The saying used to go like this: “America went into Iraq at the
behest of the Jews to kick Arab asses but got its ass kicked instead.” A new
saying is gaining traction, and it goes like this: “America went into the
Middle East at the behest of the Jews to deter the Muslim World but got
deterred instead”.
The effect of a deterred superpower is what you see when you look
at the Jews who used to encourage America to bomb an Arab or a Muslim country
and you discover that they changed their tune. They used to cry out: bomb,
bomb, bomb. Now you hear them and hear their gentile cohorts praise America for
exercising restraint and refrain from bombing.
Did you ever imagine that you will someday read words to this
effect: “Trump will likely conclude to stay calm [and] not play omnipotent
global cop responsible for the safe commerce of those who oppose US withdrawal
from the Iran deal, and to not weaken sanctions”? Now you hear it more
frequently than you can imagine.
In fact, this is what you'll find at the end of a column written
by Victor Davis Hanson. It came under the title: “Iran and the Levers of Global
Power,” and the subtitle: “Vis-a-vis Tehran, Trump has more choices than
previous presidents have had, partly because the US is now the world's largest
producers of oil and gas.” It was published on July 2, 2019 in National Review
Online.
What happened during the past few years was that––for some funky
reason––the Americans came to believe that after centuries of living in misery,
the Jews had learned how to avoid misery. And so, they handed the Jews the
levers of power for their ship of state. It was a mistake. It's because the
next thing the Americans knew, was that the Jews had navigated them into the
sea of misery where they had been mired during the miserable centuries that
they roamed the Earth.
Still, instead of taking command of the helm and steering
themselves out of the morass, the Americans left it up to the Jews to get them
out of there yet again. And once more, the result has been a pitiful sight to
watch. One such example is Victor Hanson's column in which he tried to spin the
facts of the existing situation in such a way as to make them look attractive.
But look at them, and you'll get the sense of seeing a pig that’s wearing a
Victoria Secret lingerie; one whose face was smeared with a jovial cherry-red
lipstick. It may look funny to some people, but it is yucky to most other people.
In fact, nothing is more revolting than to negotiate a deal with a
Jew in which you promise to give up something in return for the Jew promising
to give up something. You deliver on your promise, but the Jew never keeps his
part of the bargain. And when you try to recoup what you delivered; the Jew
threatens you with physical harm. Believe it or not, this is how the Jews have
behaved for half a century with the Palestinians; it is how they forced America
to act regarding the Iran nuclear deal. It is what Victor Hanson and those like
him are praising instead of condemning.
Whereas––during the negotiations that led to the deal––many smart
people were predicting that the choice was between having a deal with Iran or
risking war, the Jews rejected that scenario and accused its authors of trying
to scare the public. Well, that's where we're at now since the Trump
administration pulled America out of the deal. Once again, the choice has come
down to rescuing the deal or having a war.
But instead of encouraging those who wield the power to begin
looking at the situation from the point of view of the Iranians and addressing
their concerns, Victor Hanson has done the equivalent of opening the drawer and
pulling out the old and discarded arguments about how easy it will be for
America to win a confrontation with Iran. In fact, here is how Hanson started
his discussion:
“In the current American-Iran stand-off are a number of global
players. That is hardly new, but what is novel is that for the first time in
decades, there's almost no power that can obstruct or alter US effort to confront
Iranian aggression in America's own time and fashion”.
But why is it that knowing that a war with Iran will severely
damage America and Israel, these people continue to advocate for a behavior
that will lead to war? Well, it does not take a PhD in psychoanalysis to figure
this one out. Anyone that has watched youngsters grow up, will recognize such
behavior as being typical of teenagers who try to act as tough as adults when
in fact, they are only equipped with the wherewithal of a child.
And so, while trying to mimic the grownups they know, the
teenagers display the insecurities of a child. Amazingly, these realities have
also been the most permanent component in the Jewish culture. Unfortunately, it
is what the Jews have transferred to the American culture.