Do you remember a man named
Mohamed ElBaradei? He is a lawyer who directed the IAEA at a time when it was
investigating Iran's nuclear activities as mandated by the UN's Security
Council.
The Jews had two problems with
this man. He was Egyptian, and he was telling the truth about Iran having no
nuclear weapons. And so, the Jews recruited Uncle Sam, the biggest bimbo in the
history of the planet, and told him to scuttle the work of ElBaradei, or have
the man fired from his job. The bimbo tried to do just that but failed because
the UN protected their man; an act that was followed by the Nobel Committee
awarding ElBaradei the Peace Prize. That's how America got two middle fingers
at the same time.
Mohamed ElBaradei is retired
now, but the Jews are still unhappy with the UN. Their problem is that thanks
to ElBaradei’s work, six major nations, including the United States under a
sane administration, negotiated a nuclear deal with Iran on behalf of all
humanity. Things went smoothly for a few months until a new administration was
elected in America, and things began to turn sour.
As it turned out, the new
administration had a highly developed bimbo-like tendency mixed with a morbid
religious affinity for the Jews. And so, it did not take long for America, and
for the Jews who reside both in America and Israel, to put their pea-brains to
work and hammer out a demonic little scheme.
It was a plan for America to
pull out of the nuclear deal, thus free it of its obligations, but claim at the
same time that because America was once in the deal, it can still make demands
as if it were a member in good standing. This meant that America could
“legally” enforce the provisions of the deal it wanted to impose on Iran. Well,
America tried to do just that, but to its credit, the UN gave America yet
another middle finger. This stood as one of the UN's most glorious moments,
that which to his discredit, Fred Fleitz calls uselessness
This is what the Fred Fleitz article
is about. It is a complaint that the UN did not see the wisdom in the
nonsensical demonic scheme that America concocted with the Jews to turn the
method of adjudicating legal cases upside down. He wrote the article to explain
why America and the Jews were correct, and why the world, represented by the
UN, was incorrect. Here is what Fleitz said in that regard:
“Trump wants to reimpose UN
sanctions on Iran. To do this, he wants to trigger a snap-back provision in the
Security Council resolution. Council members are blocking this effort. The
growing list of Iran's cheating on the nuclear deal more than justify Trump's
decision to withdraw from the deal and implement his maximum pressure strategy.
The UN Security Council's rejection of US demands, vindicates Trump's judgment
that America needed to act alone. For example, the Council overwhelmingly
rejected a US resolution to indefinitely extend the arms embargo on Iran that
is scheduled to be lifted in October. The refusal of Security Council members to
agree to increase the pressure on Iran further shreds the UN's already tattered
moral authority. But it also shows the urgent need for decisive US global
leadership. Trump has provided this leadership. These gains will vanish if Joe
Biden wins the 2020 presidential election: He has promised to rejoin the
nuclear deal and work through the UN to resolve issues over Iran's nuclear
program”.
Using the Judeo-screwy logic
of reversing the order in the “cause and effect” inviolable sequence, Fleitz
says this: “Iran cheating on the deal justifies Trump withdrawing from the deal
and implementing pressure.” But the reality is that it was Trump who first
withdrew from the deal and applied pressure. Only then did Iran declare that in
response to the pressure, which the other signatories promised to counter with
acts of relief but have yet to fulfill, it was going to increase ever so
slightly its production of uranium, and maintain that stance till the
signatories fulfill their promise.
As if that was not enough,
Fred Fleitz went on to make the point that, “The refusal of the Council to
increase the pressure on Iran, shreds the UN's moral authority and shows the
need for decisive US global leadership.” That is, when America reneged on the
Iran nuclear deal, and created a dangerous situation, the Council should not
have rebuffed America the perpetrator, as it did, said Fleitz. Instead it
should have beaten up on Iran the victim, as the Jews and warmongers of America
were counseling, he went on to say.
Moreover, Fred Fleitz
suggested that because the UN has failed to fulfill its duty, Donald Trump must
now assume the leadership of the world, and run the Planet as if the Jews of
America and Israel owned the joint.