Clifford May says that the UN General Assembly needs to be reformed. It does not take him long before he goes on to complain that, “The big tent of the UN has 193 members. Each –– big or small, rich or poor, free or unfree –– gets one vote.” And this tells you that he wants to go back to the days when some people were considered equal to 3/5 human or some such fraction.
You can see how that mentality
works, and what else it is capable of devising, in the article that Clifford
May wrote under the title: “At 75 the U.N. General Assembly in need of reform,”
and the subtitle: “It's not the organization it used to be and never was,”
published on September 15, 2020 in The Washington Times.
In fact, to show how confused
that mentality is, the writer admits that there exists a 1955 agreement which
guarantees universal membership at the UN. And so, while you'd think that this
settles the issue, Clifford May complains that Taiwan has been denied membership.
So, you ask: What's wrong with that? Well, the reality is that you have one
country that's called China, and two governments that claim to represent both
parts. The important thing is that neither government has declared independence
of the other, which means that both agree there is only one China.
Given that the government in
Taiwan rules over 24 million people, and the one in Beijing rules over 1.4
billion people –– which is about 58 times the population of Taiwan –– and given
that you cannot have two representatives speaking for one government and one
people, the UN chose to recognize the one that rules over the larger
population, as did the rest of the world. What's there to complain about?
Well, you'll understand what
the complaint is about when you make the effort to understand why, in the view
of Clifford May and those like him, it is bad to apply the one-nation, one-vote
principle at the UN General Assembly. And the best way to understand this
riddle, is to study what Jews like Clifford May did to the one-man, one-vote
principle in America.
What they did is kill the idea
of open debate when issues pertaining to Jews or Israel come up for discussion
and evaluation in America. Instead of letting the people participate in the
debates at the kitchen tables and the water coolers of the nation, and let them
decide what's good for the country and what's not, the Jews killed the idea of
holding public debates on Jewish or Israeli issues.
What this has done to the
American democracy is that instead of the people having the right to guide
their representatives as to which way they should vote on the issues, the
Jewish leaders have replaced the voice of the people, and given themselves the
right to whisper in the ears of the representatives behind closed doors how
they will be rewarded or punished depending on how they vote.
And this is the system that
Clifford May wants to see transferred from America to the UN General Assembly.
When you study carefully how it might work, you'll find that it resembles to
some degree the one that existed at the time of the League of Nations a century
ago. This was a time when groups of nations had preference for some and dislike
for others. They all schemed to bring their friends into the league, and keep
the others out. The net result has been the creation of a system that was so
fragile, it could not maintain the peace for more than two decades, after which
the world exploded into World War Two.
This is why –– desirous to
establish a robust system –– the United Nations made its membership universal
in the year 1955. It is why peace has lasted 75 years, with indications that it
will last as long as the Jews are kept from destroying it. But this is
precisely why people like Clifford May want to see the UN crushed under the
guise of reforming it. What these people want is a UN that resembles the
American political scene of the bipartisan evildoers who would give the Jew
what belongs to others for a promise that the Jew will keep his mouth shut concerning
the skeletons he knows are in the closet of the evildoers.
This is why we must all keep
in mind that the day the Jews will make the United Nations look and function
like the American political system, is the day that the United Nations will
start to look and behave like the old League of Nations.
And that will be the day when
we'll have to start worrying that the next world war may not be more than 20
years away. It is how a century ago, the League of Nations found itself
helpless at doing anything to stop the world from sliding onto the path of
World War Two, and the Jews are now working to make it happen again.
What people like Clifford May are working on, has the potential to lead the world into the endless war that the neocons have been dreaming about. They are pushing America to spark it, not knowing what the end result will be except that a prophecy will be fulfilled and they would have played a part realizing it.