Logic would dictate that when you have on one side,
Kyle Shideler who feels a mysterious connection to Israel, and you have on the
other side, Ilhan Omar who cut ties with her native Somalia, the chances are
that Kyle Shideler will represent a dual loyalty problem for America, whereas
Ilhan Omar will be motivated by a single minded dedication to the American way
of life. She may even prove to be a potential solver of the problem that Shideler
represents.
Logic would go further and dictate that when Kyle
Shideler attacks Ilhan Omar and her likes, he does so to protect Israel. As
well, when Ilhan Omar attacks Israel, she does so to protect America.
Therefore, it stands to reason that from this logical standpoint, Ilhan Omar is
a true friend of America and potentially its savior. At the same time, it
stands to reason that Kyle Shideler and his likes may well be the disguised
lethal enemies of America, characterized as the most destructive Fifth
Columnists ever known to humankind.
You can see how all of that comes into play when you
read the article that came under the title: “How Do You Solve A Problem Like
Ilhan Omar?” written by Kyle Shideler and published on February 27, 2020 in The
Federalist. A blurb that serves as a subtitle comes below the title to explain
that, “Ben Weingarten's new book 'American Ingrate: Ilhan Omar and the
Progressive-Islamist Takeover of The Democratic Party,' makes a compelling
argument that Democrats' sharp leftward turn threatens American ideals and
national security”.
This being what goes on out there, the content of the
article reflects not only the thinking of Kyle Shideler who is a director at
the demonic Middle East Forum––created by the notorious Daniel Pipes––but also
the thinking of the Jewish establishment in America. And so, when reading what
the Shideler article says is contained in the Ben Weingarten article, an
important question poses itself: What could be the preoccupation of the
American Jewish establishment these days?
The answer to that question is clear. With the rise of
a new team of American legislators as courageous as Ilhan Omar, the Jews will
find it increasingly difficult to be loyal to Israel at the expense of America.
And they will find it even more difficult to force everyone to pretend
otherwise by threatening to accuse them of antisemitism if they admit that what
they see the Jews do, amounts to disloyalty to America. This means that sooner
or later, the Jews will have to accept being labeled foreign agents in America,
and operate on that premise or cease all activities meant to promote the
interests of Israel.
But Jews are Jews, and having set in motion the
schemes they are currently executing, they prepared no plan B, no way to alter
the course on which they put themselves or abandon that course altogether.
They'll stay on it come hell or high water till they win the battle, something
they never did before, or fall flat on their faces as they have always done
since the beginning of time.
That leaves us with one final question to ask: How
might it all develop in the future? And we get the answer by studying the
narrative that's given out by Shideler and Weingarten. Here are the revealing
clues:
“Omar's appeal to intersectional identity politics,
including her self-identification as a progressive feminist, won her the
support of the predominantly white, middle-class college students. She suffered
no damage despite statements such as, 'Israel has hypnotized the world, may
Allah awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.' Many
Jewish Democrats may argue that Omar did not have free rein to engage in her
multiple acts of social media antisemitism, but instead faced criticism, and a
demand for an apology from Nancy Pelosi. Weingarten preempted this objection,
handling the battle for influence, but as he documents, this confrontation
ended with a victory for Omar and her friends in the Squad. Omar then
criticized Pelosi for opposing the anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions (BDS) movement. Support for BDS is mainstreamed in the Democratic
Party. The Squad achieved total victory as the Democrats rallied to Omar's
defense and condemned the president of the United States, by name, after he
criticized Progressive Congresswomen”.
It is not too difficult to spot the clues in that
narrative as to what might happen in the future. What we have here is the
pattern of Ilhan Omar and her friends in the Squad, gaining more influence with
the passage of time. This alone would have been an impressive showing. But more
impressive is the fact that people have rallied around Omar when the president
of the United States criticized her unfairly.
What this says is that the current trend is strong and
getting stronger with the passage of time. It consists of boomeranging on
anyone who levels unfair criticism on the good work that Ilhan Omar and her
friends are doing. And this has the effect of giving Omar and her friends even
more influence and more power.