Benny Avni just published an article
on a subject about which I harbored ambivalent emotions. The article is forcing
me to tell a part of my story I wanted the world to know about because of what
it reveals. But it is also a story that is so morbid, I was reluctant to take
it public. I hesitated all these years because to have someone hear it, is like
watching a cannibal cut up a live human being and eating him one piece at a
time.
The story has to do with the
Jewish-inspired American use of Human Rights. You'll quickly realize that the
subject is used like a knife to carve out a live human and eating him as would
savage animals in the wild. You'll see how this is done in real life when you
read Avni's column that came under the title: “Washington can't let the Saudis
get away with this,” published on October 8, 2018 in the New York Post.
To get a sense of what's involved, we
need to go back to the beginning. It must be said that each time the Americans
discovered something they didn't know existed, they came under the illusion
that no one else knew about the thing. This prompted them to start a movement
that sent them preaching the thing around the world. To their surprise, they
always discovered that humanity had known about the thing for thousands of
years before America had come into existence. Three such concepts were life,
liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Packaged as Human Rights, these
concepts became the cultural message that benevolent America, winner of the
“Great Wars,” wanted to spread around the world despite the fact that they were
already there. But then came the Jews who introduced a new concept into the
American culture. It was the idea of doing nothing that didn't serve one's own
interests. The lesson they taught was that even when you pretend doing
something for someone, you must think of getting something for number ONE …
which is you. This made it so that in one short instant, the discourse in
America changed from “doing something because it is the right thing to do,” to
the new formulation: “doing something because it is in my interest, or because
it is in the interest of America”.
And this is how the Jews got the Americans
to use Human Rights as a weapon to discredit other nations, thus gain credit
for itself. It was ingenious but only by half because Jewish ingenuity has a
dark side. In fact, getting on the Human Rights bandwagon was important for the
Jews because Israel was becoming a cesspool of everything that defines
violation of Human Rights. And so, to have America criticize others about their
Human Rights and not criticize Israel, was a good way to divert attention from
Israel's beastly record.
And then, something else developed in
America. It was the use of Human Rights as a weapon to serve American interests
at the expense of “friends,” and I was the first to feel this development. I
detected it during the Reagan era when the American President wanted to
pressure the Canadian government to end its persecution of me. He wanted to do
it without breaking the code of silence that existed between the so-called liberal
democracies to the effect that they will never speak ill of each other
publicly.
What Reagan did, was seize on the complaint
that Canada was subsidizing its softwood lumber industry, and slapped high
tariffs on Canadian softwood. He whispered in Canadian ears that the tariffs
will be lifted if and when Canada stops its cowardly treatment of me. But
Reagan knew that Canada will not flinch as long as my case was not publicized
given that I was blacklisted by the Jews for life. The net result was that the
Americans gained billions of dollars at the expense of Canadians.
After that came disputes between the
two countries about the mad cow disease, the beef packaging industry, the dairy
industry, and they were all handled in that same manner under different
American Presidents and different Canadian Prime Ministers … and Canada never
flinched despite the fact that a number of farmers went bankrupt and committed
suicide. The beastly practice ended after four decades only when I started this
blog.
Look now what Benny Avni says America
should do to use Human Rights as a weapon, and gain something by doing to Saudi
Arabia what it did to Canada. Here is a condensed version of Avni's list:
“America must defend human rights, but
we should know an ally from foe. America must rebuke the Saudis. The right kind
of pressure can enhance American interests. Trump wants the Saudis to
contribute more to defense. So he should remind the Saudis they must do so.
Riyadh should also calm energy markets. When trump releases the Palestine peace
plan, the Saudis must support it. Salman should pressure Palestinians to reduce
their demands. He should make his ties with Israel public. If Salman is caught
assassinating a columnist, he'll need to be reminded what it would be like
without a superpower in his corner”.
That story has to do with the
suspicion that a writer was dismembered by the Saudis to silence him. But as
you can see, there was no suggestion that he remained alive while being cut up;
and no suggestion that he was eaten by cannibals one piece at a time.
All I can say is this: How lucky that
man! Imagine if he had to suffer that same pain for forty years without dying,
and seeing his assailants eat him piece by piece. Let me tell you; it felt
horrible.