They never cease to advance Israel's Interests

Everyone has interests, some of which are legitimate; some are not. The fundamental principle upon which the Jewish culture was erected, being to live the parasitic life at the expense of others, Israel's illegitimate interests extend into the territories of its neighbors.

Israel has limited powers to influence what goes on in those countries, and this is why it needs America's power and prestige to move things its way in those places. This has been one of the reasons why the Jewish lobby in America worked hard to make Israel America's number one priority. In fact, the situation is such that American institutions – from the Congress down to the smallest clerk in the nation's tiniest county – were programmed to cost America a mile to give Israel an inch whether or not the inch was vital to Israel.

That philosophy applies locally such as compelling the American population by law to consume products made with forced labor in occupied Palestine. It also applies on the world stage where America repeatedly carries out policies that end up killing any Arab person, destroying any Muslim country, and ruining any Arab or Muslim project when such act promises to serve the interests of Israel.

You can see how this philosophy works when going over the Wall Street Journal editorial that came under the title: “Putin's Syria Play” and the subtitle: “Trump and Tillerson are ceding the advantage to Russia and Iran,” published on November 12, 2017.

The reason why the Jewish editors of the Journal wrote that piece is to denounce their own government––more specifically their President Donald Trump and their Secretary of State Rex Tillerson––for choosing to save the lives of the Syrian people rather than work to secure the illegitimate interests of Israel inside Syria. In fact, the editors say this much in the first paragraph of their editorial. Here is that passage: “The news is Mr. Trump's deal with the Russians for the 'deconfliction' of Syria. This is ceding the regional advantage to Russia and Iran”.

They go on to lament like this: “That's the take-away of the joint statement that builds on months of discussions and diplomacy ... The strategy aims to achieve de-escalation of the civil war and hold U.N.-supervised parliamentary and presidential elections… In July President Trump agreed with the Russians to enforce a deconfliction zone near the Israeli and Jordanian borders. The point was to stop the fighting and address the humanitarian crisis.” Can you imagine how disagreeable this must have been to the Jews?

Well, that was the past, which the editors of the Journal did not like one bit. So they looked to the future and asked: “What comes next?” They answered that they fear more of the same will continue to happen, meaning the cease-fire will solidify the gains made by the Syrian government. In turn, this will free more Russian and Iranian-backed fighters in Western Syria who will be diverted eastward, they went on to explain. In addition, they lamented that the compact between the U.S. and Russia has preserved the movement of Iran and Hezbollah along the Golan Heights.

The editors say they don't like that either, even if the result was that “violence in the area has been significantly reduced, and thousands of Syrian families have returned to their homes.” Another event (or non-event) they complain about is that they don't see evidence Iran and Hezbollah are leaving the area despite the fact that the US, Russia and Jordan signed a Memorandum of Principles to that effect. But the problem is that they don't say how they determined there was no evidence Iran and Hezbollah are leaving. Instead, they want us to simply take their word for it.

And because they don't trust Russia or its President, they don't like the idea that the Trump administration believes Mr. Putin will help broker a UN-supervised peace process. They point out that the result so far has been that Russia convened meetings with Iran and Turkey, which the Trump administration legitimized by sending an official observer to witness the talks, they explained.

What's puzzling about these editors and others like them is that they use a laughable trick to try monopolizing America by isolating it from the rest of the world. The way they do it is warn America it is legitimizing someone by talking to them or by attending their meetings. Who or what do these people think America is? The diplomatic Underwriters Laboratory (UL) of the world? Or is it the ISO?

Having argued that none of what Trump is doing serves the interests of the United States or Israel, the editors concluded that “six years of fighting in Syria have taught that military facts on the ground will determine the parameters of any peace.” This is their way of saying keep your powder dry, America, because you'll be called upon to resume the killing in that part of the world.

But why is that? It is so because there is “zero evidence Mr. Putin shares America's interests. He wants to prop up the Assad regime and threaten NATO and Israel,” they explain. As you can see, there is not a word in that answer about saving Syrian lives.

And of course, they end the editorial not by cheering the Syrian lives that the coalition has saved and continues to save, but by moaning that “Mr. Putin is winning in Syria”.

Can you really bring yourself to calling these creatures human?