What
do you think would be the most apt and most concise description of primitive
and savage tyrants? Try this for answer: They can hate but not be hated. They
can speak but cannot be spoken to.
Now
think about it. Who “enjoys” such privilege in America today? You got it. They
are the Jews who can hate so much as to have an innocent man in his nineties
deported because it makes them feel better. And while given this gift each time
they ask for it, they cannot be resented, let alone hated, for arguing that
they deserve to be compensated for a Holocaust they never experienced, while at
the same time arguing that African Americans who served as slaves for several
generations, have no right to claim compensation, let alone receive it.
Okay,
got it. But what about the business of speaking or being spoken to? How does
that factor in our query? Well, ever since our species acquired the ability to
speak, the gift of speech was monopolized by the authorities. They used it at
will, or granted it to others upon request. It even happened that for a long
time, the women and the lower caste of both genders could not make a request to
speak in the presence of the authorities. While spoken to, they were not allowed
to signal the wish to address the one that’s governing over them.
After
ten thousand years of experimentation: of trials and errors, successes and
failures, disappointments and triumphs, we, of the human species thought we had
a workable system so close to perfection, it required no more than minor tweaks
to round the corners and render the system absolutely perfect. But we proved
wrong because among us, lived a virulent organism that defines evil incarnate.
These
are the people who convert to what they believe is an ethno-religious
philosophy of life called Judaism. But the reality is that they are embracing
neither an ethnicity nor a religion. They are embracing a criminal way of
living, which they sustain by curtailing or totally obliterating the right of
others to live their lives, secure in the knowledge that they can express
themselves freely without being “watched” and constantly hounded by the evil
incarnates or by their beastly followers. Also … live their lives without being
harassed physically or via other means by the same beasts or by different ones.
What
is hateful, and deservedly so, about these characters, is that they make the
moves by which they pretend to play the game of life according to the rules
prescribed in the social contract. But what they do in reality, is play a dirty
game, always trying to trip or hurt those that play by the rules on the same
playing field. The goal of the evil characters, is to put the other players out
of commission, thus win the game by default.
The
Jews do that, but then pay for it dearly when a society becomes convinced that they
have reached the point of no return. For the first time, the Jews are coming
close to that critical juncture in America, and you'll understand why, when you
read the New York Times editorial that came under the title: “Curbing Speech in
the Name of Helping Israel,” and the subtitle: “A Senate bill aims to punish
those who boycott Israel over its settlement policy. There are better
solutions.” It was published on December 18, 2018 in the New York Times.
Stripped
of the niceties that sanitize the language used to describe the characters from
Hell, you'll see in the paragraph that follows how the editors of the New York
Times describe what those characters are doing at this time, to trigger the
next holocaust:
“An
issue involving Israel is before Congress, testing America's freedom and right
to dissent. It is a proposal that would impose civil and criminal penalties on
American institutions that participate in the right of Americans who oppose
Israel's occupation of Palestine. The proposal's chief sponsors, Senator Ben
Cardin, a Jew of one stripe, and Senator Rob Portman, a Jew of another stripe,
want to attach the proposal to the package of spending bills that Congress
needs to pass before midnight Friday to avoid a shut down of the American
government”.
That
is, the two Jews are using the powers vested in them, not to play the game
according to the rules prescribed in the social contract — thus serve the people that elected them — but play dirty tricks in violation of the code
of conduct that's observed by everyone else, and expected of them as well.
And
so, instead of fulfilling their duty to make life better for the American
people—count them—only two Jews masquerading as American senators, are
holding hostage, the well-being of 320 million Americans. They are doing it by
threatening to shut down the government unless the animal settlers calling
themselves Jews, in far away occupied Palestine, are given the means to
continue ethnic cleansing the land they are occupying in defiance of
international and American laws.