There is a headline that will make you realize it speaks of an
endemic question requiring a major treatment of the subject. The headline is
this: “Why Ocasio-Cortez's 'concentration camp' comparison still matters,”
written by Kaylee McGhee, and published on July 3, 2019 in the Washington
Examiner.
The headline forces the question: Why do normal people such as
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) see the things that brainwashed fanatics such as
Kaylee McGhee, are incapable of seeing? A quick answer to this question goes
like this: AOC and normal human beings, see and react not simply to the
horrific acts which are committed by someone; they see and react to the
demonstrated potential of that someone to commit even more horrific acts.
This is an abstract concept that begs to be illustrated with an
easy-to-understand mechanical model. So, imagine you have a gun that shoots
ordinary bullets through a sheet of steel that's a quarter of an inch thick. You
now fire a bullet into a piece of wood that is a foot thick, and the bullet
goes through it. Someone hands you a box of newly engineered bullets, claiming
they will go through two-feet of wood –– twice as thick as what your bullets
would go through.
You don't have a piece of wood that's two feet thick to test the
new bullets, but you have a sheet of steel that is twice as thick as the
quarter inch you used previously. You fire the new bullet into it, and the
bullet goes through the sheet of steel. This performance convinces you that
even if you did not fire the new bullet on wood, it has the potential to go
through two feet of wood.
The point of that imagined experiment is to show that the best way
to obtain proof of something, is always to witness the actual event. But if
this cannot be done, you may conduct a similar kind of experiment, and
extrapolate from it what would happen in case the actual event was duplicated.
In fact, because we don't always have the full slate of information that we
need to make the correct decision, ordinary human beings rely on that kind of
thought experiment to navigate through the vicissitudes of the daily life.
It is what Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez did when she saw the condition
in the Texas detention center. She concluded that the people who are
responsible for this situation, had the potential to commit the horrific acts
that were committed in the concentration camps of World War II. It is just that
the Americans were not given the opportunity to go as far.
In fact, the same can be said about the monsters who committed the
“No Gun Ri” massacre in South Korea in 1950, the “My Lay” Massacre in South
Vietnam in 1968, the “Abu Ghraib” atrocities in Iraq and the waterboarding
torture. Because they had it within them to do what they did when given the
opportunity, it must be concluded that these American soldiers and border
guards would have committed the atrocities that the Nazis did, had they been
given the opportunity to unleash their savage instinct on those who cannot defend
themselves. The potential was there –– thankfully, the opportunity was not.
So then, what does that say about the Jews who jump at every
occasion to create an artificial gap between what happened to Jewish adults in
a war situation almost a century ago, and what happens to infants and toddlers
in today's peacetime America? What it says is that the Jews are not reacting to
observed facts or to what can be extrapolated from them; they are reacting to a
deeply ingrained cultural belief that is divorced from reality. And so, here is
another experiment we can conduct to unveil what that belief is made of:
Ask those Jews what they would do to a ninety year old man that
only stood guard at the gate of a concentration camp during World War II, and
they'll say he should be deported so that justice be served decades later, even
if he did not interact with the prisoners or mistreat them. The Jews will
explain that having accepted to stand guard at the gate of a concentration
camp, proves that if the man were given the opportunity to be as bad as those
who committed horrible acts, he would have done the same thing. He had the
potential that just did not come to fruition, they’ll insist. Thus, the Jews
would punish the man, not because of what he did, which was little but for what
they extrapolate was the potential within him to do. In their mind, he stands
at par with the worst of the Nazi monsters.
Does that tell us what belief is deeply ingrained in the Jewish
culture that keeps them divorced from reality? Yes. Simply put, it is the
belief that they are so different and apart from the human race, they ought to
be judged by a different set of rules … or not judged at all. It is why the
Jews will not allow any kind of comparison between the Texas detention centers,
set-up for ordinary mortals, and the concentration camps of an earlier era,
set-up for extraordinary Jews.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who is not handicapped by that sick
fantasy or anything like it, observed a situation the way that normal human
beings do, reacted to it the way that normal human beings do, and spoke out the
way that normal human beings do.
And so, the self-declared abnormal Jews reacted by protesting
being considered normal human beings. They want to remain separate and apart,
especially when it comes to the application of the law.