Here
is an animal story that can serve as metaphor representing the way that human
beings conduct themselves at times.
A
coyote catches a deer by surprise and bites it in an attempt to disable it. Though
wounded, the deer kicks the coyote in the nose and runs away. The coyote goes
to the council in charge of enforcing the Animal Code of Conduct, and puts in a
complaint which says in essence that you can’t equate the legitimate bite of
the coyote with the illegitimate kick of the deer.
The
Council looks into the coyote’s contention. Its members debate it thoroughly
and finally decide that yes, there is no equivalence between the coyote’s bite
and the deer’s kick. However, the coyote has it the other way around. What is
illegitimate is the coyote’s bite. What is legitimate is the deer’s kick.
Consider
this a response to the article that came under the title: “There Is No
Equivalence in How Hamas and Israel Wage War,” and the abbreviated subtitle:
“At a time when the public square is being polluted with lies, this moment
calls for moral clarity.” It was written by Zach Schapira, and published on May
21, 2021 in the National Interest.
How
do you rate an article like that? Well, under normal circumstances, you comb
the article and set aside every praise the writer attributes to the side he is
promoting. This would be the Judeo-Israeli side. You also reject every insult
he throws at the opposite side. This would be the Palestinian-Hamas side. That
leaves you with what Schapira says are facts, which you’ll compare with what
you know are the facts. You’ll then determine the level of disgrace that’s
yielded by the degree of deviation you detect between the two sets of facts.
But
when you discover that these are not normal circumstances given that the writer
is anything but normal, you multiply by ten the level of disgrace you measured,
to account for the abnormal circumstances. Here is the story that renders this
whole thing so abnormal:
Zach
Schapira says he is an American that did not volunteer to serve in the military
at a time when the military was experiencing a shortage of recruits. This is
bad but to be fair to the man, you note that he is not the only real or fake
American that did this. You can even go further, be generous and forgive him
for being a modern-day draft dodger. But your forgiveness quickly turns into
disgust the moment that you learn he chose to serve in the Israeli army instead
of the American army. This is when the image you have of Schapira turns from
that of a saint to that of the devil. And you determine that every indiscretion
he committed is ten times worse than it appears.
So
now, we comb the Schapira article looking for what he says are facts, and we assess
their veracity. We discover that the article is so packed with lies, analyzing
the first paragraph alone takes up the space allotted for today’s discussion.
And so, I’ll discuss that paragraph, and urge the readers to analyze the rest
of the article themselves. Here is what comes in the first paragraph:
“Israel
is a beacon for democracy. Hamas is a thuggish kleptocracy whose only language
is violence”.
Given
that the word beacon conjures up the idea of being a model for others to
emulate, we look into the forums of the world where large numbers of people are
represented, to see where Israel stands. We find that Israel is considered a
model of darkness, not a beacon to be emulated. The most important of the forums
being the United Nations, Israel’s antagonism towards that international body says
it will be a long time before Israel comes out of the dark and into the light,
let alone shine to be noticed by others.
As
to Israel being a democracy, moral clarity demands that we understand what’s at
stake here. At one end of the spectrum, we have a Palestinian people thirsting to
be free, and coming together to form a perfect union on a land where they lived
since the beginning of time. At the other end of the spectrum, we have a
hodgepodge people that continue to be bribed and summoned from around the world
to come and form a crime syndicate. They call themselves Jews and pretend to be
the descendants of a nomadic tribe that once lived in Palestine — which is non
sequitur whether it is true or false.
The
syndicate’s first and continued order of business being the long-held dream of stealing
Palestine, humanity has come to see the Jews as representing an extreme form of
criminality. Such view has been the case throughout space and time, which makes
it so that no matter how you slice it, there is no way you can elevate the Jews
to the level of the Palestinians and consider them equal.
Moreover,
by calling their behavior an American sort of democracy, the Jews are debasing
this form of governance. It is what’s eroding America’s standing in the world,
and what’s turning the people of America against the politicians who refuse to
come out from under the hypnotic spell of the Jews and their corrupting
Benjamins.
As
to Hamas being a kleptocracy, this is the kind of false accusation the Jews
throw at someone to confuse the audience and hope to reverse the reality that
they are what they accuse others of being. The truth is that most presidents
and prime ministers of Israel were caught red handed stealing from every pocket,
including aid money sent by foreign governments to Holocaust survivors living
in Israel. Kleptocracy is the closest synonym you can ever think of to the word
Judaism.
When
it comes to the language of violence, it is absolutely foolish for Zach
Schapira to accuse Hamas of adopting this language when no one hears from Hamas.
By contrast, we see that thousands of Jewish owned and Jewish influenced
publications throughout the “Western World,” do nothing but urge America to
have all options on the table, and exercise them the way that Israel is doing in
Syria, Gaza and Lebanon. Violence is the closest synonym you can ever think of
to the word Jewish.
Recalling
that it was Israel which created Hamas, trained its members, armed them and
paid them to destroy the Fatah movement, but was surprised to see Hamas turn
against it instead of going after Fatah (now the Palestinian Authority,) it is
reasonable to expect that Israel will commit more errors handling its
relationship with Hamas and others.
Those
of the Syndicate have doomed themselves for an eternity, and there is no one
around that can save them.