To be sure, Benjamin in the context of this article refers to the hundred-dollar banknote in American currency, adorned by the portrait of the multi-talented Benjamin Franklin. There was a time when a hundred dollars represented a purchasing power high enough to get the attention of a politician running for office. And so, the Benjamin as it was nicknamed, came to associate political campaigning with political donations.
For several decades, people
spoke about that phenomenon in the American culture as readily as they spoke
about aspiring politicians attending BBQ parties to meet their donors and
prospective voters. But then one day, a polemical explosion was set off in
America when the House Representative Ilhan Omar suggested that politicians are
influenced by the Benjamins of the Jews.
Before you know it, big and
small Jewish organizations reached out and commissioned their favorite pundits,
and paid them (presumably enough Benjamins) to flood the public square with
articles condemning Ilhan Omar for being so antisemitic as to suggest that
politicians are influenced by Benjamins donated by Jews instead of saying that
politicians vote in favor of Israel and the Jews because morality motivates
them to empower the two who are solely talented to make the world a better
place.
This left the public at large
with the impression that when it comes to moral issues, money does not cause
those who rely on donations to act according to the wishes of the donors. In
other words, where the conscience plays a role, the Benjamin is stopped at the
door of high ethics. But then, guess what happened my friend. Mitchell Bard who
writes opinion pieces for the Jewish publication Algemeiner, wrote an article
under the title: “Harvard Reaches a New Low,” and had it published on September
10, 2020.
Mitchell Bard began with a
preamble that accuses academia of, “widespread abuses that include the
substitution of propaganda for scholarship, the misuse of the classroom to
promote personal agendas, and the normalization of antisemitism on campus.” In
other words, Bard started damning both the institutions of higher learning and
the individuals who run them before saying why he is doing it.
Now that he got this much
vitriol off his chest, he decided to tell the readers what it is that's bugging
him about academia. Are you ready for his revelation as to why he is steamed?
Here it is: “Some people may believe universities are interested in education,
but they are even more interested in money”.
Wow, did you get that? You
must be baffled because you know what money means. It means the Benjamins, of
course. So, there goes the notion that, where the conscience plays a role, the
Benjamins are stopped at the door of high ethics. But what happened to those
Jews? Are they pulling the old trick of running two contradictory discourses at
the same time: One that applies to thee and one that applies to me? Maybe.
But what exactly did Harvard
University do to merit being characterized as having reached a new low? Here is
what the university did according to Mitchell Bard: “The sellout of academic
values is exemplified by Harvard's acceptance of $1.6 million from the State of
Palestine. Could it be a coincidence that, in a case study of the university's
decline in standards, it hired Saeb Erekat, the Palestinians' chief
negotiator?”
Do you know what the Harvard
endowment is worth, my friend? It is worth $40 billion (that's a B.) And when
you do the math, the result says this value is 25,000 times as large as the
paltry $1.6 million donated by the State of Palestine. It is like having
$25,000 in your pocket, and an income stream that keeps it replenished, and you
sell your soul for one measly dollar? Yes, just one dollar. Would you do that?
Can you imagine the honorable Harvard University doing something like that?
Moreover, given that nowadays,
you can easily get 5 percent in dividend on your investment, do you know what
40 billion dollars would earn you? It would earn you $2 billion a year. Do you
know what that says? It says that aside from the income stream Harvard gets
from regular sources, it receives at least $1.6 million from its investments ––
get this now –– every 7 hours throughout the day and the night, 365 days a year.
Unable to comprehend the
enormity of the error he just committed; Mitchell Bard went on to blather the
usual cowardly slander the Jews are known for. He attacked both Saeb Erekat and
Nicholas Burns, the man that hired him. After spewing hate of the kind and
volume that only a Jew would spew, Bard went on to suggest the following:
“Perhaps Erekat can give a lecture on how to promote terror, which students can
apply on the streets of the United States”.
Well, well, well. Given that
terror is already on the streets of the United States without Saeb Erekat being
there to promote it, a string of thoughts comes to mind. It goes like this: To
maintain a firm grip on their colonies, the colonial masters of old used the
“divide and rule” adage effectively. They pitted faction against faction by
inciting and enabling each side to go after the other. This kept both sides in
a weakened state and incapable of going after the colonial masters.
Considering that the Jews have
done something similar in the political arena of America, pitting the two
political parties against each other and becoming masters of the American ship
of state, there is Mitchell Bard who now dreams of doing it on the streets of
the nation. Given that there is already a police force; one that’s trained in
Israel to kill American citizens by the “knee on the neck” method, all that's
needed now, according to Bard, is to show the street gangs how to riot more
destructively and kill members of that same police force.
But how to do that? Well, there
is the Jewish method by which to pull off this kind of trick. It goes like
this: You accuse someone of what you wish to accomplish. When everyone looks in
that direction, you do what magicians do, and that is to play the sleight of
hand when no one is looking at your hand. Bard got everyone looking at Saeb
Erekat and Nicholas Burns, we should now expect that AIPAC will play the
sleight of hand that will get blood running in the streets of America.
With this in mind, we should look out for the formation of Jewish groups who will pretend to help the street gangs leave the life of crime behind them, but in fact, incite and train them to do more serious crimes. And no one will be surprised to know that Mitchell Bard is directing this bloody operation. He just proved he has the talent for it.