There is a saying that goes like this: You
cannot unscramble an egg. It means you cannot make a whole egg out of a
scrambled egg. But if you're an American politician, the Jew has a way of making
you lay an egg — a whole
egg, in fact. This will happen each time that you try to do America's work.
You'll be paralyzed till you lay the egg, and after that, you'll be free to do
work for Israel and the Jews … and only them.
Clifford D. May has gone out of his way
this time, writing an article that contains many of the tricks used by Jews to
make America's politicians lay eggs. He thus created a valuable case study on
the subject. The article came under the title: “Trump's clear view of the Golan
Heights,” and the subtitle: “International law does not license aggressors to
launch risk-fee wars,” published on April 9, 2019 in The Washington Times.
Each time that a Jew makes a presentation
for an audience of American politicians, he or she would choose one of the
tricks they have in their tool box, and make it the cornerstone around which
they build a case. To create a richer rhythm, they might also use other tricks
as second fiddle to accompany the soloist.
The cornerstone trick chosen by Clifford May
this time, consists of rejecting the idea that the search for truth begins with
observation, replacing it with the idea that the assertion of truth is made
when the Jew impugns bad motives to those who oppose him. Once the Jew lays out
this concept, and the American accepts it, the Jew opens for himself an
infinite world of possibilities. For example, he can say, I robbed that guy
because he is evil, and he intended to rob me. Or, I killed him because he was
evil, and he intended to kill me. Or, I bombed his family because they were
evil, and they intended to bomb my family. You get the idea.
For this to work more convincingly, a
secondary fiddle is often used to accompany the soloist. It works in 2 steps.
First, there is this: The Jews have every right to go back to the homeland they
left 2,000 years ago. Second, there is this: The Palestinians are evil, and
they want to turn the clock back ten or a hundred years. These people live in
the past and don't know how to live in modern times or move into the future.
Using those tricks and a few more,
Clifford May was able to construct a fake narrative that looks like a normal
event at first blush but in reality, contains alarming images as you'll soon
see. Put in condensed form, the Clifford May narrative goes something like
this:
“European Jews established Israel in
Palestine. The local Arabs attempted to stop them. Israelis acquired
territories. They exited most of them. Israel retained two-thirds of the Golan.
Israelis were open to a deal with Syria, but the Arab League said: no peace
with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiation with it. Next was the
1973 war. Eight years later, Israel annexed the Golan. Last month, President
trump recognized the Golan as part of Israel. Claims were made that annexation
of the Golan violates Security Council Resolution 242. This is not a Chapter 7
resolution, simply a statement. It is a fraud to regard it as globalist
legislation. Resolution 242 also emphasizes that every state in the area has
the right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from
threats or acts of force. Tehran is violating that right by establishing bases
in Syria. By recognizing Israeli sovereignty in the Golan, Trump has given a
boost to any future Palestinian-Israeli peace process. So long as Palestinians
believe destroying Israel is a realistic goal, they will not agree to end the
conflict. Only if Palestinians are convinced there is more to lose than gain,
serious negotiations can happen”.
After spinning history in such a way as to
make the armed Jewish invaders look like saints, and make the unarmed
Palestinian victims look like demons, Clifford May pulled his cornerstone trick
— that of impugning bad
motives to the Iranians as well as the Palestinians.
The utility in going after the Iranians,
is that it was meant to justify the Jewish repeated bragging about bombing
Syria hundreds of times. The Jews pulled it off by hiding behind a claim that
went like this: We hit the Iranians in Syria because these people are evil, and
they intended to hit us. As to the Jewish handling of the Palestinian case,
discussing it requires a more elaborate explanation:
The Jews who lived for thousands of years
at the expense of others, have managed to do so by creating new arguments as to
why everyone they encounter should give them something. In modern times, the
two excuses they used to get something for nothing was to argue that getting
something will foster understanding between them and the rest of society, thus
help reduce acts of antisemitism. As well, peace in the world will flourish if
America gave the Jews what belongs to someone else — that which belongs to
the Palestinians, for example.
America fell for this kind of garbage
every time and gave them plenty. But when the Jews tried to pull a similar
trick in the Canadian Province of Quebec, the students responded forcefully. It
is that they would have seen the scholarships allocated to them reduced because
money would have been diverted to the Jewish organizations that claimed they
had a plan to foster understanding between them and the rest of society.
The students demonstrated under the
slogan: We already understand the Jews, and what we know is disgusting us. Get them
off our case, and send them somewhere else.