When something happens, perhaps spontaneously,
that is not of the sort you see every day, and people in the vicinity react
with unwarranted vigor, the expression that is used to describe what happened
goes like this: It was much ado about nothing.
Both the response to the unexpected event, and the
reaction to that response fall in the category of natural human behavior, and
so you figure: This is understandable. If, however, the unexpected event keeps
recurring, and the same people keep reacting with the same unwarranted vigor,
you become suspicious of the occurrence. If after repeated investigations, it
is established that the event does not even recur but that the same people keep
reacting as if it did, you conclude that these people are playing a dirty game.
With this in mind, you recall that the system of
government known as liberal democracy has institutionalized the method of
“checks and balances” to curtail the human tendency to veer toward the excess.
You also establish that the method was practiced by the human species even
before we became fully human. In fact, no one gets away with any kind of
excessive behavior whether it be among apes or among humans. We instinctively
check and balance each other in our daily interactions, especially when we
discover that someone is playing a dirty game by generating uncalled for much
ado about nothing.
That's what is beginning to happen to the Jewish
excessive use of the 'antisemitic' accusation. To check and balance the Jews,
ordinary people began to challenge them for throwing the accusation at anything
and everything that's done in the normal course of everyday living. When you
look at the accusations and realize that the Jews are playing a dirty game, you
investigate them. You study the history of their use of the accusation, and
discover that worse than engage in much ado about nothing, the Jews are
deploying a strategy which harbors more horrific implications than what comes
out Pandora's Box. You discover this is how they managed to take control of the
strategic institutions in America.
You'll sense all this when you study the article
that came under the title: “Anti-Semitism run amok on campus” and the subtitle:
“A University of Michigan student says it's time to say 'enough.'” It was
written (supposedly) by the student, Talia Katz, and published on October 13,
2018 in the New York Daily News. But make no mistake, my friend, these are not
the views of Talia Katz alone; they are those of the Jewish establishment,
owner of the Horror Box that would horrify Pandora herself.
Look how the writer(s) began the article: “I have
had professors reprimand me for my background as the daughter of an Israeli
immigrant.” She (they) did not tell how this happened, leaving it to the
readers to imagine the worst. It is unlikely that those who read the article
will spend time going over the multitude of possibilities before settling on
one. But we must do so because the Box of Horror that has allowed the Jews to
take over a superpower, is stirring again as it prepares to unleash more lurid
horrors on humanity.
If the professor had spoken directly to Talia
Katz, telling her that he discovered she was the daughter of an Israeli
immigrant, and that she should be ashamed of herself, this professor should be
tried to the fullest extent of the law and punished. But you know what? Take it
for granted that no one who is not brainwashed by the Jews is stupid enough to
commit an act as silly as that. The unnamed professor is innocent; you can be
certain of that.
If something along that line did happen, it would
have come about in this fashion: Not knowing who is who among his students, and
during the course of a general discussion about the settlers in the West Bank,
the professor made a few run-of-the-mill sorts of remark. One such remark
pertained to the crimes committed on a daily basis by the settlers who
illegally occupy Palestinian land with the countenance of the Israeli
population and the protection of an American equipped Israeli army.
The professor might have added that the Americans
should be ashamed of themselves for not putting an end to this ongoing crime
... more so than the Israeli population and the settlers themselves. And that's
when Talia Katz pretended to take the reprimand personally; when she felt hurt
and compelled to write about her experience. It is vintage Jewish baloney.
Once you develop the key to the way that these
people operate mentally, you'll find that everything they say and do aim to
spin whatever is in the news at the time, to make them appear like they are in
charge because they deserve to be. In consequence, they want every authority in
the country to recognize this reality and promote their supremacy. Look how the
ghost writers of Katz's article conveyed this notion in the subtler of ways:
“Just because students throw out the claim that
Jews have too much power on this campus does not mean I should be obsequious in
the face of anti-Semitism”.
In the old days, people used to get sued or
blacklisted and have their lives ruined for suggesting that the Jews had too
much power, something they denied vehemently. Now that they feel secure they
irrevocably have that power, they confirm it by not denying it. They go further
and use reverse psychology to tell the readers how to adapt to this reality.
Here is how Katz's ghost writers did that: Despite
the fact there was no suggestion anywhere in the article that someone had asked
the Jews to lick boots, Katz said she will not be obsequious, which means she
will not lick boots. But why would she think licking boots when someone says
she has the power? Actually, it's not that she meant to say she's the one to
lick boots; it's that she meant to suggest that those who discovered Jews have the
power, must do the next logical thing and get ready to lick Jewish boots.