Look at the following two inconsistencies, and you'll know what
this discussion is about:
First, you can deny the existence of God if you want to, but you
cannot deny the Holocaust or question any aspect of the stories about it which
are put out by the self-designated Jewish officialdom.
Second, when mass shooting happens in America, and you mention the
subject of gun control, you get accused of breaching neutrality by taking
advantage of the tragedy to politicize your point of view. But when someone
professes his neutrality concerning the subject of the Holocaust, he gets
clobbered for not being biased in favor of affirming the Holocaust stories put
out by the self-designated Jewish officialdom.
Those situations represent the status quo in America today, and the
people who advocate maintaining it, justify their stance by arguing it is the
way to ascertain that atrocities will never happen again anywhere in the world.
But those who lived during the period of the twentieth century that led up to
the Holocaust, have repeatedly warned that acquiescing to demands that Jews be
treated preferentially, is precisely what causes popular resentment against the
Jews, and the eventual explosion into a pogrom or a holocaust.
So, the question to ask is this: How does a society get to that
point? Well, we have an article that will help us understand how a society can
be made to advance headlong toward such a tragic outcome. It appeared on July
11, 2019 under the title: “That Florida principal and our Holocaust education
imperative,” written by Ira Bedzow and Stay Gallin, and published in the New
York Daily News.
Here’s how the two authors tell the story of the Florida
principal: “After refusing to admit that the Holocaust was a factual,
historical event, William Latson was removed from his position. It's not that
he denied the Holocaust. Rather, in an email, he suggested that as a school
district employee, he was not in a position to say the Holocaust was factual
since not everyone believes the Holocaust happened”.
And here is the explanation of the two writers as to why removing
that man from his position was the right decision to take: “Imagine if a
principal questioned the importance of teaching 'Introduction to Physics,'
because not everyone believes that gravity exists, or banning globes because
there are flat-earthers.” Well, my friend, this is the kind of argument that's
so steeped in absurdity, it blows the mind of the politicians who are too busy
raising money and campaigning to get reelected, thus blindly pass bills written
by Jews. These are laws, whose effect will be the opposite of what they purport
to accomplish.
Let me explain. Nobody has ever wanted to ban the teaching of
physics to everyone, any more than they said ban math or history of geography
or languages or what have you to everyone. But there is always those who
question the wisdom of teaching this subject or that one to students whose
interests are far removed from these subjects. Principal Latson, did not say
ban the teaching of the Holocaust stories to everyone or to anyone for that
matter. All he said was that he wasn't in position to confirm or deny the
Holocaust.
Bedzow and Gallin went on to say: “Having students see all sides
of an issue where values can be prioritized in different ways with varying
implications so that they can arrive at a conclusion based on facts and their
values is one thing. Having students exposed to truth and falsity as two
equally valid options is quite another.” What the two Jewish writers are
saying, is that the Holocaust stories, as put out by the Jewish officialdom,
and tweaked by every Jewish pundit to suit his immediate purpose, must be
accepted as a religious dogma and never subjected to questions that might lead
to a different interpretation of the “facts,” even when the so-called facts
(alternative or not) are self-contradictory on their face as presented.
So then, how do Bedzow and Gallin want America to proceed from
here on? Well, they want to make compulsory the teaching of the Holocaust
stories put out by the self-designated Jewish officialdom to young American
children, thus indoctrinate them at an age when they are the least equipped to
see contradictions or to ask embarrassing questions. Here is what the two writers
have said in that regard:
“Underlying Latson's refusal is a question of the importance of
Holocaust education. It can provide a unique lens to contemporary social,
political and professional issues that challenge us today. It can serve to
foster civics and ethics education. It is an opportunity to give the next
generation the tools they need to learn about moral decision making. How we
teach the memory of the Holocaust is tied to our vision for the future of our
society. Let's remember for the sake of developing our students to become
people who respect each other”.
In other words, these two Jews are saying that socially,
politically and professionally, America is rotten today because its schools
neglect to teach civic and ethics education. Teaching America's children the
Holocaust stories of Jewish officialdom will fix all that because the kids will
be taught to make moral decisions that will equip them to fashion a glorious
vision of the future. Only the teaching of the Holocaust will do that, say
Bedzow and Gallin. Can that be true?
Well, the story of William Latson unfolded in Florida where
compulsory education of the Holocaust already exists. And what happens in
Florida that does not happen in other states are stories like that of the
pedophile and sex trafficker named Jeffrey Epstein who got a sweetheart deal
from the authorities simply because he was a Jew. Can this be the result of
teaching the Holocaust in Florida’s schools?
But who is the authority in Florida that would do this sort of
thing? Well, you might want to check out the story of a sheriff named Scott
Israel who was so incompetent, his detachment allowed the massacre of dozens of
children, and everyone asked for his resignation. But guess what happened. The
“authority” kept him in his position simply because he was a Jew. Can this too
be the result of teaching the Holocaust in Florida’s schools?
This is the kind of moral decision-making that Bedzow and Gallin
wish to cultivate and spread throughout the fifty states of the American
Republic. Well, all that can be said is this: May God help America and save it
from the morality of Jews!