Here is an example that shows why at the end of every run,
the Jews prove to have screwed up everything they touched. What's boggling –
but no longer surprising – is that they always argue they did everything right
except that the antisemitism of others prevented them from getting their due
rewards.
While no such argument is offered this time, there is plenty
that shows how the Jews begin every run with a lie that's designed to give
credence to their fantasy and with this, start the ball rolling. The example in
question is an article that came under the title: “Trump and the promise (and
pitfalls) of Mideast peace,” written by Benny
Avni and published on May 22, 2017 in the New York Post.
To understand the author's thinking, we must begin with the
reality that a situation called status quo already exists. From the title of
the article, we understand that the writer has developed expectations for the
future, but warns that everything may come to naught. What we need to know,
therefore, is the basis of Avni's expectations, and whether or not they were
pushed to the level of fantasy. As well, we need to know if the pitfalls
mentioned in the title are real or if they are the expression of fear that the
status quo may be altered negatively. That is, instead of altering to realize
the fantasy, the status quo may alter and make it impossible to achieve the
fantasy.
The first indication we get that Avni is building a monument
of cards, comes early and goes on – peppered throughout the article to the end.
It unfolds like this: “Trump's language about Muslims has gotten him in trouble
[but] the Sunnis were more concerned about America's tilt to Shiite Persia …
The Sunni leaders quietly turned to Israel in recent years … In this newfound
amity, Trump sees potential for peace between Israel and the Arabs”.
In fact, Avni bases his assessment of the current situation
on what President Trump has said upon his return from Saudi Arabia ,
and what happened during his sojourn there. He reports that Trump said this:
“Their [Arab] feeling toward Israel
is positive.” As to what happened during his stay there, Avni recounts these
events: “There's progress: In the 1970s, a Jewish secretary of state,
Kissinger, needed a permit to enter the Kingdom. This week, envoy Greenblatt
got kosher meals there”.
This is a non-story that Avni has turned into a pillar
supporting his fantasy. The reality is that in the 1970s, the Egyptian army had
crossed the Suez Canal , and was mopping up the
Sinai of the Israelis that had invaded it. Despite the fact that President
Sadat of Egypt had assured
President Nixon of the United States
that he will not cross the border into Israel ,
America intervened in that
war against Egypt .
And Saudi Arabia responded
by instituting an oil embargo against the United States .
When the Americans indicated their desire to talk to their
Saudi “friends” about the situation, the latter insisted that the envoy America will
send, obtain an entry visa before coming. It happened that the envoy was Henry
Kissinger who needed the visa not because he was a Jew, but because he was
American. As to envoy Jason Greenblatt, he may have eaten kosher meals in Saudi Arabia ,
but he tasted the graceful nature of the celebrated Arab hospitality.
But why is there a need to build a house of cards in the
first place? The simple answer is this: To perpetuate the fantasy that the mob
of Jewish pundits has been pushing for sometime to reassure the rank-and-file.
It is this: “Arab leaders never really cared about the Palestinians much … In
the end, uniting against Iran
may well be more important to them. Which means they'll give a bit on the
Palestinian issue”.
Finally, what would be the worth of a Jewish article if it
did not contain a lie that's based on mutilated history, fashioned to slander
an exemplary human being they detest? Go through everything that a Jew has said
during the last half century, and you'll find the Jewish rejection of the call
to peace “now” because the Palestinians rejected it “previously”.
Here it is one more time, expressed by Benny Avni: “Will
Arab leaders lean on the Palestinians to drop unreasonable demands … Abbas is
demanding to start talks from where they stopped last tine when he said no to
concessions made by Ehud Olmert. And Palestinians scoffed at this week's
Israeli gestures. Netanyahu partners oppose those concessions anyway”.
In other words, Avni says: blame the failure on Abbas
because I am telling you he said no previously, even if you're hearing
Netanyshu's partners say no at this time.