Sunday, February 2, 2020

The chances are, it may be too late for America

It took half a century before the two-by-four hit the mule on the head, and what did the mule do? It brayed like a mule does whether or not it was hit on the head with a two-inch by four-inch piece of lumber.

Do you want to know how a literary mule's braying sounds like? Here is how it sounds like: “Trump's Middle East Plan: Starting Point or Dead End?” It is also the title of the piece that was offered to the world by the editors of the New York Times, who went on to explain in the subtitle that, “A long-awaited 'deal' gives Israel's right wing what it wants.” And they published their piece of work on January 30, 2020.

How is it that despite more than half a century of warnings from people like yours truly and others, the editors of the New York Times and many like them, failed to see it coming? Well, the truth is, there are many reasons why this happened, all of them having to do with gaps in the logic system of the so-called American democracy. It proved to be vulnerable to the Jewish tricks, which they developed over the centuries for exploiting such gaps, and make them work to their advantage.

Two tricks from among the many that the Jews have used to mesmerize and hypnotize the Americans into believing they were transported to the heavenly gusher of Jewish moral clarity –– follow.

First trick. The Jews convinced the Americans that the world hates the Jews, which is why Americans must love the Jews. They also convinced the Americans that the world seems to love the Palestinians, if not all the Arabs, which is why the Americans must pretend to hate the Palestinians if not all the Arabs.

This being the case, the Americans must not accept anything that's said to them by the Arabs. They must instead support the Jews 100 percent and oppose the Arabs 100 percent. Hearing this, the Americans were blown away by the clarity of Jewish logic, and they called the Jews, gods worthy of worship.

Second trick. The Jews convinced the Americans of two contradictory discourses, each coming out one side of the mouth. One discourse informed the Americans that the early Jewish invaders of Palestine were so weak and helpless, the Palestinian farmers––though unarmed––crushed the Jews and slaughtered them like chicken. Hearing this, the Americans were blown away by the clarity of Jewish logic, and they called the Jews, gods worthy of worship.

As to the other discourse, it meant to inform the Americans that the Jewish invaders were so powerful, they beat three fully-equipped Arab armies. No … make that five Arab armies. Heck, why not? Make it seven fully-equipped Arab armies. Hearing this, the Americans were blown away by the clarity of Jewish logic, and they called the Jews, gods worthy of worship.

But who are those duped Americans, and how do they get blinded to the truth of what they are doing? They are every American that does not contribute to the production of the national wealth, yet swim in the wealth that's produced by others like fish swim in the deep ocean of plenty. While those who earn between 20,000 dollars to 100,000 dollars a year, produce the national wealth by farming the land, making products in factories, constructing monuments and rendering real service to the population, those who are blinded to the truth, earn millions of dollars a year for telling those who produce the wealth, they get paid too much.

The blind characters are the ones close to the central bank which prints the money and hands it to the financial houses whose operators––carrying oodles of money––circulate inside the media and political circles of the nation where such characters as the Weinsteins and the Epsteins ply their trade.

Also among these people are the dumbbells who run the New York Times, and have just realized the reality of the following: “From all appearances, the deal seemed nothing more than a cynical attempt at a diversion by two politicians in trouble, a sop to their right-wing bases as each leader vies for re-election.” Do you realize what is carried by this sentence, my friend? It is the following:

Nothing is more closely associated with democracy than the election of those who put their hands on the helm of the ship of state. And so, when they mess with the election, they mess with democracy itself. Thus, when the editors of the New York Times discovered that the Trump-Netanyahu deal was a cynical attempt by politicians in trouble and vying for re-election –– they admitted that democracy has failed. Whereas the claim has always been that democracy was synonymous with peaceful coexistence, it now leads to the hawkish kind of populism that demands a sea of blood from those who get elected. And the latter better deliver blood on a regular basis or they get tossed out of office at election time.

Blood by popular demand is the substance with which the Jewish Old Testament is written. And hawkish blood by popular demand is what America's democracy has become under the supervision of the Jews who took control of the financial institutions, the media outlets, the political apparatus and such editors as the ones running the New York Times.

After all, these are the editors who wrote a 1,400-word piece to conclude––get this now––that Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu are abusing their powers. You wouldn't know!

What does that say about the America of the New York Times and those like it? If anything, it says that America sits inside American hands that have become uncertain, being crushed by the satanic grip of Jewish hands. And there is no realistic way in sight that can be used to rescue America.