If you want a definition for what it means to have a frame
of mind fashioned in the sewer, here is one:
While Israel
is occupying a country named Palestine , Jews
everywhere argue for America
not to interfere, as it is trying to do with the effort to help forge a peace
deal between it and the Palestinians. The reason given is that the idea poses a
danger to the security interests of Israel .
And while this argument is repeated by the Jews over and
over again, another parallel argument, also articulated by Jews, has it that America is
obligated to interfere everywhere in the Arab and Muslim worlds without
reservation. Why? Because this is in the security interests of Israel .
Now, my friend it is up to you to judge who has a frame of
mind that is fashioned more deeply in the sewer. Is it the Jews who keep
articulating such double standard positions for America to embrace? Or is it the
American officials who listen to the Jews and incorporate their advice in the
decisions they take, thus make the same fatal mistakes over and over again?
Now look at the latest example of Jewish advice to America , and be
prepared to scream with rage. The example came in the form of an editorial
written under the title: “Trump shouldn't repeat Obama's mistake in Iraq and Syria ,” published on October 21,
2017 in the Washington Post.
You'll catch the editors moan in the first paragraph of the
editorial about America not
meeting the “complex challenges in Iraq
and Syria ,” and doing so “at
the expense of the U.S.
allies.” You'll also catch them groan that: “if there is a countering American
strategy, it isn't evident.” And so, you want to know who may be the allies
that the editors feel are worth groaning for and moaning about.
You'll find the answer in the last two paragraphs of the
article where Israel and
only Israel
is mentioned – not once, but three times. And of course, when the interests of Israel are mentioned, no editorial writer in America escapes the imperative of warning that
if Israel 's
needs are not met, there will be dire consequences. Here they are in the words
of the Post editors: “A failure by the United
States to defend its ally will lead only to more war, the
rise of new terrorist threats and, ultimately, the necessity of more U.S.
intervention”.
The obvious question to ask is this: Speaking for the Jewish
establishment as they always do, what do the editors of the Washington Post
mean when they say that failure by the United States to defend its ally
will lead to more war? Taken at face value, this sentence makes no sense.
That's because if we assume that someone will attack Israel ,
a state of war will have existed whether or not America
decides to defend Israel .
But if we do not take the sentence at face value, and we
assume that the Jews are warning America that Israel will attack someone to
force America to come rescue Israel, the sentence begins to make sense. And
there is a name for this kind of behavior; it is called blackmail. In fact,
this is not the first time that Israel
engaged in this kind of criminal behavior. It did it during the negotiations
that led to the Iran nuclear deal when it threatened to attack Iran knowing how
decisively it will be crushed, thus force the American Congress to howl the
demand that the Administration rush to rescue Israel from annihilation.
Understanding this part of the logic behind the editorial
sheds a great deal of light on what else the editors are trying to communicate.
Look at this passage: “Left out of this new order is Israel ,
whose objections to Iran 's
entrenchment in Syria were
brushed aside by Russia .
While Trump's disavowal of the Iranian nuclear accord pleased Netanyahu, there
is no sign of U.S. intent to
arrest the Iranian threat to Israel
in Syria ”.
That is, when Netanyahu traveled to Russia where he
met Vladimir Putin and tried to blackmail him in that same manner, Putin told
Netanyahu to go suck an egg. Instead of doing just that, Netanyahu decided to
take the American President for sucker, and set out to blackmail him using the
method he told his followers helps Israel pull off these things.
Here is how the famed Netanyahu method was put to work on
this occasion: Netanyahu recruited the editors of the Washington Post and gave
them the task of leading the mob of Jewish pundits into echo repeating Israel 's new
demands … and keep at it till they get results.
So the question is this: Will President Trump fall into the
Netanyahu trap, or will he escape it and save America from adding to its pile of
Jewish fabricated woes?
Netanyahu is positing that if America
does not bomb Iran , Israel 's
strategic interests will be harmed. But Trump knows that if he bombs Iran , America 's strategic interests will
be harmed. It is one or the other.