From time to time, politico-cultural
events of consequence flare-up in America, and almost immediately the
all-knowing pundits that keep missing such events, come out their hiding places
and proclaim that these events were totally unexpected. What are they talking
about?
Ever since the American civil war, every
major politico-cultural event that took place in America was connected to a
liberation movement of some kind. The phenomena ranged from the freeing of the
African slaves to the adjudication of the Native land claims to the liberation
of women of all colors. Each time that a movement of this kind began to perk
up, the official denial machine sprang into action and tried to downplay the importance
of what was happening. When the machine could no longer dampen the event, the
truth burst into the open, and the phenomenon garnered a priority position in
the public discourse.
A new event is now perking up, and has
garnered a great deal of attention in the public discourse. And yet, the
official denial machine is nowhere to be seen or heard from. There are two
reasons for this: One is that America's officialdom, which used to be composed
mainly of the White Anglo-Saxon Protestant (WASP) element, has changed. The
other reason is that the phenomenon itself has turned into a new kettle of
fish.
Whereas the previous movements were geared
to win concessions from the WASP establishment, the current reality is that the
establishment itself is rebelling against what it sees as the start of its own
extinction. In fact, while the WASPs no longer fear the takeover of the
Republic by the Africans or the Natives, and while they would gladly hand the
reins of power to the women, they are terrified of their nemeses taking over
the Republic. These would be the Jews who were a tool in the hands of the
establishment, helping it implementing its colonial designs in the Middle East
and elsewhere, but have become the establishment's rivals and mortal enemies.
The Jewish mode of operation most feared
by the WASPs, now calling themselves “Nativists,” can be studied by going over
the Washington Post editorial that came under the title: “Oppression in the
Middle East is worse than ever — and Trump is encouraging more.” It was
published on December 2, 2018. To understand the significance of what's in that
piece of work, it helps to know something about the Irish shepherd and his dog.
The shepherd could be alone and in charge
of hundreds of sheep with no one to help him but his dog. Because a human
cannot run fast enough or long enough to keep the sheep from going astray,
especially when the time comes to herd them into the corral, the shepherd
stands on a hill from where to see the entire landscape, and uses a whistle to
send coded instructions to the dog. The latter gets the message as to where
around the herd it must run and bark so as to guide the sheep into the corral.
Now, my friend, think of the shepherd as
representing the New-York/Tel-Aviv crime syndicate, using the editors of the
Washington Post as the dog that barks at the American Congress of sheep. The
instructions are whistled in Tel Aviv, received at the Post in Washington, and
barked in the form of editorials that guide the Congress into the corral of
America's service to Israel and self-destruction.
The current goal of the Jews is to
establish a working relationship between the Sunni Arabs and America to stand
against Israel's number one enemy: Shia Iran, without the relationship becoming
too chummy lest it rise above Israel's cordial relations with America. For
this to happen, maneuvering the Congress will require
great skills. The Jews proved they are adept at pulling this kind of feats, and
that's what frightens the Nativists. They saw themselves being outmaneuvered by
their nemeses at every turn, and believe they will continue to lose till they
are extinct and replaced by the Jews at the helm of the Republic that was
founded by their forefathers.
But why can't the Nativists put together a
strategy that will stand up to the Jews and beat them at their game? Well, the
thing is that the Jews make progress by slandering those who are not around to
defend themselves. This impresses the Congress of sheep so much, it does what
the Jews tells it to do without question. And so, for the Nativists to counter
this Jewish game, they must forgo defending themselves initially, and engage
instead in the business of defending those whom the Jews attack behind their
backs. This would be the Arabs, such as the Palestinians, for example.