, the fear of their destruction is generated not by
someone's threat against them; it is generated by their own paranoia, which is
the byproduct of a disease called Holocaust psychosis.
The article by Matthew Levitt and Maxine Rich is but a
single incident in a never ending series of occurrences that is constantly
added to by the worldwide crime syndicate known as World Jewry.
That thing keeps going without exhausting itself because it
relies on the Jewish genius of convincing those they rape of paying them for
their service.