Do you remember the old saying about the blind leading the blind? Well, for the purpose of this discussion, try not to think of it as one blind leading the other to the ditch or the swamp or whatever. Think of it instead as the two blinds being led into an arena, each given a sword and told to go after the other. You can imagine that the scene would be comical if it were not so pathetic.
But you know what, my friend?
This is how the scene looked at the time that the Jewish mutilators of history
split into two camps. There was one camp that advocated the continued
occupation of Palestine, and one that stood against it. Actually, the two camps
coming into existence was not as simple as it may sound. What happened was that
originally, the Jews were occupying the space that extended from the leftist
liberal side of the political spectrum to the extreme form of communism.
This happened because Jews had
come to America from Europe where the right-wing movements of the Fascists and
the Nazis were gassing and incinerating the Jews anywhere they could find them
on the Continent. At the same time, however, the left-wing Communists, who were
well established in the Soviet Union by then, were more tolerant of the Jews;
even allied with them in some cases.
And then it happened that a
series of complex and intertwined events in the Soviet Union, the Middle East
and America, inspired a group of liberal Jews to think more tolerantly of
conservatism in America despite the fact that it was associated with the right,
which they used to fear and detest but no more. The group surmised that it
would be more advantageous for the Zionist movement if they thought of
conservatism in America as being nowhere close in ideology to the Fascists or
the Nazis of Europe.
And so, the group converted
from liberal to conservative, thus launched what came to be known as the Neocon
movement. The members vehemently attacked their former soul-mates who
reciprocated by fighting back just as hard. And the two camps have been at each
other's throat ever since, neither of which having any idea what they are
talking about when it comes to the affairs of the Middle East. But they are
throwing blows at each other like blind individuals equipped with swords and
brainwashed to believe that they fight for the survival of their clan.
One soul that converted from
near Communism to Neocon was Clifford D. May whose embrace of the Zionist
movement and whose blind opposition to the Palestinians’ desire to go home from
where they were pushed, made of him an icon of the turncoats. He is so blind to
his destructive fanaticism, if a Conservative were to tattoo a Swastika on the
back of his hand, he would see it as the Star of David and worship it. He wrote
many articles that give him away, some of which were reviewed in this blog.
His latest foray in that realm
is an article he wrote under the title: “After Abraham Accords, time to look at
Palestinian-Israeli conflict with fresh eyes,” and the subtitle: “How peace was
achieved and what the 'Palestinian cause' now requires.” It was published on
September 22, 2020 in The Washington Times.
When reading the following
passage from his article, recall that Clifford May was trained as a lawyer.
Also note that when a prosecutor does not have a “slam dunk” case, he
insinuates the guilt of the defendant without coming right out and accusing
him. Lawyers are taught techniques to do just that when addressing the judge or
the jury, and Clifford May is applying what he learned on his readers. Here is
that passage:
“For decades, a herd of
experts, diplomats, academics, journalists, politicians insisted that a deal
such as President Trump facilitated was out of the question. Why couldn't the
UAE and Bahrain have just continued to develop relations with Israel
discreetly? Why go public now? Because the Israelis were planning, with the
Trump administration's blessing, to extend sovereignty, call it annexation if
you like, over a large swath of the West Bank. The Israelis had a chance to
change facts on the ground”.
As can be seen, in order to go
after the liberal Jews, Clifford May the Neocon, is mutilating history to
insinuate a falsehood that portrays the President of the United States, Donald
Trump, as being a rapist of children. What Clifford May is saying in effect, is
that Donald Trump has conspired with Benjamin Netanyahu to bluff the leaders of
the United Arab Emirates into believing they will rape the children of
Palestine unless the Arab leaders publicly acknowledge they are having a
clandestine affair with the Jewish leaders. And voila, the miracle happened,
they have all been outed, they can now fornicate all they want in the open, but
they will leave the children of Palestine unmolested, at least for now.
I say, “at least for now”
because, being the Jew that he is, Netanyahu thought of making of the bluff a
double play. Now that he ate the cake when the true story was outed, he
believes he can still have the cake by promising his fanatic followers that all
remains as it was because annexation is still on the table, and will happen
sooner or later.
Poor Netanyahu. He does not realize that to have his cake and eat it too, he must first eat it, and then let his digestive system turn it into fertilizer.